>> If is an exploit to squirrelmail maybe a simple renaming mailto.php
>> mailtonew.php (and edit al references to mailto.php) can solve temporary
>> this
>> issue.
>
> What is this mailto.php vulnerability of which I've heard so much in
> this thread? Sounds like something rather nasty.
I gave
I subscribe to the squirrelmail-users mailing list.
[ ] True - No need to CC me when replying
[X] False - Please CC me when replying
This bug occurs when I ...
... view a particular message
... use a specific plugin/function
.x.. try to do/view/use
The description of the bug:
C
Hi there,
after upgrading my server from Debian Sarge to Debian Etch I have a problem
with the newmail plugin.
I don't get any notifications when a new mail arrives. I use Mozilla Firefox,
Javascript is turned
on.
My options are these:
Change title on supported browsers: Checked (does not work!
On 9/10/07, Martin Moriarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there
> I recently upgraded to squirrelmail 1.4.9a, now running on php 5.2.4 ,
> on apache 2.0.59 on Suse Enterprise Server 9. Up to the upgrade I was
> able to view all messages for all users irregardless of size of spool
> file. Ive a f
On 9/7/07, adriayna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've searched the forums, read through the development docs, and haven't
> found an answer to this question.
>
> We are running Squirrelmail version 1.4.8-4.0.1.el4 on an RHL Enterprise
> edition 4 apache webserver. We've been
On 9/6/07, zinob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I subscribe to the squirrelmail-users mailing list.
> [ ] True - No need to CC me when replying
> [X] False - Please CC me when replying
>
> This bug occurs when I ...
> Try to open the second page of my huge spamfolder.
>
>
> The description of the
Hi there
I recently upgraded to squirrelmail 1.4.9a, now running on php 5.2.4 ,
on apache 2.0.59 on Suse Enterprise Server 9. Up to the upgrade I was
able to view all messages for all users irregardless of size of spool
file. Ive a few awkward managers with mailboxes larger than 100meg.
Since
By popular request, I've changed this mailing list to munge the "Reply-To"
header to point to this list. The pro is that it's now easier to reply to
the list, but the con is that it's harder to reply to a poster if one
would want to.
Sincerely,
Fredrik
More about "Reply-To" header munging:
http:/
