Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail exploits?

2008-07-03 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Michel wrote: > >> >>> how the hell is the MTA to know what is genuine Email and what is not, >> >> that's the point, it does not and does not need to as well as SM does not >> need to >> check if a correct user/p

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail used for spam

2008-07-03 Thread Paul A
Thanks for all the suggestions. Paul. P.A > -Original Message- P.A > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P.A > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of P.A > John Fawcett P.A > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 1:57 AM P.A > To: Squirrelmail User Support Mailing List P.A > Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelm

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail used for spam

2008-07-03 Thread Marc Powell
On Jul 3, 2008, at 7:25 AM, Nabin Limbu wrote: > - All exploited accounts preference were changed (Name, email, reply > address) > - All exploited accounts were forced to use signature and multiple > signatures were full of spam messages with filename in this pattern > username.si1 username.si2

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail used for spam

2008-07-03 Thread Nabin Limbu
I had the same issue of spamming via my squirrelmail few days ago. Suddenly, I found large queued mails on my mail server authenticated via squirrelmail. Below are things that I found after a short analysis - All exploited accounts had same username and password. I don't how did they find all the