Re: [SM-USERS] Remove Attachment Download Option

2009-06-11 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:07:29 -0400, dw...@dollartree.com wrote: > >We are using Squirrelmail 1.4.17 (and trying to figure out login problems >using 1.4.19) with Qmail/Vpopmail/Courier IMAP/Apache 2.2.11/PHP 5.2.9. >We are using this for a department within our organization where users and >their c

Re: [SM-USERS] Still problems with 1.4.19 and "you must be logged in" error

2009-06-11 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:30:12 +0200, Rafael Martinez wrote: >dw...@dollartree.com wrote: >[] >> >> When I simply reconfigure httpd.conf to point to webmail-1.4.17 vice >> webmail-1.4.19 and restart the httpd service all of the above problems go >> away. >> >> I have not seen a response back

Re: [SM-USERS] Problem with Filters

2009-06-11 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:33:58 -0400, "Randal T. Rioux" wrote: >System Details: > >- SquirrelMail v1.4.19 >- No extra plugins >- Apache/2.2.11 (Unix) PHP/5.2.9 mod_ssl/2.2.11 OpenSSL/0.9.7d DAV/2 >- Whatever 1&1 uses for IMAP and SMTP >- SunOS ariel 5.10 Generic_139555-08 sun4u >- SM from source >-

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:27 -0400, Piet Slaghekke wrote: >Hello everyone, > >I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your >solutions could be shared with me. > >I am using SM version: 1.4.10a Upgrade, 1.4.10 is 2 years old, and has several known security issues. >I

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Wm Mussatto
On Thu, June 11, 2009 14:05, Piet Slaghekke wrote: > Thanks everyone for your responses.I do not have any filtering > configured. > > Also I have followed all the optimizations in the documentation.When > I have a users with a new mailbox everything loads very fast, it seems > to only occur

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-11 Thread Chris Hilts
Juan Hernandez wrote: > ehh are we going to keep this threat alive by answering to all this > pointless BS? No, of course not. Oops. -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified l

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Piet Slaghekke
Thanks everyone for your responses.I do not have any filtering configured. Also I have followed all the optimizations in the documentation.When I have a users with a new mailbox everything loads very fast, it seems to only occur with users who have many folders and large inboxes.<-

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Karl Pearson
On Thu, June 11, 2009 2:19 pm, Randal T. Rioux wrote: > On Thu, June 11, 2009 3:51 pm, i...@braha.nl wrote: >>> Thanks William, >>> >>> Ok here are some more details: >>> >>> Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is >>> set to True. >>> >> I run the same software on a

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-11 Thread Juan Hernandez
ehh are we going to keep this threat alive by answering to all this pointless BS? On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Karl Pearson wrote: > > On Thu, June 11, 2009 5:13 am, Nieuwslezer wrote: > > You wrote: > > > >> > >> On Wed, June 10, 2009 1:28 pm, Jukka Salmi wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> >

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Randal T. Rioux
On Thu, June 11, 2009 3:51 pm, i...@braha.nl wrote: >> Thanks William, >> >> Ok here are some more details: >> >> Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is >> set to True. >> > I run the same software on a 7 year old P4 machine, and have boxes of > 8000+ mails. Never had

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread info
> Thanks William, > > Ok here are some more details: > > Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is > set to True. > I run the same software on a 7 year old P4 machine, and have boxes of 8000+ mails. Never had this trouble. Maybe you read up on optimizing the speed, ther

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Piet Slaghekke
Thanks William, Ok here are some more details: Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is set to True. hope that helps. Wm Mussatto wrote: On Thu, June 11, 2009 08:47, Piet Slaghekke wrote: Hello everyone, I am sure more people have had issues with this a

Re: [SM-USERS] Need to route email traffic through multiple ethernet ports

2009-06-11 Thread Karl Pearson
On Wed, June 10, 2009 3:11 pm, ExpatSean wrote: > > Hey guys, > > Please bear with me, and feel free to ask for clarification if I'm not > specific enough in certain spots. I was hired as a Windows Server guy, > and > got thrown into installing, configuring and maintaining a Mac server > we're >

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-11 Thread Karl Pearson
On Thu, June 11, 2009 5:13 am, Nieuwslezer wrote: > You wrote: > >> >> On Wed, June 10, 2009 1:28 pm, Jukka Salmi wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > je...@u-impression.com --> SquirrelMail-users (2009-06-09 15:40:25 >> > +0800): >> > > I must say that this email really sucks. >> > >> > indeed, your emai

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Wm Mussatto
On Thu, June 11, 2009 08:47, Piet Slaghekke wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your > solutions could be shared with me. > > I am using SM version: 1.4.10a > > If a user as an inbox of more than 2000 messages it may take SM 1 + > minutes

[SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Piet Slaghekke
Hello everyone, I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your solutions could be shared with me. I am using SM version: 1.4.10a If a user as an inbox of more than 2000 messages it may take SM 1 + minutes to load. Sometimes it will give the folloing error message:

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: squirrel mail sucks]

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Kamen
Fredrik Jervfors wrote: >>> you are an idiot Jenny ! ! >> You are also an IDIOT! >> Great show of service, Jawed! >> Didn't u know customers are always right? >> >> Squirrel Mail sucks even MORE now because of you. > > This is a public mailing list and every opinion here is made by an > individual

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: squirrel mail sucks]

2009-06-11 Thread Garry Taylor
Free software that's part of the terms of the GPL and is stated as "Not fit for purpose". Therefore I can't believe it can guarantee emails like yours. If you use open source software then this is the risk. If you implement it you much be able to fix and problems yourself. It you do not know ho

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: squirrel mail sucks]

2009-06-11 Thread Garry Taylor
Garry Taylor wrote: > > > je...@u-impression.com wrote: >> You are also an IDIOT! >> Great show of service, Jawed! >> Didn't u know customers are always right? >> >> Squirrel Mail sucks even MORE now because of you. >> >> The administrator explanation I can understand. I don't have a strong >> admi

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: squirrel mail sucks]

2009-06-11 Thread Marc Powell
On Jun 11, 2009, at 2:57 AM, je...@u-impression.com wrote: > You are also an IDIOT! The more you speak without knowing what you're talking about, the more this statement reflects on you. > Great show of service, Jawed! You expected him, or anyone on this list, to provide service? > Didn't u

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-11 Thread Marc Powell
On Jun 11, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Nieuwslezer wrote: > You wrote: > >> >> On Wed, June 10, 2009 1:28 pm, Jukka Salmi wrote: >> I LOVE SQUIRRELMAIL I have a product that's free, that I can >> share >> with my users, also for FREE, and customize to behave like just >> about any >> email client

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: squirrel mail sucks]

2009-06-11 Thread Roland Fritz
Dear Jenny, je...@u-impression.com schrieb: > You are also an IDIOT! > Great show of service, Jawed! > Didn't u know customers are always right? > > Squirrel Mail sucks even MORE now because of you. > > The administrator explanation I can understand. I don't have a strong > administrator that can

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: squirrel mail sucks]

2009-06-11 Thread Chris Hilts
je...@u-impression.com wrote: > You are also an IDIOT! > Great show of service, Jawed! > Didn't u know customers are always right? You're demanding free help and tossing insults. You're not a customer. Start paying, then maybe you can be "always right." > Thanks a lot! You've got GRRREAT class~

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: squirrel mail sucks]

2009-06-11 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
>> you are an idiot Jenny ! ! > > You are also an IDIOT! > Great show of service, Jawed! > Didn't u know customers are always right? > > Squirrel Mail sucks even MORE now because of you. This is a public mailing list and every opinion here is made by an individual writer and not necessarily by the

[SM-USERS] Remove Attachment Download Option

2009-06-11 Thread dwnek
We are using Squirrelmail 1.4.17 (and trying to figure out login problems using 1.4.19) with Qmail/Vpopmail/Courier IMAP/Apache 2.2.11/PHP 5.2.9. We are using this for a department within our organization where users and their computers are very locked down. I have installed the Attachment Docume

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-11 Thread Nieuwslezer
You wrote: > > On Wed, June 10, 2009 1:28 pm, Jukka Salmi wrote: > > Hello, > > > > je...@u-impression.com --> SquirrelMail-users (2009-06-09 15:40:25 > > +0800): > > > I must say that this email really sucks. > > > > indeed, your email sucks. But why did you write it then? > > Yes! Someone who

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: squirrel mail sucks]

2009-06-11 Thread jenny
You are also an IDIOT! Great show of service, Jawed! Didn't u know customers are always right? Squirrel Mail sucks even MORE now because of you. The administrator explanation I can understand. I don't have a strong administrator that can help with my email interface problems - that's it. But your

[SM-USERS] Need to route email traffic through multiple ethernet ports

2009-06-11 Thread ExpatSean
Hey guys, Please bear with me, and feel free to ask for clarification if I'm not specific enough in certain spots. I was hired as a Windows Server guy, and got thrown into installing, configuring and maintaining a Mac server we're going to be switching our company email over to. :( Below I've c