Re: [SM-USERS] Did not like Squirrelmail.

2005-01-10 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:42:58AM -0700, Jimmy Porter wrote: > It worked for a while until I saw what I was missing. I cancelled > squirrel-mail and went back to apple-mail. Now I can have colored > type, all kinds of styles, pictures and moving art. I do not know why > I used squirrel-mail,

Re: [SM-USERS] Permission denied error in /home/user/

2004-06-11 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 01:19:46AM -0700, Spiro Azkoul wrote: > I am getting the following message in the upper left hand corner after I log > on to my squirrelmail I suspect it is a permission problem? Any feedback > would help. > > Anyone seen anything like this before? > > ERROR: > ERROR : C

Re: [SM-USERS] TMDA

2004-04-16 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:19:53PM -0400, Joaquim Laureano wrote: > Could you please say what C/R means? Thank you. Challenge/Response. Basically, if your mail system receives mail from someone it doesn't know about, it holds on to it, sends a challenge to the alleged sender and doesn't deliver

Re: [SM-USERS] TMDA

2004-04-16 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:46:41PM -0700, Rick Castello wrote: > > Quite simply: much spam now forges genuine e-mail addresses and most > > spam forges genuine domain names. This means that every challenge that > > you send out is wasting somebody else's time and adding to the load they > > alread

Re: [SM-USERS] TMDA

2004-04-11 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 11:43:23PM -0700, Rick Castello wrote: > How does C/R shift my spam problem (remember, thousands of spam > messages a day) into someone else's mailbox (other than MAYBE the > spammers themselves, who frankly, I don't give a damn about)? > Quite simply: much

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 07:45:09AM -0700, Avery Day wrote: > > I have looked at both cyrus and courier. The complete blackbox setup that > cyrus can do seems to be its major selling point. Also the extremely flexible ACL system (best I've seen of any IMAP server, open or proprietary). The delive

Re: [SM-USERS] TMDA

2004-04-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 04:52:47AM -0700, p dont think wrote: > Yes, the two are fairly independent. There is a problem in that the > outgoing addresses created by the tmda-sendmail wrapper may not be > "reply-able", depending on your system setup. > > The current TMDA plugin has been deprecated

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:44:16PM -0700, Avery Day wrote: > Does anyone think going completely webmail based using squirrelmail for > the MUA is a bad idea? Does anyone have any thoughts on this at all? Is > there anyone in this mailing list that has done this before? If so I would > love to hear

Re: [SM-USERS] HELO request

2004-04-04 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:25:47PM -0800, p dont think wrote: > >> One of our customer is using > >> Squirrel Mail as their email server. > > > > SquirrelMail is an IMAP server > > This is excellent! I'm going to install SM as my refridgerator next week, > I'll keep you all posted on how it does.

Re: [SM-USERS] HELO request

2004-03-25 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 04:10:20PM +0530, Vikram Derebail wrote: > Hi, > > We are a company which develops network enabled monitoring devices, and > our device can SNMP traps, E-mail etc. One of our customer is using > Squirrel Mail as their email server. They have customized that as to not > to

Re: [SM-USERS] Original msg format distorted in Reply

2003-09-21 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:12:54AM +0800, Michael Lai wrote: > Not trying to be an a** or anything but how am I suppose to show the > distorted format of my "html" message if I don't send it in html? Easily. An html message is a text file, You can open the html in a text editor and then paste

Re: [SM-USERS] Original msg format distorted in Reply

2003-09-20 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:44:33PM +0800, Michael Lai wrote: > > > > > > > > I have successfully installed squirrelmail 1.4.1 but I have a problem > with replying to emails, especially html emails.  In the compose text > box, the format of the original email would be all distorted.  For

Re: [SM-USERS] Fine tunning squirrelmail

2003-09-04 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:39:32PM -0700, p dont think wrote: > Moreover, please please please upgrade to the HTML_Mail plugin, which > does not require you to make all the customized modifications that > HTMLArea does (and doesn't have any of the bugs...) One extra incentive: spamassassin has bee

Re: [SM-USERS] Message Size Plugin

2003-08-22 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 04:10:44PM +1000, Peter Kiem wrote: > Hi, > > > No... but then there is no need when SquirrelMail does it itself. > > Archives would have revealed this little titbit... > > > > Options - Index Order - Add Size. > > Any reason why this is not the default? You can make it

Re: [SM-USERS] Thread Sorting Error with CGatePro

2003-07-22 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 08:21:40AM -0700, Karstyn McCoy wrote: > I'm using the current stable releases of both Squirrelmail and Communigate > Pro. However SquirrelMails thread sorting throws an error: > 'Thread sorting not supported by your email server'. Then the red error > message at the top of

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Delete Folders problem

2003-07-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:01:21PM +0100, Daniel Watts wrote: > Hi I'm running the University of Washington IMAP. > > I don't understand how the imap server would factor in...doesn't SM just > search the mail directory for files and directories? SM doesn't search for any such thing. It uses the

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] FW: SecurityFocus Linux Newsletter #137 - Squirrelmail issues

2003-06-23 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:44:07PM +0200, Marc Groot Koerkamp wrote: > I'm not sure it's up to SM to fix this because if we fix it ( == not > returning imap server messages in case of NO responses ) users can still > access /etc/passwd by a simple telnet session. It's entirely possible that the im

[SM-USERS] Urgent! experimental Folder Synch plugin can delete emails before you see them

2003-06-05 Thread Bruce Richardson
A few weeks ago, a proposed new version of the Folder Synch plugin was posted to the plugins list which actually worked, as opposed to the current official version which only works properly for one broken version of IE. Unfortunately, the test version can delete mail with no user intervention in s

[SM-USERS] New messages are going straight to Trash

2003-05-30 Thread Bruce Richardson
Our staff have been seeing a small number of incoming messages move straight to the trash folder with no user intervention. I've seen this happen myself - heard it, even, because the Newmail pop-up window chokes on the sound file when it happens. Has anybody else experienced this? I seem to reca

Re: [SM-USERS] Autocomplte plugin problem

2003-05-29 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 04:41:39PM +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote: > > Dear List, > I have installed auto complete plugin. It installed and appended > Auto complete box under the display preferences.when I submit the > "Display Preferences" It is giving the following Error. > *

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail ISP-Usage

2003-05-27 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 01:50:48AM -0700, p dont think wrote: > > 3. Set up preferences to be taken from a database. You could then do > > something as simple as making the preferences table read-only to > > SquirrelMail (or, to be precise, to the user account through which SM > > connects to the

Re: [SM-USERS] question about IMAP usage in SquirrelMail

2003-03-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 10:29:06PM +0800, Greg Hosler wrote: > Hi, > > SquirrelMail newbie. > > I am setting up SM on my apache server located in a DMZ. I need to know whether > the SM usage of the IMAP server is from the client side (i.e. from the html/php > executing within the client browser),

Re: [SM-USERS] (no subject)

2003-02-25 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:01:54AM -0800, Paul DeHerrera wrote: > Hello, > > I am new to the list, so I apologize if this topic has already been covered. > I have an older_than_current version of SquirrelMail running and I have done > a number of customizations. I would like to add the new Return

Bad HTML message (Re: [SM-USERS] Behavior Modification for Delete_Move_Next)

2003-02-21 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:24:04PM -0500, Dan Davis wrote: Nothing that immediately appeared in my e-mail client, mutt, because it was a pure html message with no accompanying text version. Is this because the htmlarea plugin has been misconfigured in this case or is it how the plugin always work

Re: [SM-USERS] folder_synch not working properly with IE6

2003-02-19 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 05:25:42PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > I've spent most of a day trying to trace this problem and the confusing > thing is that the folder_sync_left function *is* being called. However, > its output is not appearing in the left_main frame. I tried IE5 an

[SM-USERS] folder_synch not working properly with IE6

2003-02-19 Thread Bruce Richardson
We recently upgraded IE on all our Windows workstations to 6.0, specifically to deal with some problems that IE has with SquirrelMail (e.g. not handling attachments properly). It fixed those problems but seems to have caused another one - the "Folder list update forces message list update" option

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: SM scalability (was UW replacement)

2003-02-19 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:06:03AM -0500, Rob Prince wrote: > I want to know how to design a system such as this that _is_ scalable, and > squirrelmail being a part of it is a must. How would I design a system > that is scalable to many thousands of users using SM? For a start, use a database to s

Re: [SM-USERS] Subfolders

2003-02-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:29:32PM -0600, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Unfortunately UW-IMAP doesn't allow for that to happen. What I mean is > UW has two states... it's a folder, or a file. UW doesn't allow for > mail to be stored in a folder, but a folder can contain files, which > in turn can conta

[SM-USERS] SM can't cope with some legal IMAP folder names

2003-02-13 Thread Bruce Richardson
Squirrelmail 1.2.x seems to have a problem with mailbox names containing an ampersand or ones that end in spaces (probably ones that begin with spaces as well). These are all legal names, I think. -- Bruce I am now a little wary of bananas. msg02891/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SM-USERS] subfolder fall under Sent

2002-12-22 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 05:02:01PM -0800, Caffeinate The World wrote: > SquirrelMail 1.2.10 > Courier-Imap > Qmail > > I have a folder called "INBOX.PostgreSQL.v723" created. However, it's > listed on the side bar indented under Sent instead of PostgreSQL. In the config options do you have the de

Re: [SM-USERS] Hosting squirrelmail on seperate box to mail server

2002-12-21 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 12:03:56PM +, Mark C wrote: > On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 05:45, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > > > > 2. Doing this, would this increase my security to my mail server? > > > > It'd allow you to not run an additional service (httpd) on the > > server, but then you have the pla

[SM-USERS] Sorting choice being forgotten

2002-12-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
It seems that the stable branch can no longer remember which sorting settings (Subject, date, ascending, desending) a person has set. Users whose accounts were created more than a few days ago have no problem but users whose accounts were created in the last few days have problems. When they click

Re: [SM-USERS] Possible Plugging

2002-12-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:50:12PM -0800, Joe Oaks wrote: > Hey plugging guys, here is an Idea, I would not think it would > be that hard to do and maybe someone has already done it. > > Is there a way to get a plugging that will filter the mail as > it is downloaded and filter it into folders

[SM-USERS] Re: *FIX* re: Session Issues, need testers

2002-12-15 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:12:28AM -0600, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > This is most unusual. PHP says you can remove a cookie just by > providing it's name, or setting it's time back in time to cause the > browser to expire it. I guess they incorrectly stated that then. I'll > update the code appro

[SM-USERS] Re: [SM-STABLE] *FIX* re: Session Issues, need testers

2002-12-15 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 02:20:45AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > That doesn't help. However, I noticed that another thing you changed > was that the setcookie calls in sqsession_destroy no longer uses > $base_uri as the cookie path. This is definitely an error. It creates, &

[SM-USERS] *FIX* re: Session Issues, need testers

2002-12-15 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 12:43:31PM -0600, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > > Makes no sense as line 153 is > > > } else { > > argh... my PC crashed when I was writing the original email, and the > devel one got the line the stable should have got. Line 153 *should* > say 157 I believe (the end

[SM-USERS] Login failure since cvs upgrade

2002-12-13 Thread Bruce Richardson
At the beginning of last week I was able to use SM perfectly well, using the latest STABLE cvs code. Today I updated to the latest CVS and now I can't log in. This is the message shown in the log: [13-Dec-2002 17:31:06] PHP Warning: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the

Re: [SM-USERS] Suggestion

2002-11-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:54:01AM +0200, Alexandros Vellis wrote: > On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:37:00 + > Bruce Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No, it will be able access them if you add the subscription > > server-side. But as far as I can see, Squir

Re: [SM-USERS] help....!!!!

2002-11-15 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:47:54PM -0600, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Hello Nestor, > On Friday, November 15, 2002, Nestor Pereira wrote... > > > I am using in SquirrelMail version 1,2,9 and must appears to me following > > error..You be logged in to Access this page... in this case that I can do.

Re: [SM-USERS] Date with Squirrelmail

2002-11-12 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 03:09:37PM -0600, Hoover wrote: > I have a small problem. When I log into SM, and go to my inbox. > It show's the From, Date, Subject. > > My problem is, for the date. It only shows 11:56am but no date. > It's only showing the time the email was received but no date. Any

Re: [SM-USERS] Left Frame

2002-11-01 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 12:46:30PM -0500, Rick Castello wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 05:39:07PM +0100, Pong wrote: > >> Hoover sagde: > >> > I was wondering if anyone knew where to edit to make the left frame > >> a little wider. > >> > I'm getting a scroll bar, and dont want that there. > >>

Re: [SM-USERS] threaded view

2002-10-30 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 05:10:11PM -0500, Mail List wrote: > I tried this and get some error about "mail server doesn't support > threading" message... I think SM only supports server-side threading. -- Bruce I object to intellect without discipline. I object to power without constructive pur