Re: [SM-USERS] plug-in not working

2007-10-16 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 10/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am running the latest SM from the site Please provide more accurate information. See the mailing list posting guidelines BEFORE you post if you are unsure what to provide. >. I have the compatibility plug-in > installed but when I

[SM-USERS] plug-in not working

2007-10-16 Thread Sales
I am running the latest SM from the site. I have the compatibility plug-in installed but when I enable change password plug-in (The latest from the site) the options menu never displays. When I disable the change password plug-in the option menu displays. Any ideas? John -

Re: [SM-USERS] Unusual Problem

2007-10-16 Thread Scott Moseman
On 10/16/07, Paul Lesniewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It does not directly address your issue, but the best thing you can > do (for other reasons as well) is move to maildir format for your mail > stores (sounds like you are using mailbox files). > Yeah, that's in the cards, I'm just pushing

Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-16 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
"Steve Moyes" wrote: > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:44 -0700, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> Please do NOT top post, thank you. > > Sorry.. wasn't watching what I was doing. > > Hi thanx for the reply. It's not the shell access I'm bothered > about.. allow me to explain further. What I was thinking

Re: [SM-USERS] Unusual Problem

2007-10-16 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 10/16/07, Scott Moseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/17/07, Scott Moseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/14/07, Scott Moseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 9/14/07, Wm Mussatto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have one user who occasionally has a unique problem. Sh

Re: [SM-USERS] Unusual Problem

2007-10-16 Thread Scott Moseman
On 9/17/07, Scott Moseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/14/07, Scott Moseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/14/07, Wm Mussatto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I have one user who occasionally has a unique problem. She will > > > > continue receiving email, but she's unable to mov

Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-16 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 10/16/07, Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On October 16, 2007 06:35 am Steve Moyes wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:44 -0700, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > Separate from exactly what? Not meaning to offend, but my guess is > > > that you may not understand the concept of how SM auth

Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-16 Thread Freddie Cash
On October 16, 2007 06:35 am Steve Moyes wrote: > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:44 -0700, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > Separate from exactly what? Not meaning to offend, but my guess is > > that you may not understand the concept of how SM authenticates > > and/or what a "mail account" is. SM can care l

Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-16 Thread David Ford
Steve Moyes wrote: > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:44 -0700, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > >> Please do NOT top post, thank you. >> >> > Sorry.. wasn't watching what I was doing. > > > Hi thanx for the reply. It's not the shell access I'm bothered about.. > allow me to explain further. >>

Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-16 Thread Steve Moyes
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:44 -0700, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Please do NOT top post, thank you. > Sorry.. wasn't watching what I was doing. > > > > Hi thanx for the reply. It's not the shell access I'm bothered about.. > > > > allow me to explain further. > > > > What I was thinking is, the front