On Mon, March 22, 2010 11:01 pm, Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
> 2010.03.23 00:14 Karl Pearson raÅ¡Ä:
>> [apologies for top-posting. Those who want to know what this solution is
>> about, read below my top-post.]
>>
>> Final: Counting is fine now. The true count is being show in all cases
>> and
>> reg
2010.03.23 00:14 Karl Pearson rašė:
> [apologies for top-posting. Those who want to know what this solution is
> about, read below my top-post.]
>
> Final: Counting is fine now. The true count is being show in all cases and
> regardless of how deep my nested folders go.
Not in all cases. Cumulativ
Are you the System Admin?
On Mar 22, 2010, at 3:59 PM, mick crane wrote:
> ignore previous
> i think I pasted address in to field incomplete and other issue
> probably
> yahoo.
>
>>> squirrel mail is really, really good
>>> (but you knew that)
>> having said that a couple of sent emails have go
ignore previous
i think I pasted address in to field incomplete and other issue probably
yahoo.
>> squirrel mail is really, really good
>> (but you knew that)
> having said that a couple of sent emails have gone missing just now.
> probably it is something I have screwed up but you would think if
mick crane wrote:
> squirrel mail is really, really good
> (but you knew that)
having said that a couple of sent emails have gone missing just now.
probably it is something I have screwed up but you would think if it
worked once it should work twice. the common denominator is yahoo.
did anybody ha
[apologies for top-posting. Those who want to know what this solution is
about, read below my top-post.]
Final: Counting is fine now. The true count is being show in all cases and
regardless of how deep my nested folders go.
A thanks to Tomas for your help!
Karl
--
On Sat, M
squirrel mail is really, really good
(but you knew that)
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel pe
>>After vetting 1.4.20 on a development server, I rolled it out to
>> my colocated server successfully.
>>
>>Since then, the performance in the web interface has taken a
>> pretty bad hit. With 1.4.19, bringing up each email was almost
>> instantaneous, now there is a several second lag b
C. Bensend wrote:
>
>
> Hey folks,
>
>After vetting 1.4.20 on a development server, I rolled it out to
> my colocated server successfully.
>
>Since then, the performance in the web interface has taken a
> pretty bad hit. With 1.4.19, bringing up each email was almost
> instantaneous,
Hey folks,
After vetting 1.4.20 on a development server, I rolled it out to
my colocated server successfully.
Since then, the performance in the web interface has taken a
pretty bad hit. With 1.4.19, bringing up each email was almost
instantaneous, now there is a several second lag betwee
michael crane-2 wrote:
>
>
> Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
>> 2010.03.22 12:05 mick crane raÅ¡Ä:
>>> Hi,
>>> Everything seems to be working on my local installation.
>>> I have clamav dovecot procmail postfix but as yet haven't seen a simple
>>> way to pass the emails through clamav.
>>> Do I need to
Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
> 2010.03.22 12:05 mick crane raÅ¡Ä:
>> Hi,
>> Everything seems to be working on my local installation.
>> I have clamav dovecot procmail postfix but as yet haven't seen a simple
>> way to pass the emails through clamav.
>> Do I need to install something else to use clamav ?
2010.03.22 12:05 mick crane rašė:
> Hi,
> Everything seems to be working on my local installation.
> I have clamav dovecot procmail postfix but as yet haven't seen a simple
> way to pass the emails through clamav.
> Do I need to install something else to use clamav ?
a) integrate clamav into procm
Hi,
Everything seems to be working on my local installation.
I have clamav dovecot procmail postfix but as yet haven't seen a simple
way to pass the emails through clamav.
Do I need to install something else to use clamav ?
cheers
mick
--
http://mickiwiki.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
