[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: Re: Address Book]]]

2005-06-17 Thread shankau
Hi, My other question about address book is 1 Does it search the local and the ldap or just the ldap? 2. What can we do for the autocomplete to search by last name? 3. How do you prevent history when you reply to? Thanks Again > http://www.topolis.lt/docs/sm/squirrelmail/addressbook/_functi

[SM-USERS] patch for 1.4.3a to fix vuln CAN-2005-1769?

2005-06-17 Thread Arnaud Abélard
Hello, I'm looking for a patch for sqm 1.4.3a to fix the most recent vulnerabilties listed on http://www.squirrelmail.org/security/issue/2005-06-15 The patch provided on this page only seems to be for 1.4.4.. Thanks, AA --- SF.Net email

Re: [SM-USERS] How do I block messages coming in for mail addresses that do not exist?

2005-06-17 Thread Chris Hilts
> Anyway, here's the problem. TONS of spam messages are routed to our > "catch-all" email account for (1) people who either used to have an email Catch-all addresses are bad. Spammers often use a dictionary attack, sending to every possible username @yourhost that they can come up with. That mea

Re: [SM-USERS] uw-imap + popa3d + directories

2005-06-17 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>> > Just a question: why Squirrelmail or uw-imap copy e-mails from /var to >> > /home only on login? Shouldn't we move e-mails directly in /home/ >> without >> > user's login? Can I use another program (like procmail) to put e-mails >> on >> > the good location? >> >> >> Pity that the suggestion d

Re: [SM-USERS] 'select/de-select all' option in inbox unavailable

2005-06-17 Thread Melle Kramer
Melle Kramer wrote: > * Browser: Firefox (latest) > * SM version: 1.5 CVS (latest) > * Issue: > The 'all' link in the inbox, to check or uncheck all messages, does not > work in Firefox: it is actually clickable but no messages are selected. And it does not work in Explorer also :) Cheers again,

Re: [SM-USERS] uw-imap + popa3d + directories

2005-06-17 Thread Flatfender
On 6/17/05, Fredrik Jervfors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> My e-mail server is a Debian Sarge one, with Squirrelmail 1.4.4, > >>> uw-imap, popa3d. It has about 1500 e-mail account. > >>> > >>> It works fine if my users use Squirrelmail to read theire e-mails. > >>> > >>> I have also installed po

RE: [SM-USERS] uw-imap + popa3d + directories

2005-06-17 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
>>> My e-mail server is a Debian Sarge one, with Squirrelmail 1.4.4, >>> uw-imap, popa3d. It has about 1500 e-mail account. >>> >>> It works fine if my users use Squirrelmail to read theire e-mails. >>> >>> I have also installed popa3d because my users need to use Outlook or >>> other e-mail client

[SM-USERS] spam

2005-06-17 Thread Robert Mortimer
I would suggest that this is better handled by your Mail Transport Agent. You should look at spamassasin plugins for Sendmail Postfix Qmail (your MTA here). I have a Sendmail / Spamassasin / ClamAV / Procmail setup that works well dropping tagged spam into a spam folder. Idealy is better to refuse

Re: [SM-USERS] How do I block messages coming in for mail addresses that do not exist?

2005-06-17 Thread Tony Earnshaw
fre, 17.06.2005 kl. 08.01 skrev Paul Lesneiwski: > > Squirrelmail wrote: > > Since *YOU* are *NOT* SquirrelMail, can you please change your fullname > setting in your client to something more polite? We appreciate it. His name is Sjoerd, can probably be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Thanks

[SM-USERS] Upgrade advise

2005-06-17 Thread kerryb
I have just installed squirrelmail-1.4.4-1.noarch.rpm and have a problem with the folders option at the top. I believe that the new version, squirrelmail-1.4.5-rc1.tar.gz addresses this issue. Is it possible to upgrade the rpm version with the tar.gz version? I think I tried to install the tar vers

RE: [SM-USERS] uw-imap + popa3d + directories

2005-06-17 Thread Emmanuel . PIEUX
Thank you very much for your help Frederik, but I can't use the "mv method", because my hard disk space is large on /home/ partition, but small on /var/ partition... Just a question: why Squirrelmail or uw-imap copy e-mails from /var to /home only on login? Shouldn't we move e-mails directly in /