[SM-USERS] User settings and multiple logins

Hey - I've discovered some weird behaviour in my Squirrelmail installation. When a users tries to login to Squirrelmail on a machine/browser that allready has another Squirrelmail users logged into the same system, this login succeds. The allready logged-in session now becomes a session of the new

RE: [SM-USERS] disappearing options

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, p dont think wrote: > > if (isset($plugins) && is_array($plugins)) { > > foreach ($plugins as $name) { > > print "$name\n"; > > use_plugin($name); > > } > > } > > > > I see both squirrelspell and newmail listed when I do that. Is there > > anything else I can

[SM-USERS] Problems with Confirmation on read

When someone confirms the read of a message, the confirmation that arrives to the user that sent the original message has no sender address, I am using the version 1.4.1 Thanks, Carlos Pedezert. División Informática Intendencia Municipal de Rivera Tel.: 062 - 34940 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -

[SM-USERS] Re: SquirrelMail does not immediately update mail folders when changes occur...

On Do 09 Okt 2003 11:27:17p Mark Knipfer wrote: > SquirrelMail does not always update the mail folder status. Hi, try this plugin: http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=64 Greetings, Bernd --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.

[SM-USERS] (no subject)

Der Squirrelmail: I am a user of Squirrelmail. I recently received a message that my mail was refused by another service provider (Road Runner). I need to know who my provider is and if my email is being detected as spam. How can I get help with this issue. I am obviously unaware and somewhat u

[SM-USERS] dovecot and filters

Hello. I'm having a bad day. First I ran up2date (redhat 7.3) on mysql and now bayesspam isn't working... but that's not the important thing right now. I'm trying to upgrade to squirrelmail to 1.4.2 from 1.2.11. It worked wonderfully for me, but then several people were having trouble with thi

Re: [SM-USERS] Too much noise.

Hello Brian, On Friday, October 10, 2003, Brian S. Bergin wrote... > Now perhaps a nntp group like comp.dcom.sys.cisco might be an idea > or comp.protocols.dns.bind where they also keep an archive at > isc.org.  If find both of those useful and they're frequented by > experts and novices alike. E

Re: [SM-USERS] Too much noise.

Hello Caleb, On Friday, October 10, 2003, Caleb Phillips wrote... > All I really want is my squirrel-mail t-shirt. After reading > thousands of 'noisy' emails, responding to my share, and patiently > waiting through change in command - I think I have deserved the > right to throw money at a good p

Re: [SM-USERS] Too much noise.

At 19:07 10 10 03 Friday, you wrote: that may be. however, breaking out the list with finer granularity. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem with lists broken is experienced users wouldn't subscribe to any except perhaps upgrade-problems so none would benefit from o

Re: [SM-USERS] Too much noise.

that may be. however, breaking out the list with finer granularity. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] If categories were divided in this manner, the only people who would read the upgrade-problems list and the newusers list would be newusers and people with upgrade problems

[SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.2.11 redirect.php, what does this do?

In SquirrelMail 1.2.11, what does redirect.php do? Would redirect.php cause any login problems to SquirrelMail using Internet Explorer 6 SP1 in Windows 98 and/or Windows XP? We have some customers having problems with users logging into SquirrelMail 1.2.11 where they are seeing redirect.php app

[SM-USERS] unsubscribe

  >From: "Jonathan Angliss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "David Iyoha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: "William R. Mussatto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] time out >Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:51:05 -0500 (CDT) > >Hello David, >On Tuesday, October 07, 2003, David Iyoh

[SM-USERS] Attachment size

How do I adjust the size of the attachment that can be sent with squirrel mail?  Currently, attachments 1MB or more will not even make it past the Add button.   Thanks in advance.   ---Pete MasseInformation Systems SpecialistDepartment

Re: [SM-USERS] delete_move_next

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Hi, I just installed 1.4.2 with the delete_move_next plugin and I have > a few questions. > > 1. Why is this plugin in the "Obsolete Plugins" section if it still seems >to be active and useful? The plugin is in the obsolete section, because the downloadable form o

[SM-USERS] Best Spam Plugin

I have a single user complaining of excessive spam. What is the best user based spam prevention plugin for SM? Adam --- Adam Gerson Assistant Director of Technology Columbia Grammar and Prep School 212-749-6200 ex. 379/432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cgps.org -

[SM-USERS] Big problem with avelsieve 0.9.6 :-(

Hello I have a server running SM-1.2.11 with avelsieve version 0.9 and everything works perfect. Now I am testing SM-1.4.2 with avelsieve 0.9.6 before I set this in production and I have a big problem with avelsieve. When I open avelsieve, it gets my filters (created with SM-1.2.11/avelsieve0.