Re: [SM-USERS] Problems with SM sessions via a proxy server?

2005-07-28 Thread Chris Green
the session parameters for Squirremail must be stored somewhere locally (cookies?) on the computer and they're being 'shared' with the conequences you see. I don't see how this could relate at all to the OP's problem where it's happening between two physically

Re: [SM-USERS] Folders seem to be broken by 'local' reorganisation

2005-06-16 Thread Chris Green
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:29:08AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > Have you tried the folders option on the top SM toolbar? This allows > you to subsribe / un-subscribe from folders on your IMAP server. > That's what I meant by folders option. -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED

[SM-USERS] Folders seem to be broken by 'local' reorganisation

2005-06-16 Thread Chris Green
in another posting I really need to be able to limit the folder frame to showing only one level of the hierarchy to make things usable. -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-16 Thread Chris Green
easily see every folder on a single screen (I usually use mutt) at any given level. A means of collapsing and expanding the folder display would be OK but really I'd just prefer to see only the folders at the level where I am. -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-16 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Hello Chris Green, > On Wednesday, June 15, 2005, you wrote: > > >> I have seen questions about this but no answers. > >> > >> Sub-folders of INBOX are listed below any folder below INBOX

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 03:35:10PM +0200, Marc Groot Koerkamp wrote: > > Chris Green wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > > >> > >> 1: INBOX designated base folder for other protocols such as POP and as > >> a

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
es not work in a vacuum. Sometimes web mail is used to > back up other mail clients. This is a play nicely with others (use the > same recycle bin etc). > Even more reason for allowing it all to be set by the user surely, which is what was suggesting. -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
ers are displayed below the wrong top > level folder. I like the concept of hierarchy, I don't like sub > folders that jump from INBOX to a new folder called AtWork just > because it is between A & I in the alphabet. As I said that se

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
folders is to simplify things, at the top level I want to see only my top level folders. Then if I select one of them I want to see only the sub-folders of the selected folder. This would address most of your problem I would have thought because you'd never have a long list to scroll throug

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
have been in if INBOX was not locked to the top. > Yes, I quite agree, it's effectively what I was saying when I said the name INBOX is purely part of the communication mechanism between the MUA and the server. There is no need at all for the user to have to put up with the name INBOX, n

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 10:56:47AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:23:16AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > > On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
ers appearing all over the place is just what I don't want, especially as each MUA has its own ideas of what to call them so I get several versions of each. -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence."

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:23:16AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 08:59:26AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > > I have seen questions about this but no answers. > > > > > >

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
s bad. Why should I always have a folder called Trash? I might want to call it something else or I might want mail to be really deleted when I delete it. -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence." --

Re: [SM-USERS] How to subscribe to LOTS of folders?

2005-06-14 Thread Chris Green
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:15:04PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > > > Click Folders, in the subscription box, click on the folders you want > > to subscribe, hold down the ctrl key to click on multiples, or if you > > want to subscribe to them all in the box, select the

Re: [SM-USERS] How to subscribe to LOTS of folders?

2005-06-14 Thread Chris Green
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:43:14AM -0500, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Hello Chris Green, > On Tuesday, June 14, 2005, you wrote: > > > Is there an easy/quick way to subscribe to lots of mail folders in > > squirrel mail? > > > I have a mail archive which has som

[SM-USERS] How to subscribe to LOTS of folders?

2005-06-14 Thread Chris Green
s you to toggle the 'wrong' use of SUBSCRIBE on and off. -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence." --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Gu