Re: [SM-USERS] Link missing on the download page for filters-0.853

Hello Jason, On Sunday, December 08, 2002, Jason Corekin wrote... >>> The link to the download file for filters-0.853 is none existent >>> on it's download page. Is this plug-in no longer available? It >>> appeared to be a perfect match for my need to manipulate my >>> maildrop filters through the

Re: [SM-USERS] Link missing on the download page for filters-0.853

> Hello Jason, > On Sunday, December 08, 2002, Jason Corekin wrote... > >> The link to the download file for filters-0.853 is none existent on >> it's download page. Is this plug-in no longer available? It appeared >> to be a perfect match for my need to manipulate my maildrop filters >> through

Re: [SM-USERS] Link missing on the download page for filters-0.853

Hello Jason, On Sunday, December 08, 2002, Jason Corekin wrote... > The link to the download file for filters-0.853 is none existent on it's > download page. Is this plug-in no longer available? It appeared to be a > perfect match for my need to manipulate my maildrop filters through the > web.

[SM-USERS] Link missing on the download page for filters-0.853

The link to the download file for filters-0.853 is none existent on it's download page. Is this plug-in no longer available? It appeared to be a perfect match for my need to manipulate my maildrop filters through the web. Could somebody please inform me of the fate of this oh so promising of a p

[SM-USERS] Spam filtering

I'd do your filtering at the gateway level, NOT in the client (PHP web page). While squirrelmail CAN look at various DNSBL lists, its more appropriate to deny the spam before it gets into the box. I use a combination of qmail+rblsmtpd and spamassassin (with the "web bugs" score turned up to 3

Re: [SM-USERS] SM on RH 8.0 with Apache 2

Hello Jason, On Sunday, December 08, 2002, Jason Corekin wrote... > Thanks for the good news. Actually I have had the service up and running > since very early Saturday. I just was trying to do some research first to > avoid running into any major challenges. Now I just need to try to start > a

Re: [SM-USERS] Patch: Fixes to en_US help

Hello Toby, On Sunday, December 08, 2002, Toby A Inkster wrote... > This patch fixes a few grammatical errors -- apostrophes in the wrong > places and such. Also, it replaces "appends" with "prepends" where the > latter is more accurate. Thanks for these updates. I'll get them applied to the s

Re: [SM-USERS] Patch: Fixes to en_US help

Hello Toby, > This patch fixes a few grammatical errors -- apostrophes in the wrong > places and such. Also, it replaces "appends" with "prepends" where the > latter is more accurate. Thanks, I've incorporated these fixes in the help files so they will be part of the next release. Thijs -

Re: [SM-USERS] SM on RH 8.0 with Apache 2

Thanks for the good news. Actually I have had the service up and running since very early Saturday. I just was trying to do some research first to avoid running into any major challenges. Now I just need to try to start adding the appropriate plugins. Does anybody know if there is a plugin that

[SM-USERS] Patch: en_GB help

Save the patch below as "patch-squirrelmail-en_GB-help.diff" and then do the following: $ su [Enter root password] # cd /var/www/squirrelmail/help/ # cp -r en_US en_GB # cd en_GB # patch -p1 < /full/path/to/patch-squirrelmail-en_GB-help.diff # exit $ exit Note: while making this patch, I noticed

Re: [SM-USERS] SM on RH 8.0 with Apache 2

I've been using Redhat 8.0 + Apache 2.0.4 for 2 months. I've worked greatly. I'm using Postfix with this configuration. The amount it processes about 2000 mail a day. > I am trying to use Squirrelmail on Redhat 8.0. SM was installed via rpm > when I installed the machine and as of 12-06-2002 i

[SM-USERS] Patch: Fixes to en_US help

This patch fixes a few grammatical errors -- apostrophes in the wrong places and such. Also, it replaces "appends" with "prepends" where the latter is more accurate. Save the patch as "patch-squirrelmail-en_US-help-fixes.diff". Here's how to apply it: $ su [Enter root password] # cd /var/www/squi

[SM-USERS] spam filter

Hi What spam filter will you advice me to use, i can see that SM installs a spam filter by default, is there any of them that are good or should i wait for plugins to be avail again and get spamassasins? Dennis -- <> --- This sf.net email i

Re: [SM-USERS] Someone Assist me through IRC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Angliss wanted us to know: >> Yes I am using UW-Imap, and what do you mean by setting it as the INBOX >>From what I remember, UW reads INBOX from /var/spool/mail/$USER and the >rest of the mail files such as trash, sent, and drafts from /home

Re: [SM-USERS] share plugins

The procmail filter does not, and has never, worked. :) -deano - Original Message - From: "Arick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 9:36 PM Subject: [SM-USERS] share plugins > Dear all, > I am in hurry to find the "Procmail Filter Configuratio