On 7/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear ALL,
>
> I have been using the archive pluggin ver 1.2 by jimmy corner and it works
> beautifully.
>
> i am the administrator here . right now i use dumb to backup all mails on
> my remote tape.
> i have also instructed users to archi
Dear ALL,
I have been using the archive pluggin ver 1.2 by jimmy corner and it works
beautifully.
i am the administrator here . right now i use dumb to backup all mails on
my remote tape.
i have also instructed users to archive their own mails
but i like to know is a some way or a pluggin where
On 7/1/07, Res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
>
> OOOT folks :)
>
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>
> > very happy with Postfix, especially compared to Sendmail (you're
> > kidding!)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
OOOT folks :)
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> very happy with Postfix, especially compared to Sendmail (you're
> kidding!).
We are each different, that's exactly what gives us these
On 7/1/07, Res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>
> >> haha I'm the first to admit it used to have a LOT of serious issues
> >> but in more recent year
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>> haha I'm the first to admit it used to have a LOT of serious issues
>> but in more recent years it hasn't been too bad given its pretty
>> powerfull a
