Re: [SM-USERS] POP3 mail server- leave messages on the server

2009-07-24 Thread Paul Lesniewski
"Why would you want to? This is a good thing. Think of it as new==unread, cur==read." "I can't imagine why you'd want to do this anyway. Can you explain?" In a company where an email account like i...@x.com exists it must been seen from many employees due

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail and LDAP

2009-07-24 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
acidd22 wrote: > > I run squirrelmail on my web host's site. I would to get an LDAP server > working with Squirrelmail so i ran the config program and added an LDAP > server in the Address book menu. I added the configuration settings i was > given, but no addresses showed up in my address bo

Re: [SM-USERS] POP3 mail server- leave messages on the server

2009-07-24 Thread info
> On 7/9/09, Roland Fritz wrote: >> >> John79 schrieb: >>> >>> "Why would you want to? This is a good thing. Think of it as >>> new==unread, >>> cur==read." >>> "I can't imagine why you'd want to do this anyway. Can you explain?" >>> >>> In a company where an email account like i...@x.com exi

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail and LDAP

2009-07-24 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 7/8/09, acidd22 wrote: > > I run squirrelmail on my web host's site. I would to get an LDAP server > working with Squirrelmail so i ran the config program and added an LDAP > server in the Address book menu. I added the configuration settings i was > given, but no addresses showed up in my ad

Re: [SM-USERS] POP3 mail server- leave messages on the server

2009-07-24 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 7/9/09, Roland Fritz wrote: > > John79 schrieb: >> >> "Why would you want to? This is a good thing. Think of it as new==unread, >> cur==read." >> "I can't imagine why you'd want to do this anyway. Can you explain?" >> >> In a company where an email account like i...@x.com exists it must >>