[SM-USERS] Attachments problem

2003-07-23 Thread kalpesh
hi all i am using Redhat 7.2 and squirrelmail 1.4 I am facing one typical problem with attachmets. Some times SM didnt gives proper view of the attachemts files (like a junk file). When i click on downlaod it asks me to save the file but it saves the file in "untiteled2.mixed" format and not able t

[SM-USERS] Custom look/feel?

2003-07-23 Thread Michael Heth
I've been trying to get a handle on the amount of customization available for the interface prior to installing SM 1.4.1 on Mac OSX. From what I find it seems I can only fiddle with the fonts a bit via CSS. Is this true? If I want to host a number of domains on one SM installation, do all use

Re: [SM-USERS] right_main/mailbox_display bug?

2003-07-23 Thread David R.
> Do you have display_errors set to On in php.ini? > It might be that something is causing a PHP error but that it is not > printed. I will try to set that. I ended up pinpointing the error to one specific message that both I and he had received, that was fairly "complicated": It had a very long r

[SM-USERS] alot of problems with squirrelmail and debian.

2003-07-23 Thread Mauro
Hallo. I have a lot of problems with squirrelmail. I'm using debian woody. First I've installed squirrelmail version 1.2 that is included in woody. I know from this list that there is a bug in debian's distributed copy. So I download version 1.4 from unstable and I've installed it. I logged and see

[SM-USERS] MIME-handling problem with MS Outlook sent attachments (Try #2)

2003-07-23 Thread Vernyik, Zeno
Hi again! In case you would need some more information on the case, below you can find the headers of working and non-working versions of the same attachment. Thanks in advance for your help. Yours, Zeno The header of the "wrong" (not working) mail looks as follows: >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] M

Re: [SM-USERS] attachment limits

2003-07-23 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Matt, On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, Matt Ingram wrote... > here's another one for you... > I've got my max upload size to 10M, post size to 11M and memory size to 15M. > when I attach a file to an SM composition, it seems it wants to add > about 35% to the file size.. Base64 encoding... Wh

Re: [SM-USERS] Timeout issues...still

2003-07-23 Thread itsbruce
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:39:29AM -0400, Lee Brink wrote: > This has been driving the people who compose novels and call them email > messages here at Cornell. They take so long to compose their message, they > exceed this timeout, and SquirrelMail considers them logged off. To be fair, people so

Re: [SM-USERS] Timeout issues...still

2003-07-23 Thread Lee Brink
One thing that bit me in the butt for timeout issues was this directive in the php.ini file: session.gc_maxlifetime The default is 24 minutes. As I understand this directive, once you hit this timeout PHP treats the session as garbage and throws it all out, effectively logging you out. This has

squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net

2003-07-23 Thread Hans-Göran Puke
Hi, I am using SM 1.4.1 CVS-version.I have noticed the following oddity probably related to the Delete and next plugin: The messages are sorted with the newest ones on the top of the page. I click the first one, and go to the bottom of the page the link "Delete & Next" is active, but "Delete & Prev

Re: [SM-USERS] Folder limits and attachment limits

2003-07-23 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello Chris, > upload_max_filesize = 25M ; define the maximum allowed upload size > max_execution_time = 1000 ; set a decent maximum execution time to > ; allow long uploads or downloads > memory_limit = 35M; must be a size > UL size > post_max_size = 25M ;

Re: [SM-USERS] right_main/mailbox_display bug?

2003-07-23 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
> All of a sudden several of my users (including me) seem to have > encountered some kind of bug. When the right_main page comes up, it only > goes this far: > After that, there is nothing. This seems to be where Do you have display_errors set to On in php.ini? It might be that something is causin

Re: [SM-USERS] Question about delivery dates on messages

2003-07-23 Thread Jeremy Thompson
Tom Williams wrote: Jeremy Thompson wrote: Tom Williams wrote: Hi! Ok, I have two questions regarding delivery dates on messages: 1) Some messages sent from computers with a date set in the PAST are showing up as being delivered on a date in that year even though the message was sent recen