Re: [SM-USERS] Original msg format distorted in Reply

2003-09-20 Thread Michael Lai
Not trying to be an a** or anything but how am I suppose to show the distorted format of my "html" message if I don't send it in html? Does that not defeat the purpose of the posting if I send it in plain text? I'd really urge you to get an email client that can show html message. Bruce Richa

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelspell

2003-09-20 Thread whizkid
If this is a windows machine, shouldn't "'c:/php4/aspell -a'" really be "'c:\php4\aspell -a'" > On 20 Sep 2003 Lee Brink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > I have been looking around but I've not found anyplace where this is >> being >> > discussed. I can't get the plugin to run aspell at all, the

Re: [SM-USERS] Original msg format distorted in Reply

2003-09-20 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:44:33PM +0800, Michael Lai wrote: > > > > > > > > I have successfully installed squirrelmail 1.4.1 but I have a problem > with replying to emails, especially html emails.  In the compose text > box, the format of the original email would be all distorted.  For

RE: [SM-USERS] disappearing options

2003-09-20 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, p dont think wrote: > It is not clear if you are talking about the main options page or some > of the items on the display preferences page...? Main options page. The one that contains display prefs, personal info, spam cop, etc. The "disappearing options" are "new mail opt

RE: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-20 Thread rkl
What is the approximate date of availability for 1.5? -thanks >> > Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode? >> > >> > -rkl >> > >> >> It is in the works, a plugin was created but required a few core hacks > to >> get done. I have since rewritten the plugin and have the code to > submit >> to CVS to ge

Re: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-20 Thread rkl
That'll be great. Frame has its purpose but alot user preference is non-frame. thanks -rkl > rkl said: >> Just a real simple question. >> >> Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode? >> >> -rkl >> > > It is in the works, a plugin was created but required a few core hacks to > get done. I have since rew

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelspell

2003-09-20 Thread Thomas Stephenson
On 20 Sep 2003 Lee Brink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been looking around but I've not found anyplace where this is being > > discussed. I can't get the plugin to run aspell at all, the plugin runs > > but aspell does not. The only thing stated in INSTALL was that > > apsell must be the

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelspell

2003-09-20 Thread Lee Brink
> I have been looking around but I've not found anyplace where this is being > discussed. I can't get the plugin to run aspell at all, the plugin runs > but aspell does not. The only thing stated in INSTALL was that > apsell must be the the PHP path and I've installed it in c:\php4\aspell. If yo

Re: [SM-USERS] Original msg format distorted in Reply

2003-09-20 Thread Michael Lai
Thank you for the plugin.  Just wondering do I need to apply the patch again if I used the patch from the previous version? Thanks, Michael. p dont think wrote: Please install this newer version of the HTML Mail plugin, which should help solve that problem.  It won’t preserve H

RE: [SM-USERS] disappearing options

2003-09-20 Thread p dont think
> > On one account, when I go to "options", I see all the available options. > > If I sign out (same browser) and login as the other user, I find that > > "newmail" and "spellcheck" aren't listed under options. Looking at the > > userpref table, I don't see any prefs pertaining to what options to