Re: [SM-USERS] Guidelines (was: "message not sent" when there is no FQDN) (was: "message not sent" when there is no FQDN)

On 19 Dec 2007 20:57:00 +0100, Helmut Hullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo, Paul, > > Du (paul) meintest am 19.12.07: > > >> Who tells "sendmail" the unbalanced address? > >> > >> mail -s ping root > >> > >> does work, it doesn't need a complete address. > > >>> C) Incomplete inquiries

Re: [SM-USERS] ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server

Paul, The patch worked. I did a clean install of SM 1.4.13 and tested it again to make sure it would not work. Then I applied the patch and tried sending a "reply" and it worked. Great job on finding and fixing the issue. Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > On Dec 14, 2007 11:32 PM, Jerry Reininger

[SM-USERS] Guidelines (was: "message not sent" when there is no FQDN) (was: "message not sent" when there is no FQDN)

Hallo, Paul, Du (paul) meintest am 19.12.07: >> Who tells "sendmail" the unbalanced address? >> >> mail -s ping root >> >> does work, it doesn't need a complete address. >>> C) Incomplete inquiries get incomplete answers. >> >> If I knew the answer I wouldn't ask. > But you still didn't

Re: [SM-USERS] Unable to open messages in Inbox.

Frank DeChellis wrote: > > > > > On 12/18/07 1:43 PM, "Tomas Kuliavas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > Frank DeChellis wrote: >> >>> >>> A search doesn¹t bring up anything >> conclusive >>> for me...so here I am. >>> >>> I have 1.4.13nb1 installed on >> NetBSD. We use PHP >>> 4.4.6

Re: [SM-USERS] "message not sent" when there is no FQDN

On 19 Dec 2007 18:46:00 +0100, Helmut Hullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo, Paul, > > Du (paul) meintest am 19.12.07: > > Is this behaviour an error of squirrelmail or my error? > >> > >>> I do this all the time and it works fine for me > >> > >> Fine to read. > >> But I find this men

Re: [SM-USERS] "message not sent" when there is no FQDN

Hallo, Paul, Du (paul) meintest am 19.12.07: Is this behaviour an error of squirrelmail or my error? >> >>> I do this all the time and it works fine for me >> >> Fine to read. >> But I find this mentioned behaviour on (at least) 3 installations of >> squirrelmail: 1.4.9a, 1.4.13, 1.5.1 -

Re: [SM-USERS] "message not sent" when there is no FQDN

On 19 Dec 2007 17:00:00 +0100, Helmut Hullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo, Paul, > > Du (paul) meintest am 19.12.07: > > >> when I try to send e-mail to a local user (p.e. root) who has no > >> entry in my adress book and I write only "root" into the "To:" field > >> squirrelmail refuses work

Re: [SM-USERS] "message not sent" when there is no FQDN

Hallo, Paul, Du (paul) meintest am 19.12.07: >> when I try to send e-mail to a local user (p.e. root) who has no >> entry in my adress book and I write only "root" into the "To:" field >> squirrelmail refuses work with >> >> FEHLER >> Message not sent. >> Geforderte Aktion nicht ausgeführt: Post

Re: [SM-USERS] Error when replyring: Connection dropped

Am Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2007 06:13 schrieb Paul Lesniewski: > > Attempt two, with more serious refactoring is attached to this > > message. Please test and let us know how it goes. > Slight correction in the attached patch. This one did the trick. Writing, replying, forwarding, with or withou

Re: [SM-USERS] "message not sent" when there is no FQDN

On 19 Dec 2007 14:46:00 +0100, Helmut Hullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo, squirrelmail-users, > > when I try to send e-mail to a local user (p.e. root) who has no entry > in my adress book and I write only "root" into the "To:" field > squirrelmail refuses work with > > FEHLER > Message not

[SM-USERS] "message not sent" when there is no FQDN

Hallo, squirrelmail-users, when I try to send e-mail to a local user (p.e. root) who has no entry in my adress book and I write only "root" into the "To:" field squirrelmail refuses work with FEHLER Message not sent. Geforderte Aktion nicht ausgeführt: Postfachname nicht zulässig Server antw

Re: [SM-USERS] Unsubscribe link

On Dec 19, 2007 12:47 AM, Nigel Adamthwaite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I have been looking for the link to un subscribe from this email > forum and can not find it. Can someone email it to me please. All you have to do is read the *entire* message - any message on this list, as there is a

Re: [SM-USERS] Unsubscribe link

Sorry, I have been looking for the link to un subscribe from this email forum and can not find it. Can someone email it to me please. Thanks Regards Nigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Lesniewski Sent: 19 Dec

Re: [SM-USERS] Error when replyring: Connection dropped [SOLVED]

> >> > > First, let's make sure there isn't any funky PHP issues with the > >> > > global IMAP connection - try the attached patch if you don't mind. > >> I > >> > > hope it WON'T help, but want to make sure. > >> > > >> > I tested it - it DOESN'T help. > >> > >> Attempt two, with more serious refa

Re: [SM-USERS] ANNOUNCE: SquirrelMail 1.4.13 Released

Fredrik Jervfors schrieb: > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]": >> "Jon Angliss": >>> Due to the package compromise of 1.4.11, and 1.4.12, we are forced to >>> release 1.4.13 to ensure no confusions. >> >> When and in which way was 1.4.11 compromised? This came to me as a >> surprise since all the other posts on

Re: [SM-USERS] Error when replyring: Connection dropped [SOLVED]

Paul Lesniewski schrieb: > On Dec 18, 2007 6:31 PM, Paul Lesniewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Dec 18, 2007 11:25 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007 14:33 schrieb Paul Lesniewski: >> > >> > > First, let's make sure there isn't any funky PHP issues with the >>