Re: [SM-USERS] Shared Calendar 2.0.1

2006-05-22 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Sander Smeenk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > but i'm running into trouble trying to import the previous /shared/ > calendar. So eventually I even took a look at what the structure in /var/lib/squirrelmail/data/calendar_data looked like if i created a shared calendar and created an

[SM-USERS] Shared Calendar 2.0.1

2006-05-22 Thread Sander Smeenk
Hi, I'm trying to upgrade from Shared Calendar 1.1 to the latest version available on squirrelmail.org, 2.0.1. It works like a charm, automatically converting personal calendars to the new iCal format(?), but i'm running into trouble trying to import the previous /shared/ calendar. We use the ad

Re: [SM-USERS] Please unsubscribe me from list

2005-07-30 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Rajeev Sharma ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Thanks a lot for all for their valuable help. > Its time to say good bye. > Please unsubscribe from mailing list. Check the headers of every message on this list: | List-Unsubscribe: O

[SM-USERS] [SOLVED] Squirrelmail 'Must be logged in'

2005-07-30 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Sander Smeenk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Since a while, unfortunately i don't exactly know when it happened, i > can't log in to my squirrelmail setup anymore. Every time I try, i end > up with a page telling me i need to log in to access that page. The > URL-bar then

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 'Must be logged in'

2005-07-29 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > What I do notice is that on the [EMAIL PROTECTED], there's all these sess_* > > files in /tmp, none of those appear on my own server. > This here is likely to be your issue... for some reason, your session > files aren't being created, and because

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 'Must be logged in'

2005-07-28 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Sander Smeenk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I'm running SquirrelMail 1.4.4, Debian package revision 6sarge1. > Courier IMAP 3.0.8 Debian package revision 4. I'm still having the same problem. I've downgraded squirrelmail to 1.4.4 deb-rev 5, to no avail. My own server i

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 'Must be logged in'

2005-07-27 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Chris Hilts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Did you disable cookies in your web browser? Are you running through a > cookie crunching proxy? It just looks like the session isn't stored anywhere. I get the cookies. When i set it to 'ask every time', and click the "Go to the login page"-link, i ge

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 'Must be logged in'

2005-07-27 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Chris Hilts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Since a while, unfortunately i don't exactly know when it happened, i > > can't log in to my squirrelmail setup anymore. Every time I try, i end > > up with a page telling me i need to log in to access that page. The > > URL-bar then shows webmail.php.

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 'Must be logged in'

2005-07-27 Thread Sander Smeenk
Hey, Since a while, unfortunately i don't exactly know when it happened, i can't log in to my squirrelmail setup anymore. Every time I try, i end up with a page telling me i need to log in to access that page. The URL-bar then shows webmail.php. I did some tests and found my Courier IMAP server t

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail not showing mail in folders?

2005-02-15 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > I'd say. Could there be a posibility that PHP might be involved? Since > > we've somewhat outruled imap as the culprit, being it that mutt and > > tbird just work like a charm... > I wouldn't have thought it was a PHP issue, unless there is an erro

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail not showing mail in folders?

2005-02-14 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > This might seem a little crazy, but have you double checked to make > sure that somehow, a second IMAP server isn't running on just > localhost? Yes. I ensured myself of the fact that only one IMAP server (courier imapd) was running. > It'd seem re

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail not showing mail in folders?

2005-02-14 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Did you try subscribing to your INBOX? > Now see if it appears. I just subscribed my own INBOX. The system shows INBOX, but i still can't click on it to open it. > > Yes, still, "mutt -f imap://server/"; shows the mails correct > That is most unusu

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail not showing mail in folders?

2005-02-14 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > After last upgrade to SM 1.4.4-3 (Debian Unstable) > Are you sure it was 1.4.4 you upgraded to? 1.5.0 had a bug where if you > were not subscribed to the INBOX, it'd make it so it wasn't selectable. I'm pretty sure it's 1.4.4-3 i'm running now ;

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail not showing mail in folders?

2005-02-14 Thread Sander Smeenk
-3 traditional model for Apache2 ii courier-imap 3.0.8-4Courier Mail Server - IMAP server ii courier-authda 0.47-4 Courier Mail Server - Authentication ii squirrelmail 1.4.4-3Webmail for nuts ii squirrelmail-l 1.4.4-20050122 Translations for the SquirrelMai

Re: [SM-USERS] Undefined offset: %d in filters/filters.php line %d

2004-09-20 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Sander Smeenk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Okay, so, on random moments my users report seeing the message: > PHP Notice: Undefined offset: 1 in [path]/plugins/filters/filters.php on line 280 > It looks like the data returned by the IMAP server fails some expected > format, since i

[SM-USERS] Undefined offset: %d in filters/filters.php line %d

2004-09-09 Thread Sander Smeenk
Hello! I'm deploying SquirrelMail at work and at my private server for my users to read their mail in. And recently I heard that some of my users are experiencing 'problems' with their mailfilters (from the filters/filters.php plugin). I'm not sure if this is the correct place to query about this

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL problem

2002-12-02 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Dimitrios Stergiou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Why use two trees in the first place? > Actually all i want is the ssl tree. when i saw that i have certain problems, > i also installed under a non-ssl tree to make a test. Okay, so you can't forward messages while using SSL, do you get any er

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail stable with Apache2

2002-12-02 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting kazh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Can someone tell me when a new version will be able to work without > problem on Apache2 . I run SM on Apache2 without any problems ? -- | If peanut butter cookies are made from peanut butter, | then what are Girl Scout cookies made out of? | 1024D/08CEC94D -

Re: RE : [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail stable with Apache2

2002-12-02 Thread 'Sander Smeenk'
Quoting kazh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Can someone tell me when a new version will be able to work without > > > problem on Apache2 . > > > > I run SM on Apache2 without any problems ? > > Yes, maybe you use the correct -DEV version of PHP ;-) I run php version 4.2.3-3 (from Debian Packages).

Re: [SM-USERS] Message Highliting Plugin

2002-12-02 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Brent S. Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > It should be able to group multiple items for a color. Currently this isn't possible because it doesn't use regular expressions to match the words / names you want to hilight, or if it does, it doesn't accept user-created regexen. I just checked, in

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL problem

2002-12-02 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Dimitrios Stergiou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > i have installed squirel mail 1.2.9 and i face the following problem > i have installed it under 2 identical trees, one for ssl and one for non-ssl > access > when i use the non-ssl tree, everything works fine > when i use the ssl tree, i can't fo

Re: [SM-USERS] SM vs IMAP/SSL

2002-11-01 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Harold Hallikainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Are others generally running SM over SSL? I run SM on https with self made and self signed certs. Works like a charm, but yes, you have to keep up to date with security releases ;) -- | Year, n.: A period of three hundred and sixty-five di