Re: [SM-USERS] Reply-To field

2013-10-16 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:36 AM, LuKreme wrote: > A user complained that she was not getting any mail replies. Mail that was > not a reply was fine. After investigating, I saw that she had put her full > name into the reply to field. > > Evidently, there's no checking on this input to ensure tha

[SM-USERS] Reply-To field

2013-10-16 Thread LuKreme
A user complained that she was not getting any mail replies. Mail that was not a reply was fine. After investigating, I saw that she had put her full name into the reply to field. Evidently, there's no checking on this input to ensure that it contains an email address, or at least an @ sign. I