[SM-USERS] Problem deleting message from the 2nd page on

2004-11-16 Thread julio
Hello all, When I try to delete a message from the second page on, it seems to delete the last message, but deletes the selected one. (It seems it doesn't refresh the screen) The only way I can be sure what message was deleted is doing a logout and login again. After deleting one message, the sele

[SM-USERS] External Login Not Completing Login

2004-11-16 Thread Brett Patterson
Hey guys.  I know the subject is fairly vague, but there’s no “short” way to describe my problem/question.   I am writing a script that will allow users to log-in to their webmail account from our front page.  So I have the form which submits to another script so that the login username c

Re: [SM-USERS] sasql plugin problem with DB.php

2004-11-16 Thread p dont think
Fatal error: Failed opening required 'DB.php' (include_path='./') in /usr/share/squirrelmail-1.4.1/plugins/sasql/sasql_db.php on line 5 And this is correct. I was unable to find any DB.php file under /. But this problem seems not to be sasql specific. I use Squirrelmail version 1.4.1 with php in ve

[SM-USERS] sasql plugin problem with DB.php

2004-11-16 Thread Thorsten Müller
Hello list members, sorry for this dumb question, but i don't know where to find further information. I tried searching google and google groups and find out that more people had this problem but i couldn't find a solution. Okay, but know to the problem: I downloaded and installed the sasql plugin

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread Viren Patel
I did, but no change: bash$ sysctl -w kern.maxfiles=65536 kern.maxfiles: 12328 -> 65536 bash$ sysctl -w kern.maxfilesperproc=32768 kern.maxfilesperproc: 11095 -> 32768 Output of top: last pid: 53114; load averages: 0.53, 0.25, 0.12up 9+20:05:09 15:41:11 78 processes: 2 running, 76 sle

Re: [SM-USERS] FC3 + SM 1.4.0 = Login fail

2004-11-16 Thread Chris Hilts
> I just upgraded to FC3 and simply tared up the SM 1.4.0 and moved it over > to the new server. After spending hours messing around with the php.ini > files and searching the net for clues, I simply set up a quick test > install of SM 1.5.0. Login problem went away. Just an FYI for the next >

Re: [SM-USERS] Solved: giving up ...

2004-11-16 Thread Lesli St. Clair
I didn't see errors in any of the logs, unfortuantely. I had a suspiscion earlier that that might be the problem, but the parameters I used were given to me by a Sun guy who set up some machines, and they were defintely wrong. Now I know better. John Madden wrote: set rlim_fd_max=8192

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread Lesli St. Clair
Since you're running FreeBSD, my solution may not work for you, but ... check your file handles! Viren Patel wrote: I have been following this thread with great interest. Here are my 4 cents. We have a webmail setup as follows: Dual AMD Athlon MP 2400 w/ 1 GB RAM RAID 5 (3 ATA133 7200 RPM d

Re: [SM-USERS] Solved: giving up ...

2004-11-16 Thread John Madden
> set rlim_fd_max=8192 > set rlim_fd_cur=1024 > > I had used settings recommended by Sun (no comment!). So far, so good. > The load testing software has 500 users logging in 5 seconds apart, with > no problems yet. Interesting. Had you not been getting any errors anywhere about running out of fi

[SM-USERS] FC3 + SM 1.4.0 = Login fail

2004-11-16 Thread Rich
I just upgraded to FC3 and simply tared up the SM 1.4.0 and moved it over to the new server. After spending hours messing around with the php.ini files and searching the net for clues, I simply set up a quick test install of SM 1.5.0. Login problem went away. Just an FYI for the next guy searchi

[SM-USERS] Solved: giving up ...

2004-11-16 Thread Lesli St. Clair
Well, whatever goes on when users log in, file handles/descriptors must play a role. On the advice of a member group, I changed them in /etc/system to: set rlim_fd_max=8192 set rlim_fd_cur=1024 I had used settings recommended by Sun (no comment!). So far, so good. The load testing software has

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread p dont think
More thoughts that may or may not have made it into this thread (sorry, not reading as closely as I should be...): - try disabling server side threading if it was even on (and supported) in the first place - make *sure* you are *not* using the filtering plugin that comes stock with SM; it i

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Lesli, On Monday, November 15, 2004, Lesli St. Clair wrote... > I've been struggling with SquirrelMail for two months. At about 300 > users, the CPU is maxed out and the load average on a dual-Ghz CPU Sun > machine climbs into the 80s. [..] I've been reading most of this thread over, and f

[SM-USERS] TRASH & purge button

2004-11-16 Thread Norrin Radd
Next to our "Trash" folder a "purge" button appears.  Where would I find the code for this?   Has anyone created subfolders in the "TRASH" folder and put purge buttons by those?   Thanks,   os=rh9 sm = 1.4.3a imap = courier mysql Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! – Get yours free!

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread John Madden
> When a visitor sucessfully logs in SM causes the IMAP server to do a lot > of work. Fist is last to parse the inbox for message and get the first > pages worth. At the same time it has to parse all the folders to check > for unread message in the folders so it can make us the side display. > Non

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread John Madden
> Getting even more OT, but I'm curious, John, to hear how you have > architected your machines. Please do divulge. Do you actually run SM > on more than one box? If so, how do you share sessions? Data/attach > dirs? NFS? Do you have a 'real' load balancer? etc... We use LVS to load balance

[SM-USERS] Email address validation?

2004-11-16 Thread Kirsten Chevalier
Hi, Is there a plugin or another SquirrelMail feature to allow for email address validation? That is, when a user types in an email address when composing a message in SquirrelMail, I want them to get a popup or message warning them if they type in a syntactically incorrect email address. Thanks,

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread William R. Mussatto
John Madden said: >> So the load problem is caused by whatever SM does at login--the first >> mail pull? caching? sorting? > > And PHP session creation. Not to beat the already-mamed horse, but have > you tried out the database-based sessions yet? > > John > > > > > -- > John Madden > UNIX Systems

RE: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread Viren Patel
I have been following this thread with great interest. Here are my 4 cents. We have a webmail setup as follows: Dual AMD Athlon MP 2400 w/ 1 GB RAM RAID 5 (3 ATA133 7200 RPM disks with 8MB cache) Adaptec 2400 ATA RAID controller Linksys Gigabit NIC (gigabit uplink to router ;-)) Fr

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread p dont think
Getting even more OT, but I'm curious, John, to hear how you have architected your machines. Please do divulge. Do you actually run SM on more than one box? If so, how do you share sessions? Data/attach dirs? NFS? Do you have a 'real' load balancer? etc... --

Re: [OT] Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread p dont think
- Turck MMCache is insanely faster than PHP Accelerator (PHP-A), if that's what you had been using: http://turck-mmcache.sourceforge.net/index_old.html Intriguing ... Would you not agree that "insanely" is overselling its performance over PHP-A? Reading the stats on that page I come up with a ~mar

Re: [SM-USERS] "To Do" Button Color?

2004-11-16 Thread p dont think
Default (dark blue) is hard to read ... is there an option to change the button color(s)? What button? Please put subject of your inquiry in the body of your message. Furthermore, I have no idea what the "To Do" button is. Perhaps it belongs to one of the TODO plugins? If so, post to the plu

Re: [SM-USERS] Problems sending mail from Squirrelmail

2004-11-16 Thread p dont think
I have squirrelmail installed and it functions (almost) perfectly however when I go to 'compose' and fill in my message fields as required and then click send the page waits for a second or two and then returns me to the 'now blank' compose page. Needless to say the e-mail is not sent and nothing

RE: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread John Madden
> I think you may need to dig deeper into the whole authentication > process, but I don't think that SM is the bad guy here. I think your > issue is between IMAP and LDAP. I disagree. That IMAP/LDAP work happens *every time a user clicks,* not just on the initial login. Something else is going o

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread John Madden
> So the load problem is caused by whatever SM does at login--the first > mail pull? caching? sorting? And PHP session creation. Not to beat the already-mamed horse, but have you tried out the database-based sessions yet? John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMA

Re: [SM-USERS] Problems sending mail from Squirrelmail

2004-11-16 Thread Caleb Phillips
however when I go to 'compose' and fill in my message fields as required and then click send the page waits for a second or two and then returns me to the 'now blank' compose page. My setup. SMTP Server: ESMTP Postfix (Snapshot-20011125) IMAP Server: uw IMAP4rev1 2000.283rh In a production enviro

RE: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread Peter P. Benac
Who else uses LDAP for authentication? If I am not mistaken authentication is handled between SM and whatever IMAP server you are using and then between IMAP and LDAP. My users authenticate to Cyrus IMAP through SASL. SM sole function here is to hand off the credentials to the IMAP server and w

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelspell

2004-11-16 Thread Norrin Radd
1. Manually install aspell for perl. perl -MCPAN -e'CPAN::Shell->install("Text::Aspell")'     You need ExecCGI option for scripts in www document directories, notonly in cgi-bin directory. you need 'AddHandler cgi-script .cgi' directive in apache configs in order to use that cgi script without movi

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread Lesli St. Clair
Peter P. Benac wrote: Sorry for picking this thread up late, but I was curious if you have run any performance monitoring tools on this box or are you just assuming the SM is the culprit. At the very least have you run and monitored TOP on this machine to see who your top processes are. I'm using

RE: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread Peter P. Benac
Sorry for picking this thread up late, but I was curious if you have run any performance monitoring tools on this box or are you just assuming the SM is the culprit. At the very least have you run and monitored TOP on this machine to see who your top processes are. My mail server is on a E-220-R d

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread Lesli St. Clair
Thanks, but we use ldap (on another box) for logins. SqM wrote: I ran into something similar with high load on a web server hosting homepages.. Load in the 40's.. If you have the user data base in NIS.. (i.e. passwd) Make sure that you do not have it in the password file as well.. Or.. Make sure th

[OT] Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread Joe
p dont think said: > Just skimmed this thread and have two thoughts: > > > - Turck MMCache is insanely faster than PHP Accelerator (PHP-A), if > that's what you had been using: > http://turck-mmcache.sourceforge.net/index_old.html Intriguing ... Would you not agree that "insanely" is overselling

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread SqM
I ran into something similar with high load on a web server hosting homepages.. Load in the 40's.. If you have the user data base in NIS.. (i.e. passwd) Make sure that you do not have it in the password file as well.. Or.. Make sure that the search order is NIS -> PASSWD file If the password fil

[SM-USERS] "To Do" Button Color?

2004-11-16 Thread TOM JENKINS
Default (dark blue) is hard to read ... is there an option to change the button color(s)? --Tom Text Signature --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robu

[SM-USERS] Problems sending mail from Squirrelmail

2004-11-16 Thread Brett Carr
My Problem: I have squirrelmail installed and it functions (almost) perfectly however when I go to 'compose' and fill in my message fields as required and then click send the page waits for a second or two and then returns me to the 'now blank' compose page. Needless to say the e-mail is not sen

Re: [SM-USERS] get rid of "Sign out" and "Squirrelmail" hyperlink

2004-11-16 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Hi, > > I want to get rid of "Sign out" and "Squirrelmail" hyperlink.And look for > the codes,but still not find the answer.Can anyone tell me which file is > the > one I could modify. modify squirrelmail configuration file. start conf.pl go to 1. Organization Preferences and set 5. Signout

Re: [SM-USERS] get rid of "Sign out" and "Squirrelmail" hyperlink

2004-11-16 Thread p dont think
I want to get rid of "Sign out" and "Squirrelmail" hyperlink.And look for the codes,but still not find the answer.Can anyone tell me which file is the one I could modify. You'll need to comment out the sign out link by hacking the source in functions/page_header.php around line 270. Take the Squi

[SM-USERS] get rid of "Sign out" and "Squirrelmail" hyperlink

2004-11-16 Thread masaki
Hi, I want to get rid of "Sign out" and "Squirrelmail" hyperlink.And look for the codes,but still not find the answer.Can anyone tell me which file is the one I could modify. Thanks --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE

Re: [SM-USERS] Giving up on SM because of CPU and load issues

2004-11-16 Thread p dont think
Just skimmed this thread and have two thoughts: - Turck MMCache is insanely faster than PHP Accelerator (PHP-A), if that's what you had been using: http://turck-mmcache.sourceforge.net/index_old.html - SM 1.5.1 has better header caching mechanisms that might lighten the load a bit ---

Re: [SM-USERS] SM on Safari

2004-11-16 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Can anyone point me towards a previous thread or FAQ regarding > Squirrelmail's incompatibility with the Safari browser? Is this > something that's being looked at still, or has Safari just been written > off as a lost cause and not something that Squirrelmail is going to ever > be possible to u

Re: [SM-USERS] SM on Safari

2004-11-16 Thread Rich Hall
Daniel M. Drucker reportedly babbled: > Can anyone point me towards a previous thread or FAQ regarding > Squirrelmail's incompatibility with the Safari browser? Is this > something that's being looked at still, or has Safari just been written > off as a lost cause and not something that Squirrelma