Re: [SM-USERS] "change_passwd" or "compatibility" pluging produce error in "Options"

2010-02-14 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Michelle, Du meintest am 15.02.10: >>> What can this be? >> Please follow the mailing list posting guidelines and SEARCH before >> asking. > I was following the instrouctions from the website and searched but > the error does no go away... > Otherwise I have not asked here... Paul lik

[SM-USERS] help needed

2010-02-14 Thread Piyush Joshi
Dear All, I am getting the following error with two plugins named - 1. change_qldforward ( ldap forwarding ) 2. serversidefilter ( serversidefilter-1.42.tar.gz ) I googled lot to find the solution but no help so far Error - Fatal error: Call to undefined function sqgetGlobal

Re: [SM-USERS] "You must be logged in" with Firefox/1.4.20-RC2

2010-02-14 Thread Paul Lesniewski
Don't top post. Read the mailing list posting guidelines, please. > >> For ANY FIREFOX users loged into while the upgrade was made. > >> after kliking on "Logout" and re-login, all was working fine. > > > > I now see that it affects all three browsers, but at different times. > > It seems to be e

Re: [SM-USERS] "You must be logged in" with Firefox/1.4.20-RC2

2010-02-14 Thread Paul Lesniewski
>> For ANY FIREFOX users loged into while the upgrade was made. >> after kliking on "Logout" and re-login, all was working fine. > > I now see that it affects all three browsers, but at different times. > It seems to be either cache, cookie, sessions, or some other > persistent data that remains be

Re: [SM-USERS] Free access to sendmail thru SM

2010-02-14 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > I have a situation where a user has a predictable user/pass > combination, and a spammer has found it. It appears they have scripted > a way to login as that user, then send mail unrestricted, with a From > address outside of our domain, and t

Re: [SM-USERS] "change_passwd" or "compatibility" pluging produce error in "Options"

2010-02-14 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello, > > Am 2010-02-14 09:36:12, schrieb Paul Lesniewski: >> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Michelle Konzack >> wrote: >> > Hello *, >> > >> > my users have Unix account on the servers and Now I have  installed  the >> > "compatibilit

Re: [SM-USERS] "change_passwd" or "compatibility" pluging produce error in "Options"

2010-02-14 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, Am 2010-02-14 09:36:12, schrieb Paul Lesniewski: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Michelle Konzack > wrote: > > Hello *, > > > > my users have Unix account on the servers and Now I have  installed  the > > "compatibility" pluging together with "change_passwd" but if I now klick > > on "O

Re: [SM-USERS] Thanks guys -- spam from my mail server

2010-02-14 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, Am 2010-02-14 10:29:06, schrieb Marc Powell: > On Feb 14, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > Sorry Marc, but such messages are already catched by spamassassin... > This wasn't directed at you unless you're Benedict simon by another > name. If you are, why are you posting under di

Re: [SM-USERS] Free access to sendmail thru SM

2010-02-14 Thread Marc Powell
On Feb 14, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Alex wrote: > Is it possible to instead configure squirrelmail/sendmail to go > through the standard authentication process, instead of calling > sendmail directly? conf.pl -> Server Settings. -- Marc ---

[SM-USERS] Free access to sendmail thru SM

2010-02-14 Thread Alex
Hi, I have a situation where a user has a predictable user/pass combination, and a spammer has found it. It appears they have scripted a way to login as that user, then send mail unrestricted, with a From address outside of our domain, and to any external recipient. It seems that once they are au

Re: [SM-USERS] "You must be logged in" with Firefox/1.4.20-RC2

2010-02-14 Thread Zack Odell
I have seen this starting 2.13.2010. It first started with IE7 and I thought it was an IE issue because I installed Firefox and all problems went away. I have started to hear troubles from customers using FF, IE, and Chrome. However, it seems as though if the customer has IE and doesn't have

Re: [SM-USERS] "You must be logged in" with Firefox/1.4.20-RC2

2010-02-14 Thread Alex
Hi, > For ANY FIREFOX users loged into while the upgrade was made. > after kliking on "Logout" and re-login, all was working fine. I now see that it affects all three browsers, but at different times. It seems to be either cache, cookie, sessions, or some other persistent data that remains beyond

Re: [SM-USERS] "change_passwd" or "compatibility" pluging produce error in "Options"

2010-02-14 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello *, > > my users have Unix account on the servers and Now I have  installed  the > "compatibility" pluging together with "change_passwd" but if I now klick > on "Options" I get: > > 8<--

Re: [SM-USERS] Thanks guys -- spam from my mail server

2010-02-14 Thread Marc Powell
On Feb 14, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Marc and *, > > Am 2010-02-13 09:33:38, schrieb Marc Powell: >> Why do you think Mailscanner protects you from the following -- > > > > Sorry Marc, but such messages are already catched by spamassassin... This wasn't directed at yo

[SM-USERS] "change_passwd" or "compatibility" pluging produce error in "Options"

2010-02-14 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello *, my users have Unix account on the servers and Now I have installed the "compatibility" pluging together with "change_passwd" but if I now klick on "Options" I get: 8<--

Re: [SM-USERS] "You must be logged in" with Firefox/1.4.20-RC2

2010-02-14 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Alex, I had this error to and it happen, if a user was loged into, then you upgraded, and the user refresh a frame or select a folder... This happen from 1.4.14 to 1.4.20-RC2 For ANY FIREFOX users loged into while the upgrade was made. after kliking on "Logout" and re-login, all was wor

Re: [SM-USERS] Thanks guys -- spam from my mail server

2010-02-14 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Marc and *, Am 2010-02-13 09:33:38, schrieb Marc Powell: > Why do you think Mailscanner protects you from the following -- Sorry Marc, but such messages are already catched by spamassassin... > The answer is that Mailscanner does *nothing* to protect against this > form of phishing (spea

Re: [SM-USERS] spam from my mail server

2010-02-14 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, Am 2010-02-13 09:23:07, schrieb Chris Hilts: > More importantly, tell them that you'll never need to ask them for their > password. Anyone asking for their password is a thief and a liar. > > That's what I tell them, anyway. This is a part of the Messages too... However, I have curently

Re: [SM-USERS] Thanks guys -- spam from my mail server

2010-02-14 Thread Benedict simon
> > On Feb 13, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Benedict simon wrote: > >> I dont rule out the possiblity of a phishing attack but since im do >> running MailScanner I was not really hoping about this > > Why do you think Mailscanner protects you from the following -- > > "Dear kmun.gov.kw user, > > This is your