> I subscribe to the squirrelmail-users mailing list.
> [ ] True - No need to CC me when replying
> [X] False - Please CC me when replying
>
> This bug occurs when I ...
> Try to manipulate messages from the mailbox view using the checkboxes.
>
>
>
> The description of the bug:
> I am run
I subscribe to the squirrelmail-users mailing list.
[ ] True - No need to CC me when replying
[X] False - Please CC me when replying
This bug occurs when I ...
Try to manipulate messages from the mailbox view using the checkboxes.
The description of the bug:
I am running SM behind a p
This is sendmail, logging it's encrypted TLS conections to other
relays/clients. verify=FAIL just refers to not being able to verify the
certificate used by the other end.
Ean Kingston wrote:
Jose Meza wrote:
Hi, i need some help, my server's logwatch says something like this
every day, I'm not
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, John Madden wrote:
> > That surprises me. We aren't a Linux shop--yet--and I'm not sure I'm
> > willing to start setting up Linux boxes will-nilly for this. I'm curious
> > why Intel would be better than sparc, though.
>
> Try it out on a [higher-end] Desktop PC -- the per
Lesli St. Clair said:
> I can put it on a dual or quad CPU sun box, with plenty of RAM. I have
used both PHP acceleration and the IMAP proxy. On my current system,
users login about every 12 seconds, on average, during busy periods. We
use iPlanet 5.2 for IMAP (which does not do server side sorting
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:05:55 -0500, Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not a larger percentage, no.
>
> I just did an experiment with the load testing software.
>
> I had it run a 500-user session with users logging in 5 seconds apart.
> The 4-CPU machine didn't go crazy--but the CPU wa
Not a larger percentage, no.
I just did an experiment with the load testing software.
I had it run a 500-user session with users logging in 5 seconds apart.
The 4-CPU machine didn't go crazy--but the CPU was used up pretty well
and the LA hit about 8-12.
Then I changed the parameters to 500 user
Always from source! And yes, fresh php, too. It was an untouched machine
that hadn't been used for anything else.
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I thought of that, but I tried a fresh install of apache 2.x
From source?
What about PHP?
begin:vcard
fn:Lesli St. Cl
>> Can anyone point me towards a previous thread or FAQ regarding
>> Squirrelmail's incompatibility with the Safari browser? Is this
>> something that's being looked at still, or has Safari just been written
> off as a lost cause and not something that Squirrelmail is going to ever
> be possible t
> Can anyone point me towards a previous thread or FAQ regarding
> Squirrelmail's incompatibility with the Safari browser? Is this
> something that's being looked at still, or has Safari just been written
off as a lost cause and not something that Squirrelmail is going to ever
be possible to use wi
* Daniel M. Drucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Can anyone point me towards a previous thread or FAQ regarding
> Squirrelmail's incompatibility with the Safari browser? Is this
> something that's being looked at still, or has Safari just been
> written off as a lost cause and not something that Squir
Can anyone point me towards a previous thread or FAQ regarding
Squirrelmail's incompatibility with the Safari browser? Is this
something that's being looked at still, or has Safari just been written
off as a lost cause and not something that Squirrelmail is going to ever
be possible to use with
> Just as an example: I'm simulating 500 users on this 4-CPU sparc. Here's
> the top output:
> 166 processes: 159 sleeping, 3 running, 4 on cpu
> CPU states: 12.7% idle, 82.7% user, 4.7% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0%
What does it look like if you simulate, say, 10 users? Do your httpd's
end up co
* Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I thought of that, but I tried a fresh install of apache 2.x
>From source?
What about PHP?
--
_
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
_
Ralf Hildebrandt
I thought of that, but I tried a fresh install of apache 2.x and the
beta of the next release of SM, and saw the same thing, at least insofar
as apache using more than its share of the cpu. Really, this whole thing
is bizarre! I have an identical model machine running as a spamtrap/AV
machine,
* Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fresh install of apache 1.3x, SM, and mysql, but the same revs etc.
Maybe a bug in the software? I've seen that on RH systems -- apache
starts hogging the cpu.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmed
> It doesn't happen with iPlanet's built in webmail, but we wanted
> something with more features. Also, I wanted something that didn't need
> to be rebranded everytime I apply an email system hotfix. That's the
> downside of all-in-one solutions like iPlanet/SunOne.
Yeah. AFAIK, iplanet's client
Fresh install of apache 1.3x, SM, and mysql, but the same revs etc.
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was absolutely convinced that something was misconfigured when I saw
the LA over 80. So I moved it to anther, identical machine and got the
same thing. Then I moved
* Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was absolutely convinced that something was misconfigured when I saw
> the LA over 80. So I moved it to anther, identical machine and got the
> same thing. Then I moved it to the 4-CPU monster.
Installed with the same software?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.
I have been pointed into the direction of this plugin:
http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=109.
Is there any other way of accomplishing distribution
lists than this MySql backend database?
The latest group plugin works with plain ascii files as well.
--
Regards
Frank S. Bernhardt
I was absolutely convinced that something was misconfigured when I saw
the LA over 80. So I moved it to anther, identical machine and got the
same thing. Then I moved it to the 4-CPU monster.
The ONLY problem was CPU. RAM, swap, disk I/O all were taking a nap.
Ken Brush wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 200
Jose Meza wrote:
Hi, i need some help, my server's logwatch says something like this
every day, I'm not quite sure about what does it mean, can anybody help
me?
**Unmatched Entries**
STARTTLS=client, relay=michell.com.pe., version=TLSv1/SSLv3,
verify=FAIL, cipher=AES256-SHA, bits=256/256: 37 T
> That surprises me. We aren't a Linux shop--yet--and I'm not sure I'm
> willing to start setting up Linux boxes will-nilly for this. I'm curious
> why Intel would be better than sparc, though.
Try it out on a [higher-end] Desktop PC -- the performance may change your
mind. Sun is hyping Solaris
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Friday 12 November 2004 12:53 pm, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>
Did I mention that it's all IBM x series eServer hardware? Or that there
are 5 servers? Or that the backbone is fiber? or that the whole thing is
administered via remote (secure) Internet ssh? Who the heck cares?
5
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:21:56 -0500, Lesli St. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I've been struggling with SquirrelMail for two months. At about 300
> users, the CPU is maxed out and the load average on a dual-Ghz CPU Sun
> machine climbs into the 80s. I moved it to a larger, 4-processor
John Madden wrote:
First off, I'd recommend not using Sun hardware for this sort of thing -
mid-range intels will blow the doors of of sparcs for this sort of
processing. Secondly, we have to consider how this load testing software
works -- what, exactly, is it doing within SM? We support about
I suspect it is the SM/iPlanet combo. But I can't change our email
infrastructure just for a webmail interface. I'm disappointed, because I
do like SM.
Norrin Radd wrote:
Lesli st. Clair,
Sorry to hear about your pain and suffering. Although
I have only fractions of expertise of the much more
qu
Lesli st. Clair,
Sorry to hear about your pain and suffering. Although
I have only fractions of expertise of the much more
qualified people on this list and My load is only
about half of yours, are you married to iPlanet IMAP?
I use Courier and it seems to be holding up nicely,
although we only h
Hi All,
I've been struggling with SquirrelMail for two months. At about 300
users, the CPU is maxed out and the load average on a dual-Ghz CPU Sun
machine climbs into the 80s. I moved it to a larger, 4-processor box and
did load testing with software. It appears that the 4 processor machine
wou
>> You need to either tell postfix to relay all mail from the web server's
>> IP
>> address (or localhost if it's the same machine) or configure
>> SquirrelMail
>> to use authentication.
>>
>>
>>
> I have postfix 'mynetworks' setting = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.1.5.81/24
> I've confirmed the IP address (pri
> I too have the same problem. squirrelspell does
not
> work for HTML in 1.4.3a. Where can I download the
> older version of squirrelspell? I cannot find it
on
> the plugin page.
please provide more details about your problem.
You can get squirrel
Hi, i need some help, my server's logwatch says something like this
every day, I'm not quite sure about what does it mean, can anybody help
me?
**Unmatched Entries**
STARTTLS=client, relay=michell.com.pe., version=TLSv1/SSLv3,
verify=FAIL, cipher=AES256-SHA, bits=256/256: 37 Time(s)
DSN:
>
>>
>> --- Tomas Kuliavas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > Kalin,
>>> >
>>> > I too have the same problem. squirrelspell does
>>> not
>>> > work for HTML in 1.4.3a. Where can I download the
>>> > older version of squirrelspell? I cannot find it
>>> on
>>> > the plugin page.
>>>
>>> pl
> I have a need for users to setup distribution lists.
>
> I have been pointed into the direction of this plugin:
> http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=109.
>
> Is there any other way of accomplishing distribution
> lists than this MySql backend database?
The right ways:
* http://www.l
>>>
>> what about this?
>>
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
>> reject_rbl_client relays.ordb.org,
>> reject_rhsbl_senderdsn.rfc-ignorant.org
>> reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
>> reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
>> reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
>>
>
> --- Tomas Kuliavas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > Kalin,
>> >
>> > I too have the same problem. squirrelspell does
>> not
>> > work for HTML in 1.4.3a. Where can I download the
>> > older version of squirrelspell? I cannot find it
>> on
>> > the plugin page.
>>
>> please provide more
36 matches
Mail list logo
