> I am sorry about my earlier email...
>
> i did made a mistake in vi editing
>
> anyway..
> if i now edit the file in vi it works fine.. and i can add new address to
> my Global address book
>
> but now i would like to know if there is a pluggin or anyway other easier
> way for the mail admin pers
Dear All,
I want to use the global address book feature to make all existing users,
the emails address of new users.
i create the global address book global_book in vi and everything works
perfect but i like to know
but i cannot add anny address to my global address book through SQ mail ..
can
>> UW-IMAP is stable, tried and proven as well, the ONLY problem you'll
>> have is what we have complained about for over 10 plus years, its
>> pathetic slow speed.
>
> Guess you're one of the lucky ones that has never had to fix b0rked mbox
> files. Consider yourself extremely lucky. It's not a
You haven't showed your message headers, so I can't verify if attachment
name is correct.
You haven't showed your modifications, so I can't verify that you haven't
modified download functions.
I can't reproduce your issue on SquirrelMail 1.4.10 and Win2k3 IE7.
Could you also provide more informa
On 6/29/07, Res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>
> > The fact that Sendmail comes out on top makes it immediately suspect
>
> Not really, it has prov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> The fact that Sendmail comes out on top makes it immediately suspect
Not really, it has proven itself over time, after all it has been around
for 25
On 6/29/07, Res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>
> >>> Postfix can do anything qmail can do for virtual domain delivery/hosting.
> >>
> >> But not as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>>> Postfix can do anything qmail can do for virtual domain delivery/hosting.
>>
>> But not as simple or as efficiently, been there done that
>
> I'd say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
Freddie, I cant reply to your message because you've been nuked as spam..
Pine doesn't like it :)
> pts rule name description
> -- --
>
On 6/29/07, Res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Nothing wrong with sendmail, tried and proven, yes, it comes down to
> >> "personal choice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>>
>> Nothing wrong with sendmail, tried and proven, yes, it comes down to
>> "personal choices" but for that mater qmail and vpopmail is better for
>> m
Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> On 6/28/07, Daniel W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>>> On 6/28/07, Daniel Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear List,
Has anyone got a setup where you have a Pound front end reverse-proxy
listening for HTTPS traffic, and redirectin
On 6/29/07, Res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
> > Personal preferance maybe, but don't use sendmail. You'll find Postfix to
> > be a lot nicer to wo
On June 29, 2007 03:12 pm Res wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Freddie Cash wrote:
> UW-IMAP is stable, tried and proven as well, the ONLY problem you'll
> have is what we have complained about for over 10 plus years, its
> pathetic slow speed.
Guess you're one of the lucky ones that has never had to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Res wrote:
> possible like Slackware, you have very few updates to worry about, only
> the security issues, which is higher because of the mutilation the likes
damn, shouldn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Freddie Cash wrote:
> Personal preferance maybe, but don't use sendmail. You'll find Postfix to
> be a lot nicer to work with.
Nothing wrong with sendmail, tried and proven,
On June 28, 2007 10:08 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but jus wanted to make a few things clear ...
>
> the setup gonna be
> RED hat ES 4
> sendmail
Personal preferance maybe, but don't use sendmail. You'll find Postfix to
be a lot nicer to work with.
> dovecot or UWIMAP
Any IMAP server EXCEPT
> I have this configuration:
> Win2k Server Edition SP4 with all the default patches.
> Default IIS as web server
> SM 1.4 as Web Mail
> Macallan Mail Solution as mail server
> Macallan works fine with the POP3 client. No problem.
>
> I did config.pl. and set write permission for the data director
I am sorry about my earlier email...
i did made a mistake in vi editing
anyway..
if i now edit the file in vi it works fine.. and i can add new address to
my Global address book
but now i would like to know if there is a pluggin or anyway other easier
way for the mail admin person to do it throu
Hello All,
I have this configuration:
Win2k Server Edition SP4 with all the default patches.
Default IIS as web server
SM 1.4 as Web Mail
Macallan Mail Solution as mail server
Macallan works fine with the POP3 client. No problem.
I did config.pl. and set write permission for the data directory.
L
i follwed the steps required to setup a global address book in conf.pl
but when i click on addresses only option of Add to Personal address book
is there.. no global addresses option
then i did create a address and found username.abook file is created
I did copy this file as global_abook and now
21 matches
Mail list logo
