[SM-USERS] Praise & suggestion

2003-07-08 Thread Adam Bernstein
First wanted to say, this is the most amazingly supported software package I've ever seen, live-response-direct-from-the-developers-wise. I don't know how you guys are finding time to do any developing with all the questions you answer, all so fast. Second, I would humbly suggest a minor change:

Re: [SM-USERS] Slow behavior with no Internet connection

2003-07-08 Thread Jon Angliss
Hello Jason, On Tuesday, July 08, 2003, Jason Lieurance wrote... > Hello, > resolv.conf is: > nameserver 0.0.0.0 > Should this be 127.0.0.1, perhaps? Yes... that'd help I'd say. 0.0.0.0 has a special meaning if I remember correctly, but 127.0.0.1 would be a lot safer. -- Jon Angliss ([EM

Re: [SM-USERS] Login Problem

2003-07-08 Thread Jon Angliss
Hello Keith, On Tuesday, July 08, 2003, Keith Hatfull wrote... > I should also add: > Mercury/32 IMAP > As I said, all works swimmingly with 1.2.10...just can't get past the > login page with 1.4.1. Must be session related but heck if I can figure > it out. What is the exact error that you get

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.0 + multiple Maildirs

2003-07-08 Thread Jon Angliss
Hello C., On Tuesday, July 08, 2003, C. Bensend wrote... > I'm in the process of building out a new server, and I've chosen > Squirrelmail to take care of the point-n-click thing. It seems to be > very nice, but I have one hangup - I have multiple Maildirs set up, > and it seems that Squirrelmail

Re: [SM-USERS] Color highlighting

2003-07-08 Thread Jon Angliss
Hello Peter, On Tuesday, July 08, 2003, Peter Milne wrote... >> please upgrade > I have upgraded. Why does my ./config still say 1.4.0? Did I do > something wrong? :o) config version does NOT equal SquirrelMail version. Check functions/strings.php for the SquirrelMail version, or the ChangeLo

Re: [SM-USERS] Archive mail empty zips?

2003-07-08 Thread Mike Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I just installed Archive Mail 0.6 with 1.4.0 and it's not creating zip >> files. >> Well it sends 'INBOX.zip'. However it is a TEXT file with the following. >> 'ERROR Yeah I know, not a very usefull errormessage (id = 1, mailbox = INBOX >> sqimap_get_message)' > > try

Re: [SM-USERS] Tab in compose window

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Nicholson
> Stephen Lee said: >> How do I enter a Tab in the compose window to either generate white >> spaces or a true Tab? Currently Tab only moves focus to the next button. >> I'm running SM 1.2.11, RH7.3/php4.3.1/IE6. > > A quick Google search > (http://www.google.com/search?q=internet+explorer+html+tex

Re: [SM-USERS] Login Problem

2003-07-08 Thread Keith Hatfull
I should also add: Mercury/32 IMAP As I said, all works swimmingly with 1.2.10...just can't get past the login page with 1.4.1. Must be session related but heck if I can figure it out. Thanks (again), Keith Keith Hatfull wrote: Hi, Have a working SM configuration with: SM 1.2.10 PHP4.3.0

Re: [SM-USERS] Tab in compose window

2003-07-08 Thread Tracy McKibben
Stephen Lee said: > How do I enter a Tab in the compose window to either generate white > spaces or a true Tab? Currently Tab only moves focus to the next button. > I'm running SM 1.2.11, RH7.3/php4.3.1/IE6. A quick Google search (http://www.google.com/search?q=internet+explorer+html+textarea+tab&

[SM-USERS] Login Problem

2003-07-08 Thread Keith Hatfull
Hi, Have a working SM configuration with: SM 1.2.10 PHP4.3.0 Windows 2000 Server Apache 1.3.27 Trying to setup SM1.4 and get the classic "You must login..." error. I've tried about everything in the wiki...anyone have another clue what might be the case in going from SM 1.2.10 to 1.4? Can prov

Re: [SM-USERS] problem with Safari

2003-07-08 Thread Rick Castello
Lorene Evans said: > I am running SM 1.4.0 on a Solaris 8 platform. We are having trouble > using Safari as a browser. After a message is composed (either as a new > message, a reply or a forward), and the send button is hit, the screen > blanks out and nothing happens. The user has to click on

Re: [SM-USERS] Fatal error with Webcalendar plugin

2003-07-08 Thread troutb
Well I copied login.com to pear.php and hack it up see below. And the getOne function works get .. I still looking into ... but any insight would help! By the way ... why is the public access removed from the squirrel version of webcalendar? Won't want to still hare we people who don't have email

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachemnt Issues

2003-07-08 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Dwrisley, On Tuesday, July 08, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... > I am using SM 1.4 on Redhat 9.0 for my mail/web server. I am testing > with my PC which is Windows 2000 and using IE 6.0 SP1 as my browser. > Most of Squirrelmail works pretty good. However, I am having trouble > uploading s

RE: [SM-USERS] Attachemnt Issues - nevermind

2003-07-08 Thread DWrisley
Nevermind.Figured it out. I should have read further into the attachment size FAQ I found on SM. Apache 2.0 has another place, a php.ini file where this needs to be modified and changing it to the value I wanted, allowd the attachment of a larger file than before and removed the error page

Re: [SM-USERS] Slow behavior with no Internet connection

2003-07-08 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Jason, On Tuesday, July 08, 2003, Jason Lieurance wrote... > Squirrelmail 1.2.12cvs > Qmail > FreeBSD 4.7 > courier-imap 1.4.4 > PHP 4.3.0 > PHPA 1.3.3 > Our server is our email, web, and dns server. Today our dsl was down > and squirrelmail was slower than molasses on the LAN until the dsl

Re: [SM-USERS] Color highlighting

2003-07-08 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Peter, On Tuesday, July 08, 2003, Peter Milne wrote... > I have upgraded to 1.40 and am still having trouble highlighting some > mail. Has anyone else had troubles? Have you upgraded to 1.4.1? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --

[SM-USERS] Attachemnt Issues

2003-07-08 Thread DWrisley
I am using SM 1.4 on Redhat 9.0 for my mail/web server. I am testing with my PC which is Windows 2000 and using IE 6.0 SP1 as my browser. Most of Squirrelmail works pretty good. However, I am having trouble uploading some attachments. Some work just fine, and then others cause my browser to d

[SM-USERS] Color highlighting

2003-07-08 Thread Peter Milne
I have upgraded to 1.40 and am still having trouble highlighting some mail. Has anyone else had troubles? -- ~~~Pete~~~ http://milneweb.com http://nomorevirus.com --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate t

[SM-USERS] Slow behavior with no Internet connection

2003-07-08 Thread Jason Lieurance
Hello, Setup: Squirrelmail 1.2.12cvs Qmail FreeBSD 4.7 courier-imap 1.4.4 PHP 4.3.0 PHPA 1.3.3 Our server is our email, web, and dns server. Today our dsl was down and squirrelmail was slower than molasses on the LAN until the dsl came back up. That shouldn't effect the LAN performance but it di

RE: [SM-USERS] How to improve security for SM users

2003-07-08 Thread Chris Hilts
> would need to come before any calls to session_start(). So not necessarily > every PHP > file but every PHP file that made a call to session_start() instead. IIRC, we have a function to start the session, so it'd be a matter of editing one file in one spot. As to how useful this directive would

RE: [SM-USERS] How to improve security for SM users

2003-07-08 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
Andre Nicholson said: > The statement: > > session_cache_limiter('nocache'); > > would need to come before any calls to session_start(). So not necessarily > every PHP > file but every PHP file that made a call to session_start() instead. > > Although, I have no clue how sessions are maintained in

Re: [SM-USERS] /etc/squirrelmail/config_local.php missing bracket?

2003-07-08 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Michael, On Tuesday, July 08, 2003, Michael wrote... > Quick ? - I've installed the redhat 7.x version of the squirrelmail 1.4.1 rpm. > I've noticed that it added a new file: > config_local.php.rpmnew: It technically doesn't need the ?>, although it's nicer if it is put in... somebody

Re: [SM-USERS] /etc/squirrelmail/config_local.php missing bracket?

2003-07-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
> Now my question is, why does the above file not have the $> matching > bracket at the end? My squirrelmail 1.4.0.x install has it. This is not really a problem; PHP doesn't require the files to end with ?> for them to work just fine. Some people argue that it's better this way, because in this

RE: [SM-USERS] How to improve security for SM users

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Nicholson
The statement: session_cache_limiter('nocache'); would need to come before any calls to session_start(). So not necessarily every PHP file but every PHP file that made a call to session_start() instead. Although, I have no clue how sessions are maintained in SM PHP wise so a word from one of the

Re: [SM-USERS] Message flags

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Nicholson
How did you install the plugin? Did you simply overright the default SM PHP files with the plugin's versions (left_main.php, move_message.php and mailbox_display.php) or manually edit the original files adding the additional code? The 3 files that come attached to that plugin are meant for the 1.4

[SM-USERS] /etc/squirrelmail/config_local.php missing bracket?

2003-07-08 Thread Michael
Quick ? - I've installed the redhat 7.x version of the squirrelmail 1.4.1 rpm. I've noticed that it added a new file: config_local.php.rpmnew: -- matching bracket at the end? My squirrelmail 1.4.0.x install has it. mc --- This SF.Net email

RE: [SM-USERS] How to improve security for SM users

2003-07-08 Thread graeme
If my understanding is correct you will need to put the code at the top of each .php file. Can any php experts on the list confirm this or otherwise? > I don't code, but I'm willing to try this. What file would I put this > into- > login.php? src/webmail.php? > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

[SM-USERS] Upgraded to 1.4.1 - Still a few problems

2003-07-08 Thread Paj
Hi I have just done the upgrade to 1.4.1 without too much pain. However a few of the problems I previously had are still there (could not logon, Search does not work) and at least one seems to be fixed (message higlighting does generate an error but works). I do not need help with this as I kept n

[SM-USERS] Message flags

2003-07-08 Thread adrian
Have been using SM for what seems like ages now, got past the Cobalt Qube PHP 4.0.6 S L O W system and now using SME 5.6 on a P4 2.5 1gb RAM (heavenly f a s t ). Just tried 1.4.1 after Chris Hilts annoncement, and found message flags plugin gets header already sent errors for each message. I have

Re: [SM-USERS] problem with Safari

2003-07-08 Thread Tracy McKibben
Tracy McKibben said: > Lorene Evans said: >> I am running SM 1.4.0 on a Solaris 8 platform. We are having trouble >> using Safari as a browser. After a message is composed (either as a new > > Are you sure this is only a problem with Safari? Try any other browser > and see if the problem continu

[SM-USERS] IMAP compatibility problem?

2003-07-08 Thread Ian MacLeod
Hello, I've just installed squirrelmail (1.4.1) on a fresh mandrake 9.1 system. It's checking and sending mail on an older SCO Solaris machine. I can login fine, but when the system tries to get mail from the remote IMAP system, i get this error in red, center of where the inbox generally sh

RE: [SM-USERS] help on sm suddenly acting up.

2003-07-08 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
Just upgrade to SM 1.4.1 that will solve your problem. Marc. Robert said: > Thanks for your help. > I will try and delete the first message > and see if it works. > > > > RObert > >> >> I'm quite certain that this is an issue with PHP and/or SM not being >> able to handle some character or strin

RE: [SM-USERS] Re: SquirrelSpell won't work on RH Enterprise ES v2.1

2003-07-08 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
FWIW, I uninstalled 1.4.0 and installed 1.4.1-0.2.7.x.noarch.rpm and it's fixed. -Original Message- From: Scott Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SM-USERS] Re: SquirrelSpell won't work on RH Enterprise ES v2.1 Can an

[SM-USERS] "Read Receipt" replies misaddressed by SM

2003-07-08 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
If I receive an email from: "Joe Blow @ work" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> And Joe requested a read receipt when he sent it, I will receive a popup asking if I want to send the read receipt. If I click yes, I get the error: Requested action not taken: mailbox name not allowed Server replied: 553 malfor

[SM-USERS] Protocol error when using OpenLDAP 2.1.22 with Squirrelmail 1.4

2003-07-08 Thread DWrisley
I am trying to use OpenLDAP 2.1.22 with Squirrelmail 1.4 and am running into a protocol error when using the squirrelmail address book function to look up addresses in the LDAP server. Here is the exact error message I get while in squirrelmail: Error initializing LDAP server 192.168.1.73: [du

RE: [SM-USERS] How to improve security for SM users

2003-07-08 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
I don't code, but I'm willing to try this. What file would I put this into- login.php? src/webmail.php? >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'm not a php expert but isn't there a > session_cache_limiter(); > function that can be used to stop the browser caching? > > i.e. > > /

Re: [SM-USERS] problem with Safari

2003-07-08 Thread Tracy McKibben
Lorene Evans said: > I am running SM 1.4.0 on a Solaris 8 platform. We are having trouble > using Safari as a browser. After a message is composed (either as a new Are you sure this is only a problem with Safari? Try any other browser and see if the problem continues. My guess is it will (see

RE: [SM-USERS] help on sm suddenly acting up.

2003-07-08 Thread Robert
Thanks for your help. I will try and delete the first message and see if it works. RObert > > I'm quite certain that this is an issue with PHP and/or SM not being > able to handle some character or string of characters somewhere in the > headers of the malformed message. I've seen this happen

[SM-USERS] problem with Safari

2003-07-08 Thread Lorene Evans
I am running SM 1.4.0 on a Solaris 8 platform. We are having trouble using Safari as a browser. After a message is composed (either as a new message, a reply or a forward), and the send button is hit, the screen blanks out and nothing happens. The user has to click on the inbox again to bring so

[SM-USERS] small versioning error/oversight

2003-07-08 Thread Benjamin Tomhave
Hello, Thought I had completely lost it...but it turns out that the configure files all still read 1.4.0 in the 1.4.1 release. Not a huge deal, I don't think, but it completely threw me off to see "1.4.0" listed as the version when I went in to verify my upgraded install. Thanks, -ben --- Benj

RE: [SM-USERS] Announcement: SquirrelMail 1.4.1 released!

2003-07-08 Thread Benjamin Tomhave
There used to be a quick write-up on what steps to follow to upgrade from one version to another. I thought it was under the Documentation section of the web site, but I can't find it. Can someone point me to it? Thank you! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL

[SM-USERS] Issues when deleting messages

2003-07-08 Thread Gopi Balasingam
Hi, I recently ran into the following problem when trying to delete or moving messages to thrash? ERROR : Could not complete request. Query: EXPUNGE Reason Given: EXPUNGE failed: Checkpoint file failure: Permission denied It seems like an IMAP server error , however I was wondering what was cau

[SM-USERS] 1.4.1 problems

2003-07-08 Thread Martti Kuparinen
Hi! I'm maintaining squirrelmail in NetBSD and I tried the new 1.4.1. Any ideas what's wrong? www:/usr/pkg/share/squirrelmail> php src/login.php X-Powered-By: PHP/4.2.3 Content-type: text/html PHP Warning: Empty Delimiter in /usr/pkg/share/squirrelmail/plugins/administrator/auth.php on line 21 S

[SM-USERS] Squirrel Fishing...

2003-07-08 Thread pdontthink
Ah-hem... http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~yaz/en/squirrel_fishing.html/ --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an