Re: [SM-USERS] Sign out problem on Windows 2003

On 6/28/05, Jonathan Angliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you using Windows 2003 to access to site as well as host it? Yes and no. The first time I spotted the problem, was on an XP box, but the same thing happened on Windows 2000 Pro and when I was playing with "signout.php" on the server.

Re: [SM-USERS] Sign out problem on Windows 2003

On 6/28/05, Paul Lesneiwski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It redirects the browser to your custom signout page URI. The "header('Status: 303 See Other');" line? Isn't it the "header("Location: $signout_page");" line that redirects the browser? > Check what > that is and why that page isn't work

Re: [SM-USERS] Sign out problem on Windows 2003

Hello Henrik Andreasen, On Monday, June 27, 2005, you wrote: > I've just moved over from a Windows 2000 advanced server box, to a > Windows 2003 standard edition and the sign out link didn't work on > 2003 (it is the only problem I've found ATM with SquirrelMail on > Windows 2003). > After lookin

Re: [SM-USERS] Sign out problem on Windows 2003

Henrik Andreasen wrote: I've just moved over from a Windows 2000 advanced server box, to a Windows 2003 standard edition and the sign out link didn't work on 2003 (it is the only problem I've found ATM with SquirrelMail on Windows 2003). After looking in the Apache config file, where I couldn't

[SM-USERS] Sign out problem on Windows 2003

I've just moved over from a Windows 2000 advanced server box, to a Windows 2003 standard edition and the sign out link didn't work on 2003 (it is the only problem I've found ATM with SquirrelMail on Windows 2003). After looking in the Apache config file, where I couldn't find anything there should

Re: [SM-USERS] shared_calendars-2.0.1-1.4.0 doesn't work !!

Does a new page load that is totally blank? Blank page on the same frame (i.e. the page doesn't changed after clicking) It's one or the other, not both. :) The page either changes to something else (including blank) or it stays the same. Which is it? It stay in the same frame. (No Ch

Re: [SM-USERS] shared calendar 2.0.1 error

Carlos Rosero wrote: Hi everyone: I have squirrellmail 1.4.5 with fedora core 3, it is working fine, but I want to install shared calendar plugin and gives me this error: ERROR: Please enable a calendar backend I chequed on the website but I found nothing to give me the solution. I will real

Re: [SM-USERS] Searching Huge Folders

man, 27.06.2005 kl. 16.14 skrev Daniel Watts: > I am trying to search large folders (20,000 messages+). > > I find that if the search results are just a few hundred messages the > search returns after a while. > > If the search results number in the 1,000s or 10,000s then the search > times ou

[SM-USERS] shared calendar 2.0.1 error

Hi everyone: I have squirrellmail 1.4.5 with fedora core 3, it is working fine, but I want to install shared calendar plugin and gives me this error: ERROR: Please enable a calendar backend I chequed on the website but I found nothing to give me the solution. I will really thank if someone can h

Re: [SM-USERS] Composing Window Enhancement Request

PERFECT!!! That's awesome. now I just need to remember it's there. One test so far and auto-pilot clicked the send button just as brain realized 'HEY WAIT!' Thanks. >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I use PINE, too. But not so much since getting more used t

Re: [SM-USERS] [SM 1.4] Notification delivery

I agree with you, but SquirrelMail treat them as "on read" notifications. That the sense of my email. It's a job for sieve ! le 27/06/05 18:10, Marc Powell à [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > > "on delivery" notifications are handled by the SMTP server/MTA, not the > e-mail client. http://www.cse.

RE: [SM-USERS] [SM 1.4] Notification delivery

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:squirrelmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier DUCROT > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 10:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SM-USERS] [SM 1.4] Notification delivery > > Hi all, > > Does anybody know if the Notification

Re: [SM-USERS] Composing Window Enhancement Request

> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> I use PINE, too. But not so much since getting more used to SQM, which is pretty awesome. One feature PINE has is the ability to save an email in a local folder by entering, or selecting a folder in the Fcc

[SM-USERS] [SM 1.4] Notification delivery

Hi all, Does anybody know if the Notification is supposed to work fine ? Here is the problem : - when I send an email and check the box "on delivery" in compose, the notification is sent only after reading the mail - when I send an email and check the box "on read" in compose,it does exactly th

[SM-USERS] Searching Huge Folders

I am trying to search large folders (20,000 messages+). I find that if the search results are just a few hundred messages the search returns after a while. If the search results number in the 1,000s or 10,000s then the search times out. Sometimes with a "Document contains no Data" or an "IMA

RE: [SM-USERS] Global Address Book and squirrelmail-1.4.5

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Tomas Kuliavas > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 1:40 PM > To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Global Address Book and squirrelmail-1.4.5 > > > Hi Everybody, > > > > H

Re: [SM-USERS] Composing Window Enhancement Request

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use PINE, too. But not so much since getting more used to SQM, which is pretty awesome. One feature PINE has is the ability to save an email in a local folder by entering, or selecting a folder in the Fcc text box which in pine is under the

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrellmail/Webmail Page

John Kingsford wrote: Thanks for you quick response. At first I was little bit intimidated. As matter of facts what I am trying to do is, to replace that big bold underlined label "WEBMAIL" user sees when first log on to my squirrelmail server: http://mail.mycompany.com with my company's logo a