[SM-USERS] Fw: Multiple Emails in To Field bouce mails when send via 1.4.1 version

2003-12-31 Thread sin dac
  I have problem with 1.4.1 version of sm.   when i compose message with about 100 mail address in TO field OR BCC OR CC fields mails are getting bouce due to  adding < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> a space before mail starts.   can anyone help ?   This is bounced mail shows      - The following a

[SM-USERS] Multiple Emails in To Field bouce mails when send via 1.4.1 version

2003-12-31 Thread sin dac
I have problem with 1.4.1 version of sm.   when i compose message with about 100 mail address in TO field OR BCC OR CC fields mails are getting bouce due to  adding < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> a space before mail starts.   can anyone help ?    

Re: [SM-USERS] [newbie] Sent email status

2003-12-31 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Wednesday, December 31, 2003, p dont think wrote... >>> The only place you should see that in stock SM is when using >>> compose_in_new_window functionality IIRC. >> Erm... okay, it's in the development version, not the stable >> version. Thijs? Why isn't it in both? Didn't Thijs put it in? >

Re: [SM-USERS] fsockopen(): SSL operation failed

2003-12-31 Thread Jerry Westrick
Hello all... In the mean time I've gotten SM to run on SuSE 9.0 Just in case anyone is interested, here is an excerpt of my installation document showing how to get SM running on SuSE9.0: Install Squirrelmail software Yast->Software->Install and remove Software * Search: Squir clic

Re: [SM-USERS] Remove the domain from login page

2003-12-31 Thread Ricardo Kleemann
Hi, What about the ability to separate the username and the mailserver into 2 separate entries, how would I change that? - Original Message Follows - > > They can,...depends on your implementation,...my server > hosts only one domain, so we just use username. On > servers which host m

Re: [SM-USERS] Remove the domain from login page

2003-12-31 Thread Chris Hilts
>>I wonder if there's anyway that in SM pleople login as "user" >>instead of "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". There are a couple plugins that will automatically append the domain name, so instead of typing "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" you can just type "user". You may want to look especially at the vlogin plugin. --

Re: [SM-USERS] Remove the domain from login page

2003-12-31 Thread Jeff Mao
They can,...depends on your implementation,...my server hosts only one domain, so we just use username. On servers which host multiple domains, I believe the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a necessity to prevent account confusion. Jeff At 6:43 PM -0500 12/31/03, Jorge Cornejo wrote: I wonder if there's

[SM-USERS] Remove the domain from login page

2003-12-31 Thread Jorge Cornejo
I wonder if there's anyway that in SM pleople login as "user" instead of "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". -- Jorge Cornejo Movil: +511-9855-4655 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your ski

Re: [SM-USERS] [newbie] Sent email status

2003-12-31 Thread p dont think
> Hello P, > On Wednesday, December 31, 2003, p dont think wrote... > >>> If the email wasn't sent successfully, you get the error message, >>> otherwise you get the main page. I believe at least 1.4.3[cvs] has >>> a message displayed saying that the message was sent now, possibly >>> 1.4.2. > >> T

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail and php safe_mode

2003-12-31 Thread Pierre-Luc Drouin
Both data/ and default_pref are owned by the apache user, they are both readable by this user and the directory is executable by this user. I don't see errors about this in my apache error log file. What could be wrong? From: Jonathan Angliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pierre-Luc Drouin" <[EMAIL P

Re: [SM-USERS] [newbie] Sent email status

2003-12-31 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello P, On Wednesday, December 31, 2003, p dont think wrote... >> If the email wasn't sent successfully, you get the error message, >> otherwise you get the main page. I believe at least 1.4.3[cvs] has >> a message displayed saying that the message was sent now, possibly >> 1.4.2. > The only pla

Re: [SM-USERS] [newbie] Sent email status

2003-12-31 Thread p dont think
> Hello Manu, > On Wednesday, December 31, 2003, Manu C S wrote... > >> We've just started using squirrelmail (1.2.10) in our organization >> and I'm pleased to report that we have many happy users. :-) > > 1.2.10? Did you install it? Why didn't you go with 1.4.2? Yah, 1.2.10 has security issues,

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail and php safe_mode

2003-12-31 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Pierre-luc, On Wednesday, December 31, 2003, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote... > I`m running Squirrelmail on a machine running mod_php4-4.3.4 and > apache-2.0.48. It works perfectly when safe_mode is disabled but it > fails when I enable it. I get the following error message: > Error opening ../da

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail and php safe_mode

2003-12-31 Thread Pierre-Luc Drouin
Hello,   I`m running Squirrelmail on a machine running mod_php4-4.3.4 and apache-2.0.48. It works perfectly when safe_mode is disabled but it fails when I enable it. I get the following error message:   Error opening ../data/default_prefDefault preference file not found or not readable!Please conta

Re: [SM-USERS] Email rejected by Spamhaus

2003-12-31 Thread Dwight Tovey
Jonathan Angliss said: > Hello Squirrelmail, > On Wednesday, December 31, 2003, SquirrelMail wrote... > >> This is the strangest thing. If I use SquirrelMail to send >> an email to my mother, I get it returned saying > >> <[edited [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host nycmx03.mgw.rr.com[24.29.102.163] said: >

Re: [SM-USERS] SM under Fedora

2003-12-31 Thread Betialai
Dear Chris, I'm sure I'm asking the right people at the wrong forum :-) You are right, I'd like some hints about how to access my Cyrus IMAP server under Fedora so that I can start configuring the accounts, adding the users and so on. It's not an SM question at all --- Chris Hilts <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [SM-USERS] Email rejected by Spamhaus

2003-12-31 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Squirrelmail, On Wednesday, December 31, 2003, SquirrelMail wrote... > This is the strangest thing. If I use SquirrelMail to send > an email to my mother, I get it returned saying > <[edited [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host nycmx03.mgw.rr.com[24.29.102.163] said: > 553 5.3.0 Mail from 66.152.97.23

Re: [SM-USERS] Why can't squirrelmail read root's mailbox

2003-12-31 Thread technical
I see your point. I am newbie but I can see why I wouldn't want to IMAP with the credential of account with such privilages as root. How do I alias and us that to IMAP in to root's mailbox. Happy new year On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, technical wrote: > >> >> Thank you. I read the article. It states "

[SM-USERS] Email rejected by Spamhaus

2003-12-31 Thread SquirrelMail
This is the strangest thing. If I use SquirrelMail to send an email to my mother, I get it returned saying <[edited [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host nycmx03.mgw.rr.com[24.29.102.163] said: 553 5.3.0 Mail from 66.152.97.230 rejected, see http://spamhaus.org/sbl (in reply to MAIL FROM command) Spamhaus ap

Re: [SM-USERS] Deleting Msg and Emptying Trash errors

2003-12-31 Thread Rafael Garay
FYI: This problem also occurs when sending a message with SM. After I send a message instead of refreshing back to the appropriate page I am sent to an Internet Explorer "Page Cannot Be Displayed" page. BUT the email actually gets sent successfully. I simply have to click on the Inbox Folder in the

Re: [SM-USERS] Deleting Msg and Emptying Trash errors

2003-12-31 Thread Rafael Garay
I'm still experiencing this problem with SM. Webhost still insisting it is not an issue on their end. Can someone tell me what PHP command (if any) instructs SM to go back to the message list after deleting a message from the read body view? Perhaps that same PHP command that is used when instructi

[SM-USERS] Reply buttons stopped working

2003-12-31 Thread Colin Cape
I upgraded from Windows 98 to Windows 2000 Pro and the Reply buttons no longer work in SquirrelMail. Everything else seems fine. We use V1.4.0   Colin Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now

Re: [SM-USERS] fetchmail and squirrelmail

2003-12-31 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Seth, On Tuesday, December 30, 2003, Seth Rothenberg wrote... > POP3 does not seem to support recursive downloads, but I developed a > method of moving one folder at a time, and now I have all my old > mail on my home server. I thought fetchmail supported IMAP? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL

Re: [SM-USERS] [newbie] Sent email status

2003-12-31 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Manu, On Wednesday, December 31, 2003, Manu C S wrote... > We've just started using squirrelmail (1.2.10) in our organization > and I'm pleased to report that we have many happy users. :-) 1.2.10? Did you install it? Why didn't you go with 1.4.2? > A common requirement from many of our use

Re: [SM-USERS] Subfolders no longer visible

2003-12-31 Thread Lee Hoffner
I fixed it. I had to manually edit ~/.mailboxlist. Though why these folders weren't visible to subscribe to I don't understand: SM is configured for the proper IMAP server (UW). --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Becom