Re: [SM-USERS] Lack of X-Mailer adding to possible spam score ?

2004-05-20 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Some of my mail to a client is bouncing back due to being incorrectly > tagged as spam. One of my messages made it through, but their system > marked it as "suspected spam". I've pasted, below, the spam scoring their > server assigned to my message. > > My message was sent from SquirrelMail. I se

[SM-USERS] Re: cannot upload attachments (no luck with FAQ)

2004-05-20 Thread Dirk Rösler
Hello, I am have the same problem here, with a recent install SquirrelMail version 1.4.3-RC1 on Red Hat 9. I have checked permissions and php.ini, also setting to /tmp and chmod 777 but the error will not go away. From the apache error_log: [Fri May 21 13:19:52 2004] [error] PHP Warning: File

Re: [SM-USERS] Trying to contain SM within https

2004-05-20 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Louis Li wrote: > Try removing the slash after the DocumentRoot > >> >> >># General setup for the virtual host >>DocumentRoot "/var/www/localhost/htdocs/webmail/" >>ServerName postal..com >>ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>ErrorLog logs/ssl-error_log >>TransferLog logs/ssl-access_log >> I tr

Re: [SM-USERS] Trying to contain SM within https

2004-05-20 Thread Louis Li
Try removing the slash after the DocumentRoot Jonathan Nichols 提到: > Yes, I've Googled. Yes, I've checked the FAQ. I even searched gmane > for a while. > > I'm having trouble containing SM within https. What I'm trying to do > should be fairly simple. > > Here's the relevant portions of ssl.defau

[SM-USERS] Trying to contain SM within https

2004-05-20 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Yes, I've Googled. Yes, I've checked the FAQ. I even searched gmane for a while. I'm having trouble containing SM within https. What I'm trying to do should be fairly simple. Here's the relevant portions of ssl.default-vhost.conf: SSLEngine off ## ## SSL Virtual Host Context ## # General

[SM-USERS] Problems with 1.5.0 and Courier

2004-05-20 Thread Paco Hope
I'm using: FreeBSD 5.2.1 SQM 1.5.0 Courier IMAP 2.2.0 Sendmail with procmail for local delivery (to do Maildir) Everything sorta works, except I can't read my mail. Small problem. :) I can navigate folders, create folders, see messages and all that fun stuff. When new mail comes in, it shows up

[SM-USERS] Re: [Fwd: squirrelmail-users digest, Vol 1 #2084 - 13 msgs]

2004-05-20 Thread Alan in Toronto
Brian DeRosa said: > Alan, > While I believe this isn't a squirrelmail-related question at heart, Mostly not, except for the issue of the X-Mailer header. > I'll try to throw some advice your way. 8) Thanks. > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you're running a local SMTP > server whi

[SM-USERS] [Fwd: squirrelmail-users digest, Vol 1 #2084 - 13 msgs]

2004-05-20 Thread Brian DeRosa
Alan, While I believe this isn't a squirrelmail-related question at heart, I'll try to throw some advice your way. 8) Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you're running a local SMTP server which delivers mail once you dial-up/connect, correct? Many places will bounce mail that originates

Re: [SM-USERS] help with hardware specs...

2004-05-20 Thread Ricardo Stella
Thanks for the tips... I should have clarified IMAP. It won't be hosted on the box (that's why imapproxy), so I don't think HD sizes should be an issue. Imap servers (3 of them actually) are AHEM... PMDF on VMS boxes. (You can tell that it's not my call, right ?) Most users are students (5000

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Reverse on email address not working in Squirrelmail

2004-05-20 Thread p dont think
Thanks everyone for the help on this issue. I have since installed qmail on my test enviroment and everything is working perfectly. I can now add virtual domains and accounts with ease. I guess the next step is to install courier-imap so I can run squirremail. Quick question on that, due to not ha

Re: [SM-USERS] help with hardware specs...

2004-05-20 Thread p dont think
2x 80GB SATA (HW Raid 1) Drives are cheap these days; I might even go bigger. SW: RedHat 3 AS Apache 1.3x (mod-ssl) PHP 4.3.6 (mod-php instead of cgi) Turck MMCache UP-imapproxy (3 instances) SM 1.4.2 What IMAP? Use SM 1.4.3. It is very stable (and already at the RC stage). Plugins: spell, multilo

[SM-USERS] Lack of X-Mailer adding to possible spam score ?

2004-05-20 Thread Alan in Toronto
Some of my mail to a client is bouncing back due to being incorrectly tagged as spam. One of my messages made it through, but their system marked it as "suspected spam". I've pasted, below, the spam scoring their server assigned to my message. My message was sent from SquirrelMail. I see it object

[SM-USERS] Re: Reverse on email address not working in Squirrelmail

2004-05-20 Thread rbartlett
Thanks everyone for the help on this issue. I have since installed qmail on my test enviroment and everything is working perfectly. I can now add virtual domains and accounts with ease. I guess the next step is to install courier-imap so I can run squirremail. Quick question on that, due to not ha

Re: [SM-USERS] help with hardware specs...

2004-05-20 Thread Alan in Toronto
Ricardo Stella said: > > Searching the archives, did not find much help, so I figured I ask... > > I'm looking at setting up a SM box as follows: > > HW: > Pentium 4 - 3.4 GHZ, 800 MHZ FSB > 4 GB DDR 400 Mhz > 2x 80GB SATA (HW Raid 1) FWIW, your box is more powerful than what my web host uses, and

Re: [SM-USERS] help with hardware specs...

2004-05-20 Thread Alan in Toronto
Jay Lee said: > Ditch UW IMAP as fast as you can > unless you absolutely need it for backwards compat. I've seen debating opinions about UWIMAP. Some say that as long as it's set up well, that it works well. My host uses UWIMAP, therefore that's what I must use with SquirrelMail, and it seems to

Re: [SM-USERS] help with hardware specs...

2004-05-20 Thread Alan in Toronto
Ricardo Stella said: > > Searching the archives, did not find much help, so I figured I ask... > > I'm looking at setting up a SM box as follows: > > HW: > Pentium 4 - 3.4 GHZ, 800 MHZ FSB > 4 GB DDR 400 Mhz > 2x 80GB SATA (HW Raid 1) FWIW, your box is more powerful than what my web host uses, and

Re: [SM-USERS] help with hardware specs...

2004-05-20 Thread Jay Lee
Also, Consider going with two low end Xeons rather than the fastest (and most expensive) Pentium 4. Dual 2.6ghz Xeons should outperform a single 3.4ghz P4. It'll also be much more efficient running multiple tasks (IMAP, HTTP, etc). Actually, what I'd really recommend is a Dual Opteron runn

Re: [SM-USERS] help with hardware specs...

2004-05-20 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > Searching the archives, did not find much help, so I figured I ask... > > I'm looking at setting up a SM box as follows: > > HW: > Pentium 4 - 3.4 GHZ, 800 MHZ FSB > 4 GB DDR 400 Mhz > 2x 80GB SATA (HW Raid 1) > > SW: > RedHat 3 AS > Apache 1.3x (m

[SM-USERS] help with hardware specs...

2004-05-20 Thread Ricardo Stella
Searching the archives, did not find much help, so I figured I ask... I'm looking at setting up a SM box as follows: HW: Pentium 4 - 3.4 GHZ, 800 MHZ FSB 4 GB DDR 400 Mhz 2x 80GB SATA (HW Raid 1) SW: RedHat 3 AS Apache 1.3x (mod-ssl) PHP 4.3.6 (mod-php instead of cgi) Turck MMCache UP-imapproxy

Re: [SM-USERS] (no subject)

2004-05-20 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> PLEASE STOP SENDING ME ALL THIS STUFF. TAKE ME OFF YOUR EMAIL LIST. > > > --- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll g

Re: [SM-USERS] (no subject)

2004-05-20 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > PLEASE STOP SENDING ME ALL THIS STUFF. TAKE ME OFF YOUR EMAIL LIST. > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users > --- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get

[SM-USERS] (no subject)

2004-05-20 Thread maria
PLEASE STOP SENDING ME ALL THIS STUFF. TAKE ME OFF YOUR EMAIL LIST. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the