Re: [SM-USERS] sql and use in scripts

2007-04-21 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 4/21/07, Res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Question, is there any reason the primary identifier for address and > userprefs tables are named differently? > > Would be so much easier to have them called both user or both owner > rather than diffe

Re: [SM-USERS] Reading the log files to discover why emails are beingdelayed

2007-04-21 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 4/21/07, John Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This message shows up when a google search of 'Palaxar' is done. Is there > anyway to remove this message from the forum so that google can not post it? No. The nature of a public mailing list is that anyone can subscribe. Numerous 3rd party l

Re: [SM-USERS] Reading the log files to discover why emails are beingdelayed

2007-04-21 Thread John Glynn
This message shows up when a google search of 'Palaxar' is done. Is there anyway to remove this message from the forum so that google can not post it? Thanks, John Glynn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Glynn Sent: Thursday, October

[SM-USERS] sql and use in scripts

2007-04-21 Thread Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Question, is there any reason the primary identifier for address and userprefs tables are named differently? Would be so much easier to have them called both user or both owner rather than different one for each, makes life easier in scripts :) Is t