Re: [SM-USERS] Stupid users and 10K INBOX

2009-11-16 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
LuKreme wrote: > > On 16-Nov-2009, at 03:01, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >> * LuKreme : >>> On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:50, Ralf Hildebrandt >>> wrote: >>> Hm, which IMAP server is that? >>> >>> Courier-imapd-ssl running on pretty old hardware. >> >> Yes, that's very slow, since it does no head

Re: [SM-USERS] Stupid users and 10K INBOX

2009-11-16 Thread LuKreme
On 16-Nov-2009, at 03:01, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * LuKreme : >> On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:50, Ralf Hildebrandt >> wrote: >> >>> Hm, which IMAP server is that? >> >> Courier-imapd-ssl running on pretty old hardware. > > Yes, that's very slow, since it does no header caching (unlike dovecot) I

Re: [SM-USERS] Stupid users and 10K INBOX

2009-11-16 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* LuKreme : > > > On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:50, Ralf Hildebrandt > wrote: > > > Hm, which IMAP server is that? > > Courier-imapd-ssl running on pretty old hardware. Yes, that's very slow, since it does no header caching (unlike dovecot) -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Net

Re: [SM-USERS] Stupid users and 10K INBOX

2009-11-16 Thread LuKreme
On Nov 12, 2009, at 2:02, "Tomas Kuliavas" wrote: > Make sure that mailbox is not sorted. In most of the cases unsorted > list > is arranged by internal date and looks sorted. Sort setting is > stored in > user preferences. See 'sort' value. Older SquirrelMail versions > defaulted > to

Re: [SM-USERS] Stupid users and 10K INBOX

2009-11-16 Thread LuKreme
On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:50, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > Hm, which IMAP server is that? Courier-imapd-ssl running on pretty old hardware. -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day tr