[SM-USERS] check spelling

2004-12-03 Thread chidzey
Hi Can someone help me please since we change our provider to exetel.com.au I haven't been able to use the check spelling facility. Hlp please. Cheers, Maria-Elena Chidzey --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest &

Re: [SM-USERS] Loign Error when sending message

2004-12-03 Thread manu revah
> > On Thu, December 2, 2004 5:22 pm, Kevin Carpenter said: >> All - >> >> I'm having an annoying problem - fairly frequently after composing a >> message, I hit "Send" and am greeted with "Error - you must be logged in >> to access this page. Go to the login page". The message is >> lost. I've

Re: [SM-USERS] sporadic ultra-slow logins

2004-12-03 Thread manu revah
> > On Dec 2, 2004, at 5:54 AM, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > >> tor, 02.12.2004 kl. 03.15 skrev Joe Auty: >> >>> here's my deal.. I'm hoping somebody can help me, I'd be truly >>> appreciative! >>> >>> What is the best way to troubleshoot SM when it takes ultra-long >>> periods of time (sometimes minutes

[SM-USERS] Problems and questions

2004-12-03 Thread Sasha Futran
I have version 1.2.11, This morning I could not get the login page to appear. After downloading your new patch it did appear. Have no idea how the two might be related. Should I be using the latest version? I am on an iMac G5, OSX. I have also recently -- in the last month -- begun to receive to

Re: [SM-USERS] Trying to set up my SquirrelMail in Outlook Express

2004-12-03 Thread Ean Kingston
Tim, I'm not sure why you signed your e-mail Christie but in any case, you do not need SquirrelMail at all to use MSN. You need to ask MSN for information on how to setup Outlook Express to use their e-mail service. Get them to talk you through it step-by-step if you have to. You mentioned that

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Chris Shenton wrote: > Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Peter Campion-Bye wrote: I'm using courier under trustix, and SM is horribly slow when reading mail in a folder with 14k items (not counting subfolders) >>> >>> Do you have 'Allow server-side sorting = true' (Gen

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Chris Shenton
Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Peter Campion-Bye wrote: >>> >>> I'm using courier under trustix, and SM is horribly slow when reading >>> mail in a folder with 14k items (not counting subfolders) >> >> Do you have 'Allow server-side sorting = true' (General options - item 12)? >> My

Re: [SM-USERS] /tmp directory permissions?

2004-12-03 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> At 06:09 PM 12/2/2004, you wrote: >>Execute permissions on directories means that users can change into the >>directory. It has no effect on whether the files inside are executable. >>Most versions of PHP write their session files to /tmp, so SquirrelMail >>will require it if that's how your PHP

Re: [SM-USERS] /tmp directory permissions?

2004-12-03 Thread Scott Kopel
when I turn on safe_mode in php.ini, I get the following error during SM login attempt Error opening ../data/default_pref Default preference file not found or not readable! Please contact your system administrator and report this error. At 06:09 PM 12/2/2004, you wrote: Execute permissions on dir

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Jay Lee wrote: > Morten Nilsen said: >> Chris Mason wrote: >>> We have performance issues with Squirrelmail and imap in general due to >>> users with large amounts of mail. We have one user, the president of the >>> company, who insists on keeping every mail he ever sent anyone or >>>received, >>>

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Jay Lee
Peter Campion-Bye said: > I can definitely recommend Courier as a worthwhile improvement over uw. I > looked at Cyrus, but as all the users on my network are also shell account > users it seemed unnecessarily complex. Courier IMHO, offers sysadmins the best of both worlds, you can use auth_pam an

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Peter Campion-Bye wrote: >> >> I'm using courier under trustix, and SM is horribly slow when reading >> mail in a folder with 14k items (not counting subfolders) > > Do you have 'Allow server-side sorting = true' (General options - item 12)? > My largest folder currently has 4100 items, and loads

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Jay Lee
Morten Nilsen said: > Chris Mason wrote: >> We have performance issues with Squirrelmail and imap in general due to >> users with large amounts of mail. We have one user, the president of the >> company, who insists on keeping every mail he ever sent anyone or >>received, >> and routinely sends 8 M

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Peter Campion-Bye
> > I'm using courier under trustix, and SM is horribly slow when reading > mail in a folder with 14k items (not counting subfolders) Do you have 'Allow server-side sorting = true' (General options - item 12)? My largest folder currently has 4100 items, and loads in under a second. --

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Todd Slater
Chris Mason wrote: [snip] I suspect the the standard Redhat 9 uw-imap is not the best imap implementation for this type of usage. Cyrus is interesting but I suspect a bear to administer, and I don’t know what else to consider. What have you found to be faster for users with huge mail accounts, what

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Peter Campion-Bye wrote: >> >> I suspect the the standard Redhat 9 uw-imap is not the best imap >> implementation for this type of usage. Cyrus is interesting but I suspect >> a >> bear to administer, and I don’t know what else to consider. What have you >> found to be faster for users with huge ma

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Peter Campion-Bye
> > I suspect the the standard Redhat 9 uw-imap is not the best imap > implementation for this type of usage. Cyrus is interesting but I suspect > a > bear to administer, and I don’t know what else to consider. What have you > found to be faster for users with huge mail accounts, what kind of speed

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread John Madden
>> We have performance issues with Squirrelmail and imap in general due >> to users with large amounts of mail. We have one user, the president >> of the company, who insists on keeping every mail he ever sent anyone >> or received, and routinely sends 8 MB emails. His mail is topping 4 GB >> sorte

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Chris Mason wrote: > We have performance issues with Squirrelmail and imap in general due to > users with large amounts of mail. We have one user, the president of the > company, who insists on keeping every mail he ever sent anyone or received, > and routinely sends 8 MB emails. His mail is toppin

Re: [SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Jay Lee
Chris Mason said: > We have performance issues with Squirrelmail and imap in general due to > users with large amounts of mail. We have one user, the president of the > company, who insists on keeping every mail he ever sent anyone or > received, Same thing I do, why should I be bothered to pull

Re: [SM-USERS] Several general questions regarding SM (massmailing, Hardware Suggestions, Security Updates)

2004-12-03 Thread Benjamin Zeller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tomas Kuliavas schrieb: |>|>Regarding the amount of attendance, we are asking ourselves, how much |>|>security-updates have been released during the last year. Is there any |>|>list, where one could find out? |>| |>| |>| Not really. We are talking abou

Re: [SM-USERS] Several general questions regarding SM (massmailing, Hardware Suggestions, Security Updates)

2004-12-03 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> |>Regarding the amount of attendance, we are asking ourselves, how much > |>security-updates have been released during the last year. Is there any > |>list, where one could find out? > | > | > | Not really. We are talking about being more intentional about that, but > | if you want to be the saf

Re: [SM-USERS] Several general questions regarding SM (massmailing, Hardware Suggestions, Security Updates)

2004-12-03 Thread Benjamin Zeller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Angliss schrieb: | Hello Benjamin, | On Thursday, December 02, 2004, Benjamin Zeller wrote... | | |>But due to the fact, that SuSE (the distribution we use) is offering |>SM as an RPM, we'll be save enough to use their rpm, which is |>maintaine

[SM-USERS] Looking for advice on best IMAP implementation for speed

2004-12-03 Thread Chris Mason
We have performance issues with Squirrelmail and imap in general due to users with large amounts of mail. We have one user, the president of the company, who insists on keeping every mail he ever sent anyone or received, and routinely sends 8 MB emails. His mail is topping 4 GB sorted into various

[SM-USERS] remove attachments

2004-12-03 Thread konidalau
hi how to disappear Attachments from web interface in squirrelmail. usha __ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo -