Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-12 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:03:56 -0400, Piet Slaghekke wrote: > >Jonathan Angliss wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:27 -0400, Piet Slaghekke >> wrote: >> >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your >>> solutions could be shared with m

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-12 Thread Oguzhan Kayhan
Using an IMAP Proxy might fix some issues on serverside. Specially on large installations with lots of users with large inboxes, it helps on decreasing disk access everytime u refresh ur inbox.. I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your solutions could be

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-12 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
>>> I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of >>> your solutions could be shared with me. >>> >>> I am using SM version: 1.4.10a >> >> Upgrade, 1.4.10 is 2 years old, and has several known security issues. > > Yes agreed. > >>> If a user as an inbox of more than 2000 mess

Re: [SM-USERS] Remove Attachment Download Option

2009-06-12 Thread dwnek
>We are using Squirrelmail 1.4.17 (and trying to figure out login problems >using 1.4.19) with Qmail/Vpopmail/Courier IMAP/Apache 2.2.11/PHP 5.2.9. >We are using this for a department within our organization where users and >their computers are very locked down. > >I have installed the Attachment D

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-12 Thread Piet Slaghekke
Wm Mussatto wrote: On Thu, June 11, 2009 14:05, Piet Slaghekke wrote: Thanks everyone for your responses.I do not have any filtering configured. Also I have followed all the optimizations in the documentation.When I have a users with a new mailbox everything loads very fast, it seems

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-12 Thread Piet Slaghekke
Jonathan Angliss wrote: On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:27 -0400, Piet Slaghekke wrote: Hello everyone, I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your solutions could be shared with me. I am using SM version: 1.4.10a Upgrade, 1.4.10 is 2 years old, and has se

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: squirrel mail sucks]

2009-06-12 Thread jenny
Thanks, Roland. Understand. Everyone has been quite helpful. I apologize for the unkind comments under frustration. I do lack full understanding of what Squirrel Mail does. I need to start attacking our administrator. (hehe j/k) Appreciate the pointer. Regards. > Dear Jenny, > > je...@u-impression

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: squirrel mail sucks]

2009-06-12 Thread jenny
Thanks, Marc! Jawed and I worked things out regarding the comment. You're right. From the email responses, SquirrelMail seems like a pretty tight program with talented group of people behind it... just my version is VERY limited & restricted. It's very frustrating! ROAR!!! Anyway, I'll try to follo

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-12 Thread Nieuwslezer
You wrote: > > On Thu, June 11, 2009 5:13 am, Nieuwslezer wrote: > > You wrote: > > > >> > > > On Wed, June 10, 2009 1:28 pm, Jukka Salmi wrote: > > > > Hello, > >> > > > > > je...@u-impression.com --> SquirrelMail-users (2009-06-09 15:40:25 > > > > +0800): > > > > > I must say that this email re