Re: AW: refreshing synonyms.txt - or other configs

> public class DummyRequestHandler extends RequestHandlerBase is the "requesthandlerbase" your own class? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/refreshing-synonyms-txt-or-other-configs-tp708323p1030886.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble

Re: AW: refreshing synonyms.txt - or other configs

Ok. I got the RequestHandlerBase. My solr doesn't have any cores defined. Do the Solr have a default core running all the time? In order to use SolrQueryRequest and SolrQueryResponse do we have to define any other classes? Thanks for the help in advance. -- View this message in context: http:

Corename after Swap in MultiCore

Hi everyone, Long question but please hold on. I'm using a multicore Solr instance to index different documents from different sources( around 4) and I'm using a common config for all the cores. So, for each source I have core and temp core like 'doc' and 'doc-temp'. So, everytime I want to get n

RE: Corename after Swap in MultiCore

Do you mean solr.core.name has the wrong value after the swap? You swapped doc-temp so now it's doc and solr.core.name is still doc-temp? This completely contradicts my experience, what version of solr are you using? Why use postCommit? You're running the risk of performing a swap when you don't

Re: Corename after Swap in MultiCore

>> Shawn That is good if we can restart the solr. But we don't want to restart the whole solr after every commit because some of the core usually have to update for comparatively short times. So, we do a core reload to get all the synonyms and other stuff getting updated with out the solr reload.

Using Solr over Lucene effects performance?

Hello All, I searched for this but couldn't find a convincing answer. I'm planning to use Lucene/Solr in a tool for indexing and searching documents. I'm thinking of if I use Lucene directly instead of Solr, will it improves the performance of the search?(in terms of time taken for indexing or re

Re: Using Solr over Lucene effects performance?

Thanks for the quick reply Yonik, So you are saying that it all depends on how we setup the Solr? In a performance perspective, does Solr lags behind Lucene because it's a layer above Lucene to our application or will it have a better indexing and searching techniques than Lucene? (when talking ab

Re: Using Solr over Lucene effects performance?

Thanks alot Glen and Yonik... That's a very convincing explanation... -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-Solr-over-Lucene-effects-performance-tp2666909p2676015.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: problem using dataimporthandler

I know this thread is old but I encountered the exact same problem and couldn't figure out what's wrong. I'm using DIH for SQL Server. Please let me know. And the link that you provided seems to be not exist anymore. Thanks, Ram. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.c

Re: problem using dataimporthandler

Regarding the DIH problem: I'm encountering "content not allowed in prolog" only when I'm deploying solr on tomcat. I'm using the same data-config.xml in the solr example through jetty and it works fine and I can index the data. Please let me know what should be changed while using tomcat. Thanks

Re: problem using dataimporthandler

I got rid of the problem by just copying the other schema and config files( which sound like nothing to do with the error on the dataconfig file but I gave it a try) and it worked I don't know if I'm missing something here but its working now. Thanks, Ram. -- View this message in context: h