[SM-USERS] Upgrade from 1.2.8 to 1.4.4.1 old folders dont show up

2005-05-18 Thread justin
Hello all, This is my first post and I will thank you all in advance. My Squirrelmail server that has done me wonders for the last couple years came to a halt this morning so I decided to build a new machine. The old machine was a 1.2.8 build on RH 7.2 and the new machine is a FC3 box with 1.4.4.

Re: [SM-USERS] Cingular & Treo - You must be logged in to access this page

2005-05-18 Thread Phillip T. George
Phillip T. George wrote: Hello all, I have a client who is having problem with Squirrelmail (version 1.4.3...though I also tried version 1.5.0/CVS, and had the same results). Anyway, when he puts his username and password in properly and logs in, he receives the dreaded message of: ERROR: You m

[SM-USERS] Incorrect quoting after resuming draft message

2005-05-18 Thread Sean
Using 1.4.4 here and after resuming a draft message, the quoting of the message being replied-to is not correct. It seems all the lines from each paragraph receive only one leading '>' character regardless of how many screen lines are needed to contain the text. Anyone have a fix? Thanks, Sea

Re: [SM-USERS] List archive

2005-05-18 Thread Chris Hilts
> Looks like the site hosting the mail archive is severely overloaded. If > I dont get an error about the max connections being reached, it takes > ages before a pages is being presented. Arent there any mirrors? Thanks SourceForge is having some issues - it's not just the list archives being affe

[SM-USERS] List archive

2005-05-18 Thread Patrick Donker
Guys, Looks like the site hosting the mail archive is severely overloaded. If I dont get an error about the max connections being reached, it takes ages before a pages is being presented. Arent there any mirrors? Thanks -Patrick --- This SF.Net e

[SM-USERS] SquirrelMail and IE -- anybody seeing problems?

2005-05-18 Thread Rob Tanner
Hi, Over the last several; months we're seeing more and more people having problems using Squirrelmail (v1.4.2) from Internet Explorer. There's been no change to Squirrelmail and non-IE browsers work just fine. Unfortunately, telling folks just to use Firefox, while good advice all around, is no

Re: [SM-USERS] How stable is 1.5x?

2005-05-18 Thread Chris Hilts
>> Search the mailing list. There were patches posted against 1.4.3 >> (easily modifiable to 1.4.4) so you could use the mailto href. 1.5.x is stable enough for use. I use it myself daily as my main email client. That said, if you're leery about using it in production, do a parallel install of

Re: [SM-USERS] How stable is 1.5x?

2005-05-18 Thread Dave Weiner
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 10:39, Ricardo Stella wrote: > Search the mailing list. There were patches posted against 1.4.3 > (easily modifiable to 1.4.4) so you could use the mailto href. I've tried searching the mailing list, and I'm not having any luck. > I believe it's also on the wiki all the

Re: [SM-USERS] cyrus with unix hierarchy

2005-05-18 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
John Madden wrote: >> I will check out the reconstruct response tomorrow morning. So you're >> saying that the problem is that Cyrus isn't reporting these as mailboxes? >> Thunderbird and OSX Mail handle things just fine, so I >> don't see why Squirrelmail shouldn't. > > Oh, then perhaps that's n

Re: [SM-USERS] How stable is 1.5x?

2005-05-18 Thread Ricardo Stella
Search the mailing list. There were patches posted against 1.4.3 (easily modifiable to 1.4.4) so you could use the mailto href. I believe it's also on the wiki all the way at the end. I checked for them about a couple of weeks ago and they were still there... My .02... Dave Weiner wrote: Gree

[SM-USERS] How stable is 1.5x?

2005-05-18 Thread Dave Weiner
Greetings everyone! Here at our company, we find ourselves needed one of the features of 1.5x, mainly the ability to handle mailto href's in Windows with SM as the default mail handler. The server that SM is installed on is one of the primary interfaces to our mailsystem, so my boss is rightly