Re: [SM-USERS] Release Update

2005-06-15 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Jonathan Angliss, On Thursday, June 16, 2005, you wrote: > I am in the process of repackaging 1.4.5-rc1. Okay, republished. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- Jonathan Angliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Di

[SM-USERS] Release Update

2005-06-15 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hi All, For those that have downloaded the release since my last email, and this one, there was a minor bug caused by a badly applied patch that would generate the following error on login... Parse error: parse error, unexpected T_CASE in functions/mime.php on line 1490 This can quickl

[SM-USERS] [SM-ANNOUNCE] SquirrelMail 1.4.5-RC1 Released

2005-06-15 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Good evening all, I'm pleased to announce the release of SquirrelMail 1.4.5-RC1. This is a long awaited preparation for the final release of 1.4.5 and there is lots packed into this release. In This Release === This release contains a large number of bug fixes, a couple of features e

[SM-USERS] Re: How to install SMplugin?

2005-06-15 Thread p dont think
Please ask on the mailing list if you need FREE help. I only provide private help when I'm paid. :) I have SM for over two years but never try to install any plugins. I have read the README and INSTALL, SETUP in DreamWeaver, etc and also seen the conf.pl and config.php But i dont know wh

Re: [SM-USERS] SQL Calender

2005-06-15 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
Robert Mortimer wrote: I am having problems setting up calendar_sql_backend, I have set up the SQL database, edited the config file and installed the plug-in.unfortunately I have had no joy. Any help appreciated. Rob FC3, dovecot, MySQL & Apache "No joy" is about as helpful as... well... it'

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Chris Green, On Wednesday, June 15, 2005, you wrote: >> I have seen questions about this but no answers. >> >> Sub-folders of INBOX are listed below any folder below INBOX that >> comes before INBOX in the alphabet. This would seem to be a problem >> with the mechanism that places INBOX at

[SM-USERS] SQL Calender

2005-06-15 Thread Robert Mortimer
I am having problems setting up calendar_sql_backend, I have set up the SQL database, edited the config file and installed the plug-in.unfortunately I have had no joy. Any help appreciated. Rob FC3, dovecot, MySQL & Apache --- SF.Net email is s

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Hilts
> Note my IMAP servier setting is dovecot. I have noticed that some of > the INBOX handling PHP code is conditional on setting courrier. > > Additional questions > 1: How good is SM's Dovecot support? Server-specific segments of code are used to work around server "quirks", bugs, and inconsistenci

Re: Fwd: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Hilts
>> It's fixed already (a long time ago) in 1.5.x. >> > How come Fedora 3 still ships with SquirrelMail version 1.4.4-1.FC3 ? I would imagine it's because 1.5.x is considered the "development" tree, while 1.4.x is considered "stable". 1.4.4 is the latest stable release. In other words, Fedora 3 i

[SM-USERS] CSV Import plugin

2005-06-15 Thread Eduardo Elgueta
Hi All, I tried to import my outlook contacts into squirrelmail's address book and got this: Imported CSV file is too big. Contact your system administrator, if you want to import files, that are bigger than 5 KB Another question: ¿Is there any way to add more fields to the address book database

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 03:35:10PM +0200, Marc Groot Koerkamp wrote: > > Chris Green wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > > >> > >> 1: INBOX designated base folder for other protocols such as POP and as > >> a location for default mail delivery. I may be

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 02:31:11PM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > As I said elsewhere I really don't see why any protocol requires any > > sort of special folder. I thought that where the hierarchy was rooted > > was up to the IMAP server implementation (not to mention that the MUA > > could 'm

Fwd: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Robert Mortimer
SOLUTION / FIX On 6/15/05, Marc Groot Koerkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert Mortimer wrote: > > Thank you Mark for the answer > > > > A: It is a known issue and will be fixed in 1.5.x > > It's fixed already (a long time ago) in 1.5.x. > How come Fedora 3 still ships with SquirrelMail vers

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
Chris Green wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > >> >> 1: INBOX designated base folder for other protocols such as POP and as >> a location for default mail delivery. I may be wrong but my understanding >> was that this was originally also the store's root an

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Robert Mortimer
On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > > > 1: INBOX designated base folder for other protocols such as POP and as > > a location for default mail delivery. I may be wrong but my > > understanding was that this was or

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: Re: Address Book]

2005-06-15 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Hi, > > I sincerely aprreciate your reply. I have 2 more questions > > 1. Can SM do IMAP SSL? If it is not STARTTLS (starting encryption in the middle of plain text imap session), then yes. See http://your-server/squirrelmail/doc/authentication.txt http://www.topolis.lt/docs/admin/admin-5.h

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > 1: INBOX designated base folder for other protocols such as POP and as > a location for default mail delivery. I may be wrong but my > understanding was that this was originally also the store's root and > no folders could be cre

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Robert Mortimer
On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:49:15AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > > > It is not just special folders. A folder created at the same level as > > INBOX that is alphabeticly between A and INBOX will be displayed below > > INBOX and inherit INBOX'

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:49:15AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > It is not just special folders. A folder created at the same level as > INBOX that is alphabeticly between A and INBOX will be displayed below > INBOX and inherit INBOX's sub folders. I am tring to solvs an apparent > sort proble

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Robert Mortimer
On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 10:56:47AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:23:16AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > > > On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [SM-USERS] Folder problem

2005-06-15 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just updated to 1.4.4-1.FC3 and have a problem with the folders option > at the top of the screen. As far as I can tell, this is part of > squirrellmail. not a plugin. I can create folders, but I cannot > unsubscribe from folders. It times out with an error after about

Re: [SM-USERS] [Fwd: Re: Address Book]

2005-06-15 Thread shankau
Hi, I sincerely aprreciate your reply. I have 2 more questions 1. Can SM do IMAP SSL? 2. Is it possible to print multiple emails simultaneously(for job apps) 3. What is a global addressbook in SM? Thanks >> We ara K12 school district and have standardized on SM as our mail >> client

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Robert Mortimer
On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:06:12AM +0200, Fredrik Jervfors wrote: > > > The whole idea of 'special' folders seems user unfriendly and unwanted > > > to me. I *hate* MUAs which create all sorts of their own folders all over > > > my home director

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 10:56:47AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > This is one of the issues I have with the way most MUAs and/or IMAP > > servers seem to work. Each has its own (rather restrictive?) view of > > how things should work and imposes that on the user. > > > > A default delivery po

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 10:56:47AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:23:16AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > > On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 08:59:26AM +0100, Rober

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:06:12AM +0200, Fredrik Jervfors wrote: > > The whole idea of 'special' folders seems user unfriendly and unwanted > > to me. I *hate* MUAs which create all sorts of their own folders all over > > my home directory and an IMAP system that does the same (even though they >

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Robert Mortimer
On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:23:16AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 08:59:26AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > > > I have seen questions about this but no answers

[SM-USERS] Folder problem

2005-06-15 Thread kerryb
I just updated to 1.4.4-1.FC3 and have a problem with the folders option at the top of the screen. As far as I can tell, this is part of squirrellmail. not a plugin. I can create folders, but I cannot unsubscribe from folders. It times out with an error after about 30 seconds. Fatal error: Maximum

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:23:16AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 08:59:26AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > > I have seen questions about this but no answers. > > > > > > Sub-folders of INBOX are listed below any fol

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> The whole idea of 'special' folders seems user unfriendly and unwanted > to me. I *hate* MUAs which create all sorts of their own folders all over > my home directory and an IMAP system that does the same (even though they > may not be in my home space) is almost as bad. Why should I always hav

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Robert Mortimer
On 6/15/05, Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 08:59:26AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > > I have seen questions about this but no answers. > > > > Sub-folders of INBOX are listed below any folder below INBOX that > > comes before INBOX in the alphabet. This would see

Re: [SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 08:59:26AM +0100, Robert Mortimer wrote: > I have seen questions about this but no answers. > > Sub-folders of INBOX are listed below any folder below INBOX that > comes before INBOX in the alphabet. This would seem to be a problem > with the mechanism that places INBOX at

[SM-USERS] Mailfolder sort

2005-06-15 Thread Robert Mortimer
I have seen questions about this but no answers. Sub-folders of INBOX are listed below any folder below INBOX that comes before INBOX in the alphabet. This would seem to be a problem with the mechanism that places INBOX at the top and then sorts subsequent folders below. When $list_special_folder