Re: [SM-USERS] Shared Calendar

2005-04-29 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
Thanx for sending that new version with the checkbox! Unfortunately I am getting the same behavior with the new exported file, as mentioned below, when attempting to import into Outlook 2003. I kind of expected this as I had already saved the previous file in MS PC format with no success. I wish

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Large squirrelmail install

2005-04-29 Thread John Madden
> We've already got NFS setup and in use for our Maildirs > (qmail/vpopmail). We'll be load-balancing with an F5 BigIP, so I can > turn persistence on and maybe make the sessions work satisfactorily > over NFS. I just don't want to beat my NFS server to death, because > it's pretty busy already. I

Re: [SM-USERS] Problem with INBOX.Sent in all versions of SM

2005-04-29 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Tony Sciortino wrote: Hello everyone. Has anyone had a chance to look at this issue? Even though it seems there was a fix put out it is not working. Thoughts? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Sciortino Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 3:

Re: [SM-USERS] Shared Calendar

2005-04-29 Thread Joel Zucker
Hey Paul, Thanx for sending that new version with the checkbox! Unfortunately I am getting the same behavior with the new exported file, as mentioned below, when attempting to import into Outlook 2003. I kind of expected this as I had already saved the previous file in MS PC format with no succe

Re: [SM-USERS] FreeBSD problem after upgrading PHP

2005-04-29 Thread Graeme
p dont think said: > > > Mike Oliveri wrote: >> Anyone out there running FreeBSD? I recently upgraded to PHP 4.3.11 >> from Ports, and suddenly I'm getting core dumps no matter what I do >> with PHP, even pulling a page with phpinfo() on it or running php -i >> from the command line. >> >> I'm gett

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Large squirrelmail install

2005-04-29 Thread Jason S
On 4/29/05, John Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, I have been following that thread closely. Some very good points > > have been made. I've been using SQL based prefs for a while, so that > > will not be an issue. My concerns now (from a squirrelmail standpoint) > > are getting the sessio

Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect

2005-04-29 Thread Tuc at Beach House
> > I can reproduce "Warning: Unknown(): Your script possibly relies on a > session side-effect which existed until PHP 4.2.3." error only if I enable > session.auto_start. I think this means that session.auto_start=1 is not > solution to your problems or we have to fix something in squirrelmail.

Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect

2005-04-29 Thread John Madden
> b) Two different servers (or the same server) trying to access the > session data for the same SID at the same time. How can a user of SM > generate two accesses to session data at the same time?. And how do you > use SM to generate two pararell accesses from two different webservers > in the clu

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Large squirrelmail install

2005-04-29 Thread John Madden
> Yes, I have been following that thread closely. Some very good points > have been made. I've been using SQL based prefs for a while, so that > will not be an issue. My concerns now (from a squirrelmail standpoint) > are getting the sessions stored in a DB and what to do about the > temporary atta

Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect

2005-04-29 Thread p dont think
Rafael Martinez Guerrero wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:18, John Madden wrote: > >>>No, not at all. Three consecutive request can be served by three >>>different webservers. >> >>So is there something in your SQL session handler (locking?) that prevents >>multiple s

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Large squirrelmail install

2005-04-29 Thread p dont think
Jason S wrote: On 4/29/05, p dont think <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Daniel W wrote: Jason S wrote: I've been using squirrelmail successfully for about 2 years with a small userbase (about 1000). I have the opportunity to setup a webmail system for a large company (approx 150,000) users. They curre

Re: [SM-USERS] Shared Calendar plug-in status?

2005-04-29 Thread John Locke
Got it... Thanks! Will check it out next week. On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 10:41 -0700, Paul Lesneiwski wrote: > Sending it to you offlist. I think most bugs have been tackled, but > people only tend to give me feedback when things are broken. :-p > > Cheers, > > Paul > > -- John Locke "Open So

Re: [SM-USERS] Enhanced addressbook (contact list)

2005-04-29 Thread p dont think
I'm using squirrelmail for family e-mails only and I'd need better address book. What I mean is I'd like to have some SIMPLE file based address book with additional fields like Address, Telephone, Is there something like this available? vCard code is in the development stream right now with th

Re: [SM-USERS] FreeBSD problem after upgrading PHP

2005-04-29 Thread Graeme
Mike Oliveri said: > Anyone out there running FreeBSD? I recently upgraded to PHP 4.3.11 > from Ports, and suddenly I'm getting core dumps no matter what I do > with PHP, even pulling a page with phpinfo() on it or running php -i > from the command line. > > I'm getting resubscribed to the FreeBSD

Re: [SM-USERS] FreeBSD problem after upgrading PHP

2005-04-29 Thread p dont think
Mike Oliveri wrote: Anyone out there running FreeBSD? I recently upgraded to PHP 4.3.11 from Ports, and suddenly I'm getting core dumps no matter what I do with PHP, even pulling a page with phpinfo() on it or running php -i from the command line. I'm getting resubscribed to the FreeBSD list, but

Re: [SM-USERS] Shared Calendar plug-in status?

2005-04-29 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
> It's been quite a while since I've read this list, and so I'm thrilled > to find the discussions about the iCal-compliant Shared Calendar > plug-in. This is huge. Read and write support for iCalendar, public, > private and shared groups, database back end? Awesome! > > I've been u

[SM-USERS] FreeBSD problem after upgrading PHP

2005-04-29 Thread Mike Oliveri
Anyone out there running FreeBSD? I recently upgraded to PHP 4.3.11 from Ports, and suddenly I'm getting core dumps no matter what I do with PHP, even pulling a page with phpinfo() on it or running php -i from the command line. I'm getting resubscribed to the FreeBSD list, but wondering if anyone

[SM-USERS] Shared Calendar plug-in status?

2005-04-29 Thread John Locke
Hi, It's been quite a while since I've read this list, and so I'm thrilled to find the discussions about the iCal-compliant Shared Calendar plug-in. This is huge. Read and write support for iCalendar, public, private and shared groups, database back end? Awesome! I've been using SM for years, alo

Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect

2005-04-29 Thread Rafael Martinez Guerrero
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:18, John Madden wrote: > > No, not at all. Three consecutive request can be served by three > > different webservers. > > So is there something in your SQL session handler (locking?) that prevents > multiple servers from clashing? > > John > John, I do not understand wh

Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect

2005-04-29 Thread Rafael Martinez Guerrero
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:23, Jonathan Angliss wrote: [] > > > Can this happen? What is the probability of two different users getting > > the same session ID? > > Note it is not only two users, but two web servers. It is possible, > but the possibility of it is probably VERY slim. The

Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect

2005-04-29 Thread Rafael Martinez Guerrero
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 22:21, p dont think wrote: [] > > Hrm. Have you done any special tweaking to your postgres setup to make > it as highly responsive as you obviously need it to be? > - postgresql 7.4.7 in a server with 4GB ram and 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz. - Backup/log

Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect

2005-04-29 Thread Rafael Martinez Guerrero
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:20, John Madden wrote: [] > > Another reason is that we want full/instantaneous automatic feilover. If > > we use persistence with a 15-second timeout, many users will get > > problems if the server they are using stops working. > > Doesn't LVS handle this automagicall

Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect

2005-04-29 Thread Rafael Martinez Guerrero
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 22:13, p dont think wrote: [] > > > > We have to proxy servers in front of the imap servers, and three imap > > servers connected to an EVA RAID storage solution from HP running a > > ServiceGuard software. > > What IMAP server are you using? Does Perdition work wel

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Large squirrelmail install

2005-04-29 Thread Jason S
On 4/29/05, p dont think <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Daniel W wrote: > > Jason S wrote: > > > >> I've been using squirrelmail successfully for about 2 years with a > >> small userbase (about 1000). I have the opportunity to setup a webmail > >> system for a large company (approx 150,000) use

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Large squirrelmail install

2005-04-29 Thread p dont think
Daniel W wrote: Jason S wrote: I've been using squirrelmail successfully for about 2 years with a small userbase (about 1000). I have the opportunity to setup a webmail system for a large company (approx 150,000) users. They currently only offer pop3 access and a heavily modified version of Omail