Hello,
I would like to have both my TRASH folder and my SPAM folder auto-delete
messages contained in them after a certain period of time. Is there any way
to do this?
Thanks,
Clair
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spam-Auto-Delete--tf4403366.html#a12561926
Sent from
OK. It does seem like a browser issue. I'll work with the user to see if
we can clear it up.
Thanks, all.
Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> On 4/25/07, Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, I've asked the user to check her computer. She's using Saf
No, the ids are different, and on the server I see three separate
messages in the logs. In the apache logs on sqmail, I also see three
separate "compose" lines. The content, however, is identical.
Rainer Sokoll wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:03:02PM -0400, Lesli St
ting Send three times, etc.).
I've Googled and searched lists, but it's not an easy topic with unique
keywords.
Marc Powell wrote:
...
--
***
Lesli St. Clair
Systems Administrator
Ithaca College
607-274-1000
--
I'm not following; why would that cause my sqmail server to send three
times?
Marc Powell wrote:
> I know this sounds like a strange suggestion but check the date/time on
> the senders computer. I'll bet it is very wrong.
>
> --
> Marc
>
>
--
with Safari) or with a public kiosk. None of the
messages she's sent to me have been duplicated, but the above example was
sent to a colleague in IT.
We're running 1.4.9.
Thanks.
--
Lesli St. Clair
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Hi All,
We were having this problem before, and then we switched
register_globals to off, and it seemed fixed. But now suddenly we are
seeing this message again, after not having changed anything.
The error occurs when trying to view a message containing a jpg
attachment a second time. In this
On 10/6/05, Chris Hilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> kristina clair wrote:
> > We have had several reports of SM user settings disappearing. What
> > seems to happen is that every once in a while, a user will l
Hello,
We have had several reports of SM user settings disappearing. What
seems to happen is that every once in a while, a user will log in and
all the personal information and preferences will not show up in the
options section. If they log out and log back in again, the settings
reappear.
I'm
Hi,
I just upgraded to the latest squirrelmail, and I'm using php 4.3.10.
When I try to view bounced messages, I'm able to view them the first
time. But if I go back to the Inbox and then try to view the message
again, I get the error:
Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in
/
It's odd that the defaults on such a box were
below 8192! But yeah, that'd definitely cause performance issues (or
outright failures) with the kernel holding the httpd's back due to lack of
descriptors. Ouch...
Anyway, glad to hear things are working!
John
begin:vcar
urceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
.
begin:vcard
fn:Lesli St. Clair
n:St. Clair;Lesli
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
version:2.1
end:vcard
has 500 users logging in 5 seconds apart, with
no problems yet.
begin:vcard
fn:Lesli St. Clair
n:St. Clair;Lesli
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
version:2.1
end:vcard
ly on the more powerful 4-CPU system.
So the load problem is caused by whatever SM does at login--the first
mail pull? caching? sorting?
begin:vcard
fn:Lesli St. Clair
n:St. Clair;Lesli
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
version:2.1
end:vcard
sure that the search order is NIS -> PASSWD file
If the password file is searched every login ( sequentally )
that might create a high load even if the user exists in NIS..
Just my 2 cents..
/Sqm
begin:vcard
fn:Lesli St. Clair
n:St. Clair;Lesli
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
version:2.1
end:vcard
ing larger percentages of CPU time?
John
begin:vcard
fn:Lesli St. Clair
n:St. Clair;Lesli
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
version:2.1
end:vcard
Always from source! And yes, fresh php, too. It was an untouched machine
that hadn't been used for anything else.
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I thought of that, but I tried a fresh install of apache 2.x
From source?
What about PHP?
begin:vcard
13M sleep0:14 1.33% httpd
6839 httpd 1 520 19M 17M sleep0:15 1.31% httpd
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Fresh install of apache 1.3x, SM, and mysql, but the same revs etc.
Maybe a bug in the software? I've seen that on RH syste
Fresh install of apache 1.3x, SM, and mysql, but the same revs etc.
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was absolutely convinced that something was misconfigured when I saw
the LA over 80. So I moved it to anther, identical machine and got the
same thing.
2004 11:21:56 -0500, Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I've been struggling with SquirrelMail for two months. At about 300
users, the CPU is maxed out and the load average on a dual-Ghz CPU Sun
machine climbs into the 80s. I moved it to a larger, 4-processor box and
did l
or this. In fact, our mail set up is pretty complex now.
Adding a different imap would make that worse. What I see in testing is
that the load goes way up on the initial login, then levels out. I
assume that's the sorting problem.
begin:vcard
fn:Lesli St. Clair
n:St. Clair;Lesli
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
version:2.1
end:vcard
I suspect it is the SM/iPlanet combo. But I can't change our email
infrastructure just for a webmail interface. I'm disappointed, because I
do like SM.
Norrin Radd wrote:
Lesli st. Clair,
Sorry to hear about your pain and suffering. Although
I have only fractions of expertise of the
IMAP users out there? Any last advice before I ditch
SM? Any other load issues out there?
begin:vcard
fn:Lesli St. Clair
n:St. Clair;Lesli
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
version:2.1
end:vcard
r configuration? With or without similar
problems?
Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
Lesli St. Clair paraÅÄ:
All,
I have SM running on a Sun 280, dual processor, 4 GB machines, Sol 8,
apache 1.3.7, php 4.3.2. We're using a variety of plugins for ldap
connectivity, including some home grown (though removing t
--
--
1 & 2 were done during installation.
>
> 3. conf.pl -> 8. Plugins -> filters should not be installed
The filter plugin was installed. I'll test without, but I assumed removing
the plugin was a "tuning" issue, not the difference between a smooth
running machine and a system collapsing unde
I tend to agree. I'm (trying) to run SM on a dual processor Sun with 4
GB, solely as a web client (IMAP and smtp are elsewhere) and 300 or so
simultaneous users uses up all the processor. And that's with a PHP
accellerator (Zend). I'm still poling around trying to find some way to
make this wor
of site once we have 300
or so simultaneous users. Several times the LA hit the 80s before I
killed apache.
Is this a configuration issue? I'm assuming that this hardware should be
hardy enough for even 1,000 simultaneous connections.
begin:vcard
fn:Lesli St. Clair
n:St. Clair;Lesli
e
27 matches
Mail list logo
