Hi,
I have strange problem with Solr query. I added to my Solr Index new
document with "behave!" word inside content. While I was trying to search
this document using "behave" search term it was impossible. Only "behave!"
returns result. Additionaly search debug returns following information:
debu
So why Solr does not return proper document?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-parser-cuts-last-letter-from-search-term-tp4053432p4053435.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The problem was connected with filter order. WordDelimiterFilter should be
put before others. Thanks for your help.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-parser-cuts-last-letter-from-search-term-tp4053432p4053736.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list ar
Hi,
I configured index-based spell check component and unexpected problem
occurs.
*CASE 1: *
I added two documents with following content:
1. handbuch
2. hanbuch
The suggestions are returned for both terms: e.g. handbuch -> hanbuch and
hanbuch-> handbuch.
Comment: Works as expected.
*CASE 2:
I tried to add spellcheck.alternativeTermCount=5 but still no suggestion has
been found.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spell-check-component-does-not-return-any-suggestions-tp4053757p4053772.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
my request contains following term:
The are 3 facets:
groups, locations, categories.
When I select some items then I see such syntax in my request.
fq=groups:group1&fq=locations:location1
Is it possible to add OR clause between facets items in query?
--
View this message in context:
h
Hi,
is it possible to get exact matched result if the search term is combined
e.g. "cats" AND London NOT Leeds
In the previus threads I have read that it is possible to create new field
of String type and perform phrase search on it but nowhere the above
mentioned combined search term had been t
Thanks for your reply. I am using edismax as well. What I want to get is the
exact match without other results that could be close to the given term.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-matching-in-Solr-3-6-1-tp4058865p4058876.html
Sent from the Solr - User
I will explain my case in the example below:
We have three documents with given content:
First document:
london cats glenvilet
Second document
london cat glenvilet leeds
Third document
london cat glenvilet
Search term: "cats" AND London NOT Leeds
Expected result: First document
Current resu
Exact matching is just one of my cases. Currently I perform search on field
with given definition:
This field definition fullfils all other requirmen
Thanks for your reply but this solution does not fullfil my requirment
because other documents (not exact matched) will be returned as well.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-matching-in-Solr-3-6-1-tp4058865p4058929.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Hi,
I would like to send query like "car house". My expectation is to have
resulting documents that contains both car and house. Unfortunately Apache
Solr out of the box returns documents as if the whitespace between was
treated as OR. Does anybody know how to fix this?
BR
Pawos
--
View this m
Hi,
I am trying to index special characters and make them searchable.
User Story:
1. Index document with content: §$ %&/( )=? +*#'-<>
2. Find indexed document using search term: &
Additionaly I have several other fields that are copied to textAll Field.
The search is performed on this field.
Doe
After changing to white space tokenizer there are still no results for given
search term "&". Only when the whole word ("§$ %&/( )=? +*#'-<>") was given
as a search term, this document was shown in results.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Special-characters-n
Hi,
I have a problem with index time boosting. I created 4 new fields:
The first field: alltext is used as default field for searching. I copy
other 3 fields to it using copyField directive.
Unfortunately while searching boosting mechaism does not work. Alwa
Hi,
this is my request handler from solrconfig.xml:
explicit
10
text
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-time-field-boosting-tp4016010p4016049.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
16 matches
Mail list logo