> I have for several years been running Squirrelmail 1.4.3a on an RAQ550
> with PHP 4.0.6, no problems whatsoever during either operation or
> original installation.
Except all the known security holes. ;-)
> This server is now showing faulty-disk symptoms, so I am moving
> everything to an iden
>> The problem is that SM can't magically know what address to use. It
>> can't just pick the TO header and use that address, because that's
>> often not even your address at all. It thus uses the current login
>> username, since that's usually the best bet. Your situation is not
>> the norm. S
Tovis, STOP TOP POSTING. I already asked you to read the mailing list
posting guidelines, but you ignored me. Please DO NOT post again
until you have learned how to interact on this list.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:15 AM, tovis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Dennis
> You right, of course the sm
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Jeremy Mann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a question regarding the check_quota plugin. I don't care how large
> the users mail folders get, rather I want to put a quota on the size of
> their mail spool file. Will this check_quota plugin perform that function
Jeremy Mann wrote:
> I have a question regarding the check_quota plugin. I don't care how large
> the users mail folders get, rather I want to put a quota on the size of
> their mail spool file. Will this check_quota plugin perform that function?
> If not, what would you recommend?
>
>
Quotas ar
I have a question regarding the check_quota plugin. I don't care how large
the users mail folders get, rather I want to put a quota on the size of
their mail spool file. Will this check_quota plugin perform that function?
If not, what would you recommend?
--
Jeremy Mann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Univer
Hi, Dennis
You right, the host also could be suspiciouse - UPC Hungary - they
frequently changes configurations, without annoncement :(
Also sm (1.4.9a) for Debian stable does not changed for very long time!
Unfortunatelly I do not realized what time exactly the functionality is
broken :(
Most susp
> Hi, Dennis
> You right, the host also could be suspiciouse - UPC Hungary - they
> frequently changes configurations, without annoncement :(
> Also sm (1.4.9a) for Debian stable does not changed for very long time!
> Unfortunatelly I do not realized what time exactly the functionality is
> broken
Hi, Dennis
You right, of course the sm is a great product, I'm use it for many years.
I'm using default for Debian/Etch mta exim4 - with "smart host" - I do not
have MX record at all. Method, send a manually initiated answer (where you
can choose the return address), only a workaround - may be does
