Re: [SM-USERS] problem with ssl

2005-11-23 Thread zamri
On Thu, November 24, 2005 2:38 am, Paul Lesneiwski said: > > > zamri wrote: >> yes. ur right. that is normal coz https is used just for transferring >> login information. after that the normal http is used for everything >> else. >> I notice gmail, yahoo and hotmail do the same. > > But the point i

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: problem with SSL

2005-11-23 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>>> I have finally got the secure login plugin to force ssl connection. >>> But I >>> have not fount an option in the module to not allow http connection. >>> How >>> can I force users to log in from https, and deny connections from >>> httpt? >> >> sorry, while writing my last mail I misunderstood

[SM-USERS] Changing downloaded text format.

2005-11-23 Thread Chris Ong
Hi All, I have users who used to download the message body text for future reference. I have use the View as HTML plugins to let the users view the original HTML mail and the will be able to download the mail as original HTML form. But, when come to mail sent originally in plain text, whe

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: problem with SSL

2005-11-23 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
> I'm not sure if you understand what I need. SSL works fine if the user > enter https://domainname.no when they visit my domain for logging in. I > have put the following in the config.php: > > $change_back_to_http_after_login = 0; > $remain_in_https_if_logged_in_using_https = 0; sounds like you

[SM-USERS] Re: problem with SSL

2005-11-23 Thread Pål Monstad
I have finally got the secure login plugin to force ssl connection. But I have not fount an option in the module to not allow http connection. How can I force users to log in from https, and deny connections from httpt? sorry, while writing my last mail I misunderstood the problem. And yes: I

Re: [SM-USERS] re: problem with SSL

2005-11-23 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
Pål Monstad wrote: > I have finally got the secure login plugin to force ssl connection. > But I have not fount an option in the module to not allow http > connection. How can I force users to log in from https, and deny > connections from httpt? You need to explain how it is users are able to g

[SM-USERS] re: problem with SSL

2005-11-23 Thread Pål Monstad
I have finally got the secure login plugin to force ssl connection. But I have not fount an option in the module to not allow http connection. How can I force users to log in from https, and deny connections from httpt?   And yes: I have read the manual and not found the solution. What about

Re: [SM-USERS] change_sqlpass

2005-11-23 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
Please keep your replies on list. >>> I have modified the change_sqlpass plugin to suit my needs, but for some >>> virtual domains I still use the original version. >>> >> >> >> You use separate SM install for each domain? Have you seen: >> >> http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=47

Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?

2005-11-23 Thread C. Bensend
> Yeah, that's about where they are on my cluster at the moment and the > freshest > apache restart was Sept 08. I'd say you've got other issues. Never said I didn't. :) However, this doesn't happen until one of the session files grows close to (or over) 1MB or so, so I thought it was interest

Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?

2005-11-23 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
John Madden wrote: >>Yes, if you do not use server side sorting and deal with large mailboxes >>then the session can become pretty big in 1.4.5 because it fetches the >>headers of each message in a mailbox in order to do the sort. > > > I'm already on server-side sorting. Soon to be 750k mailb

Re: [SM-USERS] problem with ssl

2005-11-23 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
zamri wrote: > yes. ur right. that is normal coz https is used just for transferring > login information. after that the normal http is used for everything else. > I notice gmail, yahoo and hotmail do the same. But the point is that if he WANTS, the plugin can be configured NOT to redirect back

Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?

2005-11-23 Thread John Madden
> Yes, if you do not use server side sorting and deal with large mailboxes > then the session can become pretty big in 1.4.5 because it fetches the > headers of each message in a mailbox in order to do the sort. I'm already on server-side sorting. Soon to be 750k mailboxes here, not going to do

Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?

2005-11-23 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
On Wed, November 23, 2005 17:09, John Madden wrote: > I've noticed that over time, a SQM session will gradually slow down to > the point I think there's something wrong with the mail server. A > logout/login fixes the issue. Checking into the session files (shared > between nodes over NFS), I fou

Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?

2005-11-23 Thread John Madden
>On my server (OpenBSD 3.6-STABLE, PHP 4.4.0), once the session > files get to about 1MB Apache starts eating RAM like candy. I can > easily let it go until I have httpd processes eating 50-65MB of RAM > each. When this happens, the web interface slows to a crawl for > all users. I'm not see

Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?

2005-11-23 Thread C. Bensend
> I've noticed that over time, a SQM session will gradually slow down to the > point I > think there's something wrong with the mail server. A logout/login fixes > the > issue. Checking into the session files (shared between nodes over NFS), I > found > that while the initial session file is qui

[SM-USERS] session size and performance?

2005-11-23 Thread John Madden
I've noticed that over time, a SQM session will gradually slow down to the point I think there's something wrong with the mail server. A logout/login fixes the issue. Checking into the session files (shared between nodes over NFS), I found that while the initial session file is quite small, it g

Re: [SM-USERS] problem with ssl

2005-11-23 Thread Chris Hilts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 zamri wrote: > yes. ur right. that is normal coz https is used just for transferring > login information. after that the normal http is used for everything else. > I notice gmail, yahoo and hotmail do the same. Which is silly, considering the number o

Re: [SM-USERS] problem with ssl

2005-11-23 Thread zamri
yes. ur right. that is normal coz https is used just for transferring login information. after that the normal http is used for everything else. I notice gmail, yahoo and hotmail do the same. cheers, On Wed, November 23, 2005 12:24 am, Pål Monstad said: > Fedora core 2 and Squirrelmail 1.4.4.3: I