[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail not using port 465 for smtp although it is specified in config.php

2021-01-11 Thread David Carvalho
can I set it to use 465 so that users can authenticate to send e-mails and I can get rid of the RELAY rule on the smtp server ? Thanks and regards. Os melhores cumprimentos David Alexandre M. de Carvalho ═══ Especialista de Informática Departamento de Informática Universidade da

Re: [SM-USERS] RELAY needed in Sendmail for squirrelmail to be ableto send?

2021-01-07 Thread David Carvalho
= ''; $smtp_sitewide_pass = ''; are null, the system should try to use the same user/pass used in imap settings to be able to send. If entering an existing valid user and password in those fields, shouldn’t squirrelmail use them to authenticate? Thanks and best regards. David

[SM-USERS] RELAY needed in Sendmail for squirrelmail to be able to send?

2021-01-06 Thread David Carvalho
user = ''; $smtp_sitewide_pass = ''; But the error is the same. Any ideas please? Os melhores cumprimentos David Alexandre M. de Carvalho ═══ Especialista de Informática Departamento de Informática Universidade da Beira Interior - squirrelmail-us

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail & PHP 7 (Ubuntu 16.04)

2016-09-17 Thread David C. Rankin
so for all webapps to transition to php7 the changes are fairly substantial. I don't know what the schedule is for squirrelmail or how far along it is, others will have to chime in. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- -

[SM-USERS] What is needed to make sure the squirrel is ready for PHP 7?

2016-03-23 Thread David C. Rankin
ring complaints about an encoding not being set. Do I need to set encoding to UTF-8 or set something to make mbstring happy? The only mbstring setting I have in php.ini is: mbstring.func_overload = 7 (which is a groupware requirement) Is there something I should try to resolve these messages on m

Re: [SM-USERS] different version of squirrelmail - different behavior when log-in with wrong username/password

2015-09-09 Thread David C. Rankin
e. fail2ban itself should be capable of working with either -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tool

Re: [SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS

2015-06-27 Thread David Highley
ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Errors-To: squirrelmail-users-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net > X-UID: 13513 > Content-Length: 7147 > > On 6/16/15, David Highley wrote: > > Forwarded message: > >>

Re: [SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS

2015-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/16/2015 09:44 PM, David Highley wrote: > Another missed concept is the practice of using DNS CNAME aliases for a > host, like mail.domain.com, so that things are not hardcoded all over > the place and you can move functionality around without going to n > places to change hardcod

Re: [SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS

2015-06-16 Thread David Highley
gt; > List-Help: > <mailto:squirrelmail-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> > List-Subscribe: > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users>, > > <mailto:squirrelmail-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe&

Re: [SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
tes of refreshing required to get on top of the issue again. I can report that after stumbling though the exercise, squirrelmail is happily gathering nuts again. Great package. Keep up the great work! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Re: [SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS

2015-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/15/2015 08:59 PM, David Highley wrote: > /usr/share/squirrelmail/src/configtest.php on line 80 > PHP Warning: fsockopen(): SSL operation failed with code 1. OpenSSL > Error messages: > error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate > verify faile

Re: [SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS

2015-06-15 Thread David Highley
"David C. Rankin wrote:" > > On 06/14/2015 11:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > > Paul, after you look into this, if this was the sole cause, you may > > want to > > drop a Install/Upgrade note regarding php 5.6 and the change required in > > server &g

Re: [SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-15 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/14/2015 11:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, after you look into this, if this was the sole cause, you may want > to > drop a Install/Upgrade note regarding php 5.6 and the change required in > server > settings. > > (even better, it may be worth adding a chec

[SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-14 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/14/2015 08:00 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 06/14/2015 07:05 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >> Checking outgoing mail service >>SMTP server OK (220 phoinix.rlfpllc.com ESMTP Postfix) >> >> I think you have nailed the issue as a 'ca' prob

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-14 Thread David C. Rankin
managing great software. If that means it can only happen every 48 hours or so, then that's just they way it works. (see my next post) -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- - squirrelmail-users mailing list Posti

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-14 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/14/2015 07:05 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Checking outgoing mail service > SMTP server OK (220 phoinix.rlfpllc.com ESMTP Postfix) > > I think you have nailed the issue as a 'ca' problem which makes sense with > the error: 'tlsv1 alert unknown ca

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-14 Thread David C. Rankin
hink you have nailed the issue as a 'ca' problem which makes sense with the error: 'tlsv1 alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48'. Let me know when you have a chance to look into this. I'm happy to do the digging. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. ---

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-13 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/13/2015 12:11 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 06/12/2015 07:02 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >> Paul, >> >> After 1.5.2 update to svn 14501, I can no longer log in to >> squirrelmail. I >> have used the same squirrelmail setup for at least the last

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-12 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/12/2015 07:02 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > After 1.5.2 update to svn 14501, I can no longer log in to squirrelmail. I > have used the same squirrelmail setup for at least the last 6-8 years. The > All operation through Thunderbird (sending/receiving) work

Re: [SM-USERS] What's wrong in Squirrelmail OpenSuse 13.2?

2015-06-12 Thread David C. Rankin
il.org install and it is response to your request here. We'll work it under the other thread. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- - squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/po

[SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-12 Thread David C. Rankin
48 So something in squirrelmail isn't handling the TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() quite like it used to. Let me know what else I can do or test to help isolate the problem. I'd like to get me squirrelmail install back up and running or I will have a lot of upset users in the mor

Re: [SM-USERS] Roaming email broke with update to fedora 21

2015-02-25 Thread David Highley
t = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2:!EXP:!aNULL Looks like SSLv2 is disabled. What does squirrelmail need? > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SSL/DovecotConfiguration > -- > dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 > Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 > > 2015.Február 24.(K) 05:59 időp

Re: [SM-USERS] Roaming email broke with update to fedora 21

2015-02-25 Thread David Highley
"David Highley wrote:" > > "Paul Lesniewski wrote:" > > > > On Sunday, February 22, 2015, David Highley < > > dhigh...@highley-recommended.com> wrote: > > > > > Description of the setup; remote access for email via web server wit

Re: [SM-USERS] Roaming email broke with update to fedora 21

2015-02-22 Thread David Highley
"Paul Lesniewski wrote:" > > On Sunday, February 22, 2015, David Highley < > dhigh...@highley-recommended.com> wrote: > > > Description of the setup; remote access for email via web server with > > squirrelmail and dovecot. Configured to use imap por

[SM-USERS] Roaming email broke with update to fedora 21

2015-02-22 Thread David Highley
Description of the setup; remote access for email via web server with squirrelmail and dovecot. Configured to use imap port 993 and smtp tls. Email resides on another internal email server. This has been working for many years and was working on fedora 20. After new install of web server to fedora

[SM-USERS] variable sent folder not showing up

2014-02-27 Thread David Kramer
Hi. I'm using squirrelmail 2:1.4.22-1|| under Ubuntu 12.04, which seems to be working fine. As far as I can tell, that's the latest stable release, though I see lots of references to later releases. I installed several plugins that seem to be working fine, but one that is very important to me is

Re: [SM-USERS] Adding RTL-LTR buttons to HTML Editor

2013-10-22 Thread David
; They won't add a button for ltr to rtl functionality but you can change the default direction and the default language. Ted Hatfield On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, David wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to be able to write in Right-To-Left direction HTML based > messages, but

[SM-USERS] Adding RTL-LTR buttons to HTML Editor

2013-10-22 Thread David
ions of the editor. Is that the case here and if yes, where/how do I do that? Thanks, David -- October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for

[SM-USERS] scrambled folders after upgrade

2013-01-06 Thread David
ppear to be correct when I look in the mail folders on the server itself. The problem is specific to Squirrel. Any suggestions gratefully received. -- David McQuire 0418 310312 -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-06-20 Thread David C. Rankin
at I only reported to the list to help identify the lines of code in sqmail I had to change to suppress the messages with the new php. Thanks again. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclu

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-06-19 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/15/2012 06:20 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > >I apologize if this list gets two copies of this, but I didn't see the > first > come through. Could the squirrelmail code be setting E_ALL and causing this > problem? I don't see this issue with my o

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-06-15 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/15/2012 11:42 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 06/15/2012 11:26 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > >> >> I'll see if there are any bug reports open with php or Arch on the issue. >> If you can think of anything else, please let me know. Thanks for your >

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-06-15 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/15/2012 11:26 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > > I'll see if there are any bug reports open with php or Arch on the issue. > If you can think of anything else, please let me know. Thanks for your > continued work on squirrelmail! > Paul, Take a look at: https://bug

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-06-15 Thread David C. Rankin
On 05/11/2012 11:57 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 05/10/2012 10:19 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> Thanks, we are aware of this. We do not recommend E_STRICT error reporting. > > Thanks Paul -- that is just the default set by Archlinux with its php install. > I'll look in

[SM-USERS] Unable to forward/reply complete mails from word/outlook 2012 (new MS non-compliance?)

2012-06-14 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul, Tomas, I have an issue that started a month or so ago with users not being able to reply to or forward the complete conversations in 1.5.2 when the message sent is from outlook 2012. I don't know if this is just the latest outlook non-standard compliance showing up as more people use the l

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-05-11 Thread David C. Rankin
On 05/10/2012 10:19 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Thanks, we are aware of this. We do not recommend E_STRICT error reporting. Thanks Paul -- that is just the default set by Archlinux with its php install. I'll look into changing the setting. -- David C. Rankin,

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-05-10 Thread David C. Rankin
On 05/10/2012 02:32 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, all, > > Update today from php 5.3.12 -> 5.4.3 caused a new SquirrelMail notice at > the bottom of the message: > > Category: PHP > Message: Non-static method Message::parseStructure() should not be ca

[SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-05-10 Thread David C. Rankin
ure() parseBodyStructure() or something similar. Let me know if I can send anything else, but the notice looks fairly straightforward. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply/Reply All address incorrect after svn update on 1/6/12 (version 14257:14264M)

2012-01-09 Thread David C. Rankin
Thank you Paul! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops.

Re: [SM-USERS] access from intranet

2012-01-09 Thread David C. Rankin
then of course you will need both forward and reverse zone entries for the squirrelmail server. Bottom line, your boxes on the LAN can't find your squirrelmail server, but that has nothing to do with squirrelmail... P.S. the domain portion of your e-mail address may be

[SM-USERS] Reply/Reply All address incorrect after svn update on 1/6/12 (version 14257:14264M)

2012-01-09 Thread David C. Rankin
What can I send you that would help sort this out? What else can I check? I'm working on getting a copy of one of the emails that is exhibiting this behavior, but I haven't gotten one yet this morning. I welcome all thoughts on this matter. Is anybody else seeing this? -- David C. Ranki

Re: [SM-USERS] Formatted Text

2011-11-16 Thread David
> > David-702 wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Is there a plugin or other method to enable formatting the text in >> SquirrelMail? >> > See html_mail plugin, but it has known issues with international users. Thanks. I in

[SM-USERS] Formatted Text

2011-11-16 Thread David
Hello, Is there a plugin or other method to enable formatting the text in SquirrelMail? Thanks, David -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 - squirrelmail

Re: [SM-USERS] Hebrew Emails/Identities

2011-11-15 Thread David
> Make sure that interface runs in utf-8 and not in default iso-8859-1. If > 'some email clients' display those &#x; as Hebrew characters, they are > broken. Email programs should not interpret plain text messages as html. > Tomas Thanks Tomas, It works perfectly now!!--

[SM-USERS] Hebrew Emails/Identities

2011-11-15 Thread David
hat. Our server is running on Centos 5.X. Thank you in advance, David PS. We do not need Hebrew translation of the webmail itself or anything like that. Just to be able to write in Hebrew in a manner that would be readable by the r

Re: [SM-USERS] Administrator plugin - Add users

2011-11-15 Thread David
abled the administrator plugin through conf.pl, but I don't know how > to add a user that would have these privileges. > > Kindly advise where to set that. > > Thank you in advance, > > David > -- R

[SM-USERS] Administrator plugin - Add users

2011-11-15 Thread David
Hello, I enabled the administrator plugin through conf.pl, but I don't know how to add a user that would have these privileges. Kindly advise where to set that. Thank you in advance,

Re: [SM-USERS] Question on moving mailboxes...

2011-02-24 Thread david . fleskes
I searched again for a solution but did not find one.  I am pretty sure it is simple, but wanted to confirm with an expert.  Is there someone anyone can recommend to call/email? Kindest regards, -David > > > All, > > We are changing an account from (say) us...@foob

[SM-USERS] Question on moving mailboxes...

2011-02-22 Thread david . fleskes
d the FAQ but did not find the instructions to do so.  I would appreciate it If someone has a solution.  Squirrel mail is hosted on a MacOS 10.5.4 G5 platform.  We have admin and root logins.  Please let me know if additional information is needed. Kindest regards, -

Re: [SM-USERS] security scam from 'update.co.uk'

2010-06-08 Thread David Ford
oncerned that my installation is not working properly. > > I saw your post - maybe it got sent to your Junk folder? David > -- > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father&#x

[SM-USERS] mbstring.func_overload = 7 causes multiple warnings from , , /template/Template.class.php & general_util.php

2010-03-09 Thread David C. Rankin
l.php LINE: 39 Category: PHP Message:mb_stristr() [http://www.php.net/function.mb-stristr]: Unknown encoding "(null)" FILE: /srv/http/htdocs/squirrelmail/functions/template/general_util.php LINE: 41 Category: PHP Message:mb_stristr() [http://www.php.net/functio

Re: [SM-USERS] SM Calendar not displaying added events or Saving them.

2010-01-27 Thread David Barnett
it works well like >this, and i can't fault it now. This will probably break during the next update, but at least I know where to look now. If i've made a major catastrophic mistake, please let me know :) Regards, David Barnett Source Computer Services -Original Message

[SM-USERS] SM Calendar not displaying added events or Saving them.

2010-01-21 Thread David Barnett
but haven't? At the moment i have disabled the Calendar plugin since it isn't behaving as it should, but can re-enable for testing. Regards, David Barnett Source Computer Services -- Throughout its 18-year hi

[SM-USERS] feature request for personal address book

2009-10-23 Thread David Reid
ks for the great software. -- David Reid System Administrator NC Conference of the United Methodist Church 919.832.9560 extension 237 800.849.4433 -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is

Re: [SM-USERS] SM won't let users log on, but IMAP does

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 04:34:28 pm David C. Rankin wrote: > Sorry, I completely missed that part. Do you want me to repost my reply in > that thread? > Disregard, I see you took care of it.... -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoch

Re: [SM-USERS] SM won't let users log on, but IMAP does

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 01:21:53 am Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > David C. Rankin wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 October 2009 02:55:27 pm Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > > > >> It's been reported that 1.5.2 does this when using PHP 5.3. I have no > >> idea

Re: [SM-USERS] SM won't let users log on, but IMAP does

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 02:40:58 pm Paul Lesniewski wrote: > I asked you to respond on the more appropriate thread. Please do that > next time. I will reply there. > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:53 PM, David C. Rankin > > wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 October 2009 02:

Re: [SM-USERS] SM won't let users log on, but IMAP does

2009-10-20 Thread David C. Rankin
27;ll get that for you too. Also, I'm serious about the account. I worked with a number of opensource projects that way and never had a problem -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Na

Re: [SM-USERS] SM won't let users log on, but IMAP does

2009-10-20 Thread David C. Rankin
setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /srv/www/htdocs/squirrelmail/src

[SM-USERS] Upgrade to PHP 5.3, sqmail 1.5.2 svn is stuck in a login loop.

2009-08-31 Thread David C. Rankin
have switched back to php 5.2.10 for now and all is fine. Let me know if you have anything you want me to send or try and test (patch, etc.) I have another box with php 5.3 on that I can load squirrelmail on for testing. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree

Re: [SM-USERS] personal information fields are still available afterrunning config.pl

2009-08-13 Thread Batson, David J
Sorry, I meant config/config.php Thanks, Dave Subject: [SM-USERS] personal information fields are still available afterrunning config.pl Hello, I am running version 1.4.8-5.e15.centos.7. I have ran the config.pl script and set the options to edit

[SM-USERS] personal information fields are still available after running config.pl

2009-08-13 Thread Batson, David J
Hello, I am running version 1.4.8-5.e15.centos.7. I have ran the config.pl script and set the options to edit personal information to FALSE. I have checked the OPTIONS.PHP file and they say false as well. But my users are still able to edit this info. What file can I modify to kill the OPTI

[SM-USERS] Receiving emails

2009-08-06 Thread David Gooden
I installed a new server using Redhat Enterprize linux 5. I installed the 1.4.19 version of squirrel mail. I can send email out to anyone. I can send and receive to anyone on the system but I cannot receive from an outside source. Any suggestions? David Gooden Director of Information Systems

Re: [SM-USERS] SECURITY: SquirrelMail Web Server Status, and Plugins Update

2009-07-31 Thread David Ford
Thanks to you and all the team for all your hard work resolving this issue. Having the server compromised is the stuff of all our nightmares. We are grateful for the professional way the issue has been handled. Thank you all again David Ford Jon Angliss wrote: > All, > > We apologie

Re: [SM-USERS] Can't use Squirrelmail with sendmail in Windows

2009-07-23 Thread David Ford
debug log was produced. I believe the way Hi - I think what Paul is saying is that this proves that SquirrelMail is doing what it is configured to do. If you want it to do something different then you need to change the config file. sendmail has lots of flags - it would be better to ask for help in a semdm

Re: [SM-USERS] POP3 mail server- leave messages on the server

2009-07-09 Thread David Ford
oved to 'cur' directory. > > So, does exist a way that I can avoid the moving of the new emails to the > 'cur' directory?? > What about setting up (Outlook, Thunderbird, Evolution, etc.) to use IMAP not pop3? David > John > > > > > Marc Powell wr

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - FATAL ERROR: Data dir (/usr/local/share/sqmail/data/) does not exist!

2009-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 22:22:44 Chris Hilts wrote: > David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote: > > Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction > > in effect. File(/usr/local/share/sqmail/data) is not within the allowed > > path(s): (/srv/http/:/srv/www:/h

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - FATAL ERROR: Data dir (/usr/local/share/sqmail/data/) does not exist!

2009-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 18:19:02 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote: > Paul, > > This one is obviously simple, but it has caught me off-guard. This is > with > sqmail 1.5 svn Rev. 13786. The problem is sqmail can't access the data and > attach directories. Web server wr

[SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - FATAL ERROR: Data dir (/usr/local/share/sqmail/data/) does not exist!

2009-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
ridiculous here. Can you help a brother out? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com -- C

Re: [SM-USERS] 550 error while sending mail to an a/c in squirrellmail

2009-06-16 Thread David Ford
t; They have a problem, not Squirrelmail. > > HTH, > > Karl > > Possibly 'sendmail' (or whatever) is being told, by its configuration, to only listen to port 25 on localhost - and not to listen on the network? Maybe your router doesn't have port 25 open? Definitely not

[SM-USERS] Effect of Dark Theme on Sqmail Skins/Interface

2009-06-07 Thread David C. Rankin
r the next time the color-scheme/layout is being revisited. If I have time to mess with the color definition, I'll post the results to the list for consideration as well. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936)

Re: [SM-USERS] msg_flags plugin safe to install in SM 1.4.17-1?

2009-05-28 Thread david
> > On Fri, 22 May 2009, David Kramer wrote: > >> RPM). I would like to install the msg_flags plugin. Looking at the > >> The problem is, it only comes with patches for up to SM 1.4.15, since >> the plugin hasn't been updated in almost a year, and I'm runn

[SM-USERS] msg_flags plugin safe to install in SM 1.4.17-1?

2009-05-22 Thread David Kramer
I have SquirrelMail 1.4.17-1 running on a Fedora 8 box (installed as RPM). I would like to install the msg_flags plugin. Looking at the install instructions, one must patch squirrelmail, and it comes with different patches for different releases of SquirrelMail. The problem is, it only comes wit

Re: [SM-USERS] TOOOO many emails

2009-04-27 Thread David C. Rankin
d include useful information for us to help you with, > there's nothing anyone can do for you. > This is the "Admin" account, Jeremy do you have root access? If so, and if as you say you don't need the mail, then just delete the mail spool (usually /var/spool/ma

[SM-USERS] Possible Bug with sqmail recognition of user 'http' instead of 'httpd'

2009-04-26 Thread David C. Rankin
an happy to do it. I can't explain why it runs fine on openSuSE with user/group wwwrun/www , but won't run on arch even with the data dir set to 0777 with user/group of http?? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoc

Re: [SM-USERS] Many notice messages on new install concerning mb_xyz [SOLVED]

2009-04-26 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > I have a new install of squirrelmail 1.5 svn on archlinux and accessing > it I > get a lot of notice messages concerning mb_. I know this is > something I'm screwing up, but I can't figure out where the mb_xyz setting is &

[SM-USERS] Many notice messages on new install concerning mb_xyz

2009-04-26 Thread David C. Rankin
template/general_util.php LINE: 41 Category: PHP Message:mb_stristr() [function.mb-stristr]: Unknown encoding "(null)" FILE: /srv/www/htdocs/squirrelmail/functions/template/general_util.php LINE: 45 -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacog

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - Updated to revision 13565 - signout redirect doesn't work? [SOLVED]

2009-04-19 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > I updated to the latest svn for 1.5 (revision 13565) and for some > reason, my > signout page no longer redirects to my home page and instead gives a 403 > error. > My config is: > > $signout_page = SM_PATH . 'conf

[SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - Updated to revision 13565 - signout redirect doesn't work?

2009-04-19 Thread David C. Rankin
eny,allow # Deny from all But, that made no difference. Any thoughts on what I should check next?? Thanks for your great work. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facs

Re: [SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM, David C. Rankin > wrote: >> David C. Rankin wrote: >>> Paul, >> >>> As of rev. 13395, in the compose window, you have two 'send' buttons. >>> The >>> upper one

Re: [SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > As of rev. 13395, in the compose window, you have two 'send' buttons. > The > upper one with all of the other buttons, and then the lower one, standing > alone, under the edit window of the e-mail message. The upper one works

Re: [SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > THE PROBLEM > > As of rev. 13395, in the compose window, you have two 'send' buttons. > The > upper one with all of the other buttons, and then the lower one, standing > alone, under the edit window of the e-mail messag

[SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
t have the same behavior on-click. POOR MAN'S GUESS It looks like the lower button's function is swapped with the 'signature' function. Just thought I would pass it along. As always, I am more than happy to test a patch for you. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin,

Re: [SM-USERS] trunk svn revision 13367 - Can't download attachments

2008-12-18 Thread David C. Rankin
threv=13370 > Thanks Paul, It works fine now! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com ---

[SM-USERS] trunk svn revision 13367 - Can't download attachments

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
Content-Type: application/pdf; name="php_IBM-Ajax-auto-Controls.pdf"\r\n \r\n Let me know what else I can send/post or do to help nail this problem down. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, P

Re: [SM-USERS] Trouble with attachment

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:23 PM, David C. Rankin > wrote: >> Paul Lesniewski wrote: >>> No one else has reported this issue, it works for the rest of us >>> apparently, so there is no reason to think that the code would >>> ma

Re: [SM-USERS] PDFs within squirrelmail

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
ort as 'icehen' and nothing.., I mean nothing, named beagle is ever allowed on my computer ;-) -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. | openSoftware und SystemEntwicklung Rankin Law Firm, PLLC | Countdown for openSuSE 11.1 www.rankinlawfirm.com |

Re: [SM-USERS] trunk svn revision 13367 - Can't download attachments

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, list: > > With the latest update of 1.5 svn to revision 13367, I can no longer > download attachments. Specifically, when trying to download or view > attachments, such as the pdf files shown in the screenshot: > > http://www.311

Re: [SM-USERS] Trouble with attachment

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
e my separate post with wireshark packets. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. | openSoftware und SystemEntwicklung Rankin Law Firm, PLLC | Countdown for openSuSE 11.1 www.rankinlawfirm.com |http://counter.opens

[SM-USERS] trunk svn revision 13367 - Can't download attachments

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
e\r\n Content-Type: application/pdf; name="php_IBM-Ajax-auto-Controls.pdf"\r\n \r\n Let me know what else I can send/post or do to help nail this problem down. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone:

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn rev. 13318 still current

2008-11-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 14:05:00 Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:01 AM, David C. Rankin > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Listmates, > > > >Just checking, is rev. 13318 still current for svn of 1.5? No > > problems, everyt

[SM-USERS] 1.5 svn rev. 13318 still current

2008-11-12 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates, Just checking, is rev. 13318 still current for svn of 1.5? No problems, everything is great with squirrelmail, but it just seems that I haven't seen any recent updates. Maybe squirrelmail is now perfect? Thanks! -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLL

Re: [SM-USERS] Unable To Send Mail From Web

2008-09-04 Thread David Ford
Hi Carlos Carlos Williams wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Carlos Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Lorenzo Luengo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Maybe you could add the ip of the squirrelmail server to the trusted >>> relay addresses in po

Re: [SM-USERS] SM "notice messages" in Addressbook ( undefined constant SMOPT_SIZE_NORMAL)

2008-09-01 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:19 PM, David C. Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul Lesniewski wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:45 PM, David C. Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Listmates, New install of SM 1.5.2 svn (revision 13268) on openSuSE 11.

Re: [SM-USERS] recent stable 1.5.x release?

2008-08-26 Thread David C. Rankin
running the latest without any problems. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com - This SF.Net em

Re: [SM-USERS] SM "notice messages" in Addressbook ( undefined constant SMOPT_SIZE_NORMAL)

2008-08-26 Thread David C. Rankin
xed. Excellent. Thank you. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com - This SF.Net email is sp

Re: [SM-USERS] SM "notice messages" in Addressbook ( undefined constant SMOPT_SIZE_NORMAL)

2008-08-25 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:19 PM, David C. Rankin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Paul Lesniewski wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:45 PM, David C. Rankin >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Listmates, >>&g

Re: [SM-USERS] SM "notice messages" in Addressbook ( undefined constant SMOPT_SIZE_NORMAL)

2008-08-25 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:45 PM, David C. Rankin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Listmates, >> >>New install of SM 1.5.2 svn (revision 13268) on openSuSE 11.0 i386 >> (php5-5.2.6-0.1, apache2-2.2.8-28.1) and I am getting a la

[SM-USERS] SM "notice messages" in Addressbook ( undefined constant SMOPT_SIZE_NORMAL)

2008-08-25 Thread David C. Rankin
f it? Thanks for any help you can give. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com - This SF.Ne

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug: Replies from subfolders not placed in sent mail on 1.5.2 or 1.4.14 with UW imap

2008-04-01 Thread David C. Rankin
Antonio wrote: > Hi David: > > I was wondering if you were able to sort out the issue you mentioned with your post: "Bug: Replies from subfolders not placed in sent mail on 1.5.2 or 1.4.14 with UW imap". > > I am having the exact same problem. > > Cheers,

  1   2   3   4   5   >