[SM-USERS] Search Error

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
SM 1.5.2. running a basic search ERROR ERROR: Unknown IMAP response. Query: SEARCH CHARSET "ISO-8859-1" ALL FROM "test" Reason Given: no character sets supported How can I resolve this? -- Scott - This SF.Net email is spons

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 1, 2008, at 9:58 PM, Karl Pearson wrote: >> And the EIMS developer showed surprising ignorance regarding this >> fact. That's the biggest sign to me that you need to find a better >> IMAP server. > > Might I suggest switching to Dovecot. I don't know if it's possible, > but > when I made

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 1, 2008, at 7:45 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> Not off the top of my head. It's been a long time since I've delved >> into it, my Real Life has really slammed my development time. > > If you insist on keeping enormous INBOXes (bad form IMO), try > SquirrelMail 1.5.2, where header fetching

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: Previous user's folders and email visible]

2008-10-01 Thread Wayne Bow
Aloha, Just wanted to follow up with this. I decided to side step the issue. I installed apache2, php5 and squirrelmail on the actual mail server and will redirect my users via the link they use to get to webmail. On this installation the browsers I've tested work properly and there is no is

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Karl Pearson
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Chris Hilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Scott Haneda wrote: 3 seconds just to tell you how many messages there are. Now imagine how long it takes to fetch headers. >>> >>> I know, I feel it is slow as well. >

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Chris Hilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott Haneda wrote: >>> 3 seconds just to tell you how many messages there are. Now imagine how >>> long it takes to fetch headers. >> >> I know, I feel it is slow as well. Your response doesn't indicate you understood what

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Chris Hilts
Scott Haneda wrote: >> 3 seconds just to tell you how many messages there are. Now imagine how >> long it takes to fetch headers. > > I know, I feel it is slow as well. To better help me get this into > perspective, what hardware examples can you give me as for cpu and > drives, and how many mes

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 1, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Chris Hilts wrote: > Scott Haneda wrote: >> Hello, I am running SquirrelMail 1.4.16, against EIMS Mail Server >> which support IMAP. >> >> SquirrelMail is very slow at loading mailboxes. EIMS stores mail >> in a >> single file, like UW IMAP server. If I telnet into t

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 1, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Chris Hilts wrote: > Scott Haneda wrote: >> Hello, I am running SquirrelMail 1.4.16, against EIMS Mail Server >> which support IMAP. >> >> SquirrelMail is very slow at loading mailboxes. EIMS stores mail >> in a >> single file, like UW IMAP server. If I telnet into t

[SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
Hello, I am running SquirrelMail 1.4.16, against EIMS Mail Server which support IMAP. SquirrelMail is very slow at loading mailboxes. EIMS stores mail in a single file, like UW IMAP server. If I telnet into the server, and select a mailbox, one in which I feel it is not that large, perhaps