Re: [SM-USERS] Most secure way of authentication

2007-05-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu 2007-05-03 14:36:39 -0400, Rainer Sokoll wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:49:21AM -0700, Don Russell wrote: >> Rainer Sokoll wrote: > >> > RedirectMatch permanent ^/(.*) https://webmail.example.com/$1 > >> Though that may work in many case

Re: [SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages

2007-05-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu 2007-05-03 12:23:17 -0400, Bob wrote: > The squirrelmail functionality is fine, just very very very > slow. Any thoughts? I'm stumped. This sounds like it could potentially be a DNS timeout. Is squirrelmail trying to look up DNS information,

Re: [SM-USERS] What is the best apache/php configuration if you only need squirrelmail?

2007-05-01 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue 2007-05-01 13:07:56 -0400, M. Fioretti wrote: > must this be done at every boot, or is this for playing with modules > without restarting the whole server? Can't modules be turned off for > good in the configuration file? a2enmod and a2dismod

Re: [SM-USERS] What is the best apache/php configuration if you only need squirrelmail?

2007-05-01 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue 2007-05-01 02:50:49 -0400, M. Fioretti wrote: > Am I right? If yes, what are the best tips, tricks and configuration > options (for apache and php) to make such a system as secure as > possible and as light on the cpu as possible? As a debian

Re: [SM-USERS] Duplicate Meessages Sent

2007-04-25 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed 2007-04-25 21:00:54 -0400, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > If there are three hits in the web log as you've shown, I think > there is not much chance it'd be a SM problem. The request *did* > appear to actually come three times. Unless there were so