Re: [SM-USERS] Attachments problem : Solved with a trick

2004-11-28 Thread p dont think
some days ago i've send a post in order to found people that resolved the In the fixing process i've pointed out that the "bug" was a string of exactly 8 bytes ( all are LF's ) send over the download channel by the "head" command. These bytes shifts the rest of downloaded file and after receive it

Re: [SM-USERS] Different Servers - imapServerAddress

2004-11-28 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>>> I would like to implement a different Web and Mail server. Using the >>> $imapServerAddress I can point to the Mail Server, and see the mail, >>> but the Folders present a problem for browser indicating a Create >>> Failure. >>> >>> Is it possible to separate the Squirrelmail Web Pages and the

Re: [SM-USERS] cookies

2004-11-28 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Aloha, > > > > Would you, > > could you place a notice the sign on form (where you put in your e-mail > address and password) to access the mail (on the website) saying: TO > ACCESS > YOUR MAILBOX, YOU NEED TO HAVE YOUR COOKIES ENABLED > > > > PLEASE. > > > > This dummy over here wit

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachments problem : Solved with a trick

2004-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
> So if some people facing this problem feel free to contact me at address : > [EMAIL PROTECTED] in order to obtain teh ssource of my trick ( less of > 20 lines of code ). Instead of forcing people to mail you for what you did to fix it, why not post a patch to the list (diff -uw oldfile newfile

Re: [SM-USERS] cookies

2004-11-28 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> could you place a notice the sign on form (where you put in your e-mail > address and password) to access the mail (on the website) saying: TO > ACCESS > YOUR MAILBOX, YOU NEED TO HAVE YOUR COOKIES ENABLED Almost every web page where you have to login uses cookies, so pointing it out is kind of