Re: [SM-USERS] Shared Calendar

2005-05-03 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
t *will* choke... I leave that at their doorstep). That is what I found. Regarding the ALL DAY event, whenever I import this: BEGIN:VEVENT UID:sm_cal_evt_20050420T060554Z_zuck_com SEQUENCE:0 PRIORITY:5 CREATED:20050420T060554Z LAST-MODIFIED:20050420T060554Z STATUS: DTSTART:20050503 SUMMARY:Mung

[SM-USERS] how do we Unsubscribe from SquirrelMail????

2005-05-03 Thread CahokiaHSReunion
I need to Unsubscribe from SquirrelMail --  we no longer will be using it.  How can I do that?   Jan

Re: [SM-USERS] Enhanced addressbook (contact list)

2005-05-03 Thread beaujolais
Quoting p dont think <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'm using squirrelmail for family e-mails only and I'd need better address > book. > > What I mean is I'd like to have some SIMPLE file based address book with > > additional fields like Address, Telephone, > > > > Is there something like this av

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance tuning, large mailboxes and PMDF

2005-05-03 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
Trust me, he is not alone she. :) --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NE

Re: [SM-USERS] Fresh Install Using RPM...how to admin ?

2005-05-03 Thread andien my mine
Sorry for miss send... - Original Message - From: "Paul Lesneiwski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "andien my mine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, smu Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Fresh Install Using RPM...how to admin ? Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 13:22:32 -0700 > > Please respond on-list and please do not top p

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance tuning, large mailboxes and PMDF

2005-05-03 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
Becky L. Sabino, LAN Administrator wrote: > Just FYI: > > > I installed 1.5.1 and here were the results: > > > 1.5.1 > From the time I clicked login until folder list displayed 55 > seconds From the time I clicked login until inbox messages displayed 4 > min 44 seconds > > 1.4.3 > From the time I

Re: [SM-USERS] Fresh Install Using RPM...how to admin ?

2005-05-03 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
Please respond on-list and please do not top post. Hi guys, I just finish installing my squirrelmail (the latest version), and I'm able to browse it well, but is it posible for me to admin my squirrelmail via browser ? can someone point the way...please ? Please read the website and familiarize y

Re: [SM-USERS] Help with configuration for virtual hosts

2005-05-03 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
Ben Holt wrote: david rankin said the following on 05/03/05 10:26: Mates, Hopefully a simple questions. I have SM installed in /var/www/html/sqmail. All works well with rbpllc.com and rankin-bertin.com that use /var/www/html as their document root. But, I also have 3 other domains (all point to

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance tuning, large mailboxes and PMDF

2005-05-03 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
Chris Hilts wrote: >> Thanks for the quick reply, I'll give 1.5.1 a shot. Any >> guestimate on when it might be released as a stable version? Believe me, >> I >> would LOVE to switch to a different IMAP server, I've been begging to go >> to sendmail for years with no success. *sigh*. I'll let y

Re: [SM-USERS] Fresh Install Using RPM...how to admin ?

2005-05-03 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
andien my mine wrote: Hi guys, I just finish installing my squirrelmail (the latest version), and I'm able to browse it well, but is it posible for me to admin my squirrelmail via browser ? can someone point the way...please ? Please read the website and familiarize yourself with SM before postin

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance tuning, large mailboxes and PMDF

2005-05-03 Thread Becky L. Sabino, LAN Administrator
Just FYI: I installed 1.5.1 and here were the results: 1.5.1 From the time I clicked login until folder list displayed 55 seconds From the time I clicked login until inbox messages displayed 4 min 44 seconds 1.4.3 From th

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance tuning, large mailboxes and PMDF

2005-05-03 Thread Chris Hilts
> Thanks for the quick reply, I'll give 1.5.1 a shot. Any > guestimate on when it might be released as a stable version? Believe me, I > would LOVE to switch to a different IMAP server, I've been begging to go > to sendmail for years with no success. *sigh*. I'll let you know what > impact 1.5.1

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance tuning, large mailboxes and PMDF

2005-05-03 Thread Tony Earnshaw
tir, 03.05.2005 kl. 20.16 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > My configuration: > > SM v 1.4.4 > XAMPP 1.4.13 > Apache 2.0.53 > PHP 4.3.11 > MySQL 4.1.11 > eAccelerator 0.9.2a > running on Fedora Core 3 > hp proliant DL360 > 2GB RAM > intel xeon 3.6GHz CPU > > Our IMAP server is PMDF V6.2 runnin

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance tuning, large mailboxes and PMDF

2005-05-03 Thread Becky L. Sabino, LAN Administrator
Thanks for the quick reply, I'll give 1.5.1 a shot. Any guestimate on when it might be released as a stable version? Believe me, I would LOVE to switch to a different IMAP server, I've been begging to go to sendmail for years with no success. *sigh*. I'll

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance tuning, large mailboxes and PMDF

2005-05-03 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My configuration: > > > SM v 1.4.4 > XAMPP 1.4.13 > Apache 2.0.53 > PHP 4.3.11 > MySQL 4.1.11 > eAccelerator 0.9.2a running on Fedora Core 3 hp proliant DL360 2GB RAM > intel xeon 3.6GHz CPU > > Our IMAP server is PMDF V6.2 running on VMS > > > SqirrelMail runs like a c

[SM-USERS] Performance tuning, large mailboxes and PMDF

2005-05-03 Thread sabino
My configuration: SM v 1.4.4 XAMPP 1.4.13 Apache 2.0.53 PHP 4.3.11 MySQL 4.1.11 eAccelerator 0.9.2a running on Fedora Core 3 hp proliant DL360 2GB RAM intel xeon 3.6GHz CPU Our IMAP server is PMDF V6.2 running on VMS SqirrelMail runs like a charm on smaller mailboxes but is v-e-r-y slow

Re: [SM-USERS] Help with configuration for virtual hosts

2005-05-03 Thread Ben Holt
david rankin said the following on 05/03/05 10:26: > Mates, > >Hopefully a simple questions. I have SM installed in > /var/www/html/sqmail. All works well with rbpllc.com and > rankin-bertin.com that use /var/www/html as their document root. But, I > also have 3 other domains (all point to the

[SM-USERS] Help with configuration for virtual hosts

2005-05-03 Thread david rankin
Mates, Hopefully a simple questions. I have SM installed in /var/www/html/sqmail. All works well with rbpllc.com and rankin-bertin.com that use /var/www/html as their document root. But, I also have 3 other domains (all point to the same IP) that point to /var/www/glf and /var/www/drr and /v

RE: [SM-USERS] Invalid Mask Error

2005-05-03 Thread Mohsin Shad
The default_folder_prefix is set to '' in the SM config.php and the same in the config_local.php. Other thoughts? -Original Message- From: Jonathan Angliss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:12 AM To: Mohsin Shad Cc: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject:

[SM-USERS] RE: Problem while sending mail...

2005-05-03 Thread Webmaster
I'm coming back with my problem that appears just after send a mail, otherwise everything is ok! I can't reinstall PHP/Apache too many thing are now running on it... I checked httpd.conf but I really don't know what could be the matter! I have several VHosts and squirrelmail.conf add another one (i

Re: [SM-USERS] Invalid Mask Error

2005-05-03 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Mohsin Shad, On Tuesday, May 03, 2005, you wrote: > I am trying to set up a server on FC3 using sendmail, > dovecot and Squirrelmail. Sendmail and Dovecot appear > to be working just fine as I can send and receive > mails using pop3 and also directly on localhost. > When I try to use Squirr

Re: [SM-USERS] performance

2005-05-03 Thread Tony Earnshaw
tir, 03.05.2005 kl. 13.13 skrev Jerry Mersel: > For the longest time I had this problem of performance when using > the squirrelmail server. I finally found the problem, and I hope that > it can help someone else. > The problem was browscap.ini. After removing this file and its use via > php.i

[SM-USERS] Invalid Mask Error

2005-05-03 Thread Mohsin Shad
I am trying to set up a server on FC3 using sendmail, dovecot and Squirrelmail. Sendmail and Dovecot appear to be working just fine as I can send and receive mails using pop3 and also directly on localhost. When I try to use Squirrelmail I get an error as follows: ERROR : Could not complete reque

[SM-USERS] Fresh Install Using RPM...how to admin ?

2005-05-03 Thread andien my mine
Hi guys, I just finish installing my squirrelmail (the latest version), and I'm able to browse it well, but is it posible for me to admin my squirrelmail via browser ? can someone point the way...please ? Andien -- ___ Check out the latest SMS services

[SM-USERS] Re: OT: Request for PHP Accelerator 1.3.3r2

2005-05-03 Thread Daniel Watts
Try the UK mirror: http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk/ I JUST downloaded from there 20 mins ago. SM-Development wrote: Hi List, Call anyone who uses PHPA v 1.3.3r2 for Linux Intel (glibc2.1.3) + PHP4.1.0 It seems the main site is not accesible. Thanks.

[SM-USERS] Deleting Mail Folders

2005-05-03 Thread Graham Pontin
I am using SquirrelMail 1.4.4 on a Mac XServe running OS 10.3.9. One of the mail accounts appears corrupt as any mail sent to it simply disappears. I have tried deleting to user account but this does not delete the mail box. I have added a mail administrator account which now allows me to 'see'

[SM-USERS] performance

2005-05-03 Thread Jerry Mersel
Hi: For the longest time I had this problem of performance when using the squirrelmail server. I finally found the problem, and I hope that it can help someone else. The problem was browscap.ini. After removing this file and its use via php.ini the performance improved. I found this surprising s

Re: [SM-USERS] Shared Calendar

2005-05-03 Thread Joel Zucker
t >> this: >> >> BEGIN:VEVENT >> UID:sm_cal_evt_20050420T060554Z_zuck_com >> SEQUENCE:0 >> PRIORITY:5 >> CREATED:20050420T060554Z >> LAST-MODIFIED:20050420T060554Z >> STATUS: >> DTSTART:20050503 >> SUMMARY:Mungolaya Water Change >>

Re: [SM-USERS] Shared Calendar

2005-05-03 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
EATED:20050420T060554Z LAST-MODIFIED:20050420T060554Z STATUS: DTSTART:20050503 SUMMARY:Mungolaya Water Change DESCRIPTION: COMMENT: DTEND:20050503 RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=3;UNTIL=20050831T14Z DTSTAMP:20050420T060554Z END:VEVENT it is scheduled at 5:00PM... Yes, this is probably the problem that I described