If this is is not done in an async way wouldn't this have a serious
performance impact?
Plaatje, Patrick wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I created a script that uses a Solr Search Component, which hooks into the
> main solr core and catches the searches being done. After this it
> tokenizes the sear
Hi Vincent,
If I recall correctly a wildcard query does not use any of the filters
defined in your fieldtype (search the news group for this). So using a
LowerCaseFilterFactory does not work and you'll need to do the to lower case
transform yourself on the client side (javascript?).
However, if
What is stopping you from defining different field types for faqs and
attorneys? One with index time synomyms and one without.
anuvenk wrote:
>
> I've posted a few questions on synonyms before and finally understood how
> it worked and settled with index-time synonyms. Seems to work much bette
Hi,
This is probably an easy question.
I am doing a simple query on postcode and house number. If the housenumber
contains a minus sign like:
q=PostCode:(1078 pw)+AND+HouseNumber:(39-43)
the resulting parsed query contains a phrase query:
+(PostCode:1078 PostCode:pw) +PhraseQuery(HouseNumber
I am running in to the same issue. I have tried to replace my
WhitespaceTokenizerFactory with a PatternTokenizerFactory with pattern
(\s+|-) but I still seem to get a phrase query. Why is that?
Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>
>> I am using Solr 1.3.
>> I have an index with a field called "name". It
fields in question?
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2010, at 10:05 AM, rswart wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is probably an easy question.
>>>
>>> I am doing a simple query on postcode and house number. If the
>>> housenumber
Cristal clear. Thanks for your response&time!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Tokenizer-question-tp27099119p27123281.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
