Thanks Shawn.
If Solr writes this info to Disk as soon as possible (which is what I am
seeing) then ramBuffer setting seems to be misleading.
Anyone else has any thoughts on this?
-Saroj
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/28/2011 11:18 PM, roz dev wrote:
>
Hi
As per this document, http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase,
omitNorms and termVectors have to be "explicitly" specified in some cases.
I am wondering what is the default value of these settings if solr schema
definition does not state them.
*Example:*
In above case, will Solr
Hi All
Solr has different types of caches such as filterCache, queryResultCache and
document Cache .
I know that if a commit is done then a new searcher is opened and new caches
are built. And, this makes sense.
What happens when commits are happening on master and slaves are pulling all
the delt
Hi All
I am sure that q vs fq question has been answered several times.
But, I still have a question which I would like to know the answers for:
if we have a solr query like this
q=*&fq=field_1:XYZ&fq=field_2:ABC&sortBy=field_3+asc
How does SolrIndexSearcher fire query in 1.4.1
Will it fire q
Hi All
We are getting this error in our Production Solr Setup.
Message: Element type "t_sort" must be followed by either attribute
specifications, ">" or "/>".
Solr version is 1.4.1
Stack trace indicates that solr is returning malformed document.
Caused by: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrSer
Wanted to update the list with our finding.
We reduced the number of documents which are being retrieved from Solr and
this error did not appear again.
Might be the case that due to high number of documents, solr is returning
incomplete documents.
-Saroj
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:13 PM, roz
t; >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
> >
> > There's really not much to go on here.
> >
> > Best
> > Erick
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:13 PM, roz dev wrote:
> >> Hi All
> >>
> >> We are getting
Hi All,
We are using Solr 1.4.1 in production and are considering an upgrade to
newer version.
It seems that Solr 3.x requires a complete rebuild of index as the format
seems to have changed.
Is Solr 4.0 index file format compatible with Solr 3.x format?
Please advise.
Thanks
Saroj
Hi All,
I need community's feedback about deploying newer versions of solr schema
into production while existing (older) schema is in use by applications.
How do people perform these things? What has been the learning of people
about this.
Any thoughts are welcome.
Thanks
Saroj
gram Content Group
> (615) 213-4311
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: roz dev [mailto:rozde...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 6:33 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: can we configure spellcheck to be invoked after request
> processing?
>
Hi All
I am wondering if there is a way to alter term frequency of a certain field
as 1, even if there are multiple matches in that document?
Use Case is:
Let's say that I have a document with 2 fields
- Name and
- Description
And, there is a document with data like this
Document_1
Name = Blu
s huge and the reason for Solr upgrade or schema
> change is to fix a bug, not to use new functionality.
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>
> On 24. jan. 2012, at 01:51, roz dev wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to understand features of Solr Cloud, regarding commits and
scaling.
- If I am using Solr Cloud then do I need to explicitly call commit
(hard-commit)? Or, a soft commit is okay and Solr Cloud will do the job of
writing to disk?
- Do We still need to use Master
Hi All,
I am working on an application which makes few solr calls to get the data.
On the high level, We have a requirement like this
- Make first call to Solr, to get the list of products which are
children of a given category
- Make 2nd solr call to get product documents based on a l
Hi All
>
> I have an index which contains a Catalog of Products and Categories, with
> Solr 4.0 from trunk
>
> Data is organized like this:
>
> Category: Books
>
> Sub Category: Programming
>
> Products:
>
> Product # 1, Price: Regular Sort Order:1
> Product # 2, Price: Markdown, Sort Order:2
>
uot;products which are on markdown, are at
> the bottom of the documents list"
>
> But in your examples, products on "markdown" are intermingled
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 3:36 AM, roz dev wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> >>
&
ubt very much given your
> problem description.
>
> So with a corpus that size, I'd "just try it'.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:12 PM, roz dev wrote:
> > Thanks Erik for your quick feedback
> >
> > When Products are assigned to
I think that there is no way around doing custom logic in this case.
If indexing process knows that documents have to be grouped then they
better be together.
-Saroj
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Nitesh Nandy wrote:
> Martijn,
>
> How do we add a custom algorithm for distributing documents
Hi All
We are using SolrJ client (v 1.4.1) to integrate with our solr search
server.
We notice that whenever SolrJ request does not match with Solr schema, we
get Bad Request exception which makes sense.
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Bad Request
But, SolrJ Client does not provide any clu
Hi All,
I am trying to tune ramBufferSizeMB and merge factor for my setup.
So, i enabled Lucene Index Writer's log info stream and started monitoring
Data folder where index files are created.
I started my test with following
Heap: 3GB
Solr 1.4.1,
Index Size = 20 GB,
ramBufferSizeMB=856
Merge Fac
Hi Guys
I am also seeing this problem.
I am using SOLR 4 from Trunk and seeing this issue repeat every day.
Any inputs about how to resolve this would be great
-Saroj
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Karthick Duraisamy Soundararaj <
karthick.soundara...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you find any m
it was from 4/11/12
-Saroj
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2012, at 3:18 PM, roz dev wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys
> >
> > I am also seeing this problem.
> >
> > I am using SOLR 4 from Trunk and seeing this issue repeat eve
5:12 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I'd take a look at this issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3392
>
> Fixed late April.
>
> On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:41 PM, roz dev wrote:
>
> > it was from 4/11/12
> >
> > -Saroj
> >
> &g
t; On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Karthick Duraisamy Soundararaj
> wrote:
> > Mark,
> > We use solr 3.6.0 on freebsd 9. Over a period of time, it
> > accumulates lots of space!
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:47 PM, roz dev wrote:
> >
> >
Hi All
I am trying to find out the reason for very high memory use and ran JMAP
-hist
It is showing that i have too many instances of org.tartarus.snowball.Among
Any ideas what is this for and why am I getting so many of them
num #instances#bytes Class description
---
wnable synchronizers:
- None
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> Try taking a couple of thread dumps and see where in the stack the
> snowball classes show up. That might give you a clue.
>
> Did you customize the parameters to the stemmer? If so, may
.html
Any inputs are welcome
-Saroj
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:39 PM, roz dev wrote:
> I did take couple of thread dumps and they seem to be fine
>
> Heap dump is huge - close to 15GB
>
> I am having hard time to analyze that heap dump
>
> 2012-07-30 16:07:32
> Full thread
Hi All
I am using Solr 4 from trunk and using it with Tomcat 6. I am noticing that
when we are indexing lots of data with 16 concurrent threads, Heap grows
continuously. It remains high and ultimately most of the stuff ends up
being moved to Old Gen. Eventually, Old Gen also fills up and we start
You are referring to a very old thread
Did you take any heap dump and thread dumo? They can help you get more
insight.
-Saroj
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Suneel wrote:
> Hello Kevin,
>
> I am also facing same problem After few hours or few day my solr server
> getting crash.
> I try t
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:34 PM, roz dev wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I am using Solr 4 from trunk and using it with Tomcat 6. I am noticing
> that
> > when we are indexing lots of data with 16 concurrent threads, Heap grows
> > continuously. It remains high and
Changing the Subject Line to make it easier to understand the topic of the
message
is there any plan to expose IndexDocValues as part of Solr 4?
Any thoughts?
-Saroj
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:10 PM, roz dev wrote:
> As we all know, FIeldCache can be costly if we have lots of documents
I have seen this happening
We retry and that works. Is your solr server stalled?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:50 PM, balaji.gandhi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am encountering this error randomly (under load) when posting to Solr
> using SolrJ.
>
> Has anyone encountered a similar error?
>
> org.apache.solr.
Thanks Hoss.
Yes, that approach would work as I can change the query.
Is there a way to extend the Edismax Handler to read a config file at
startup and then use some events like commit to instruct edismax handler to
re-read the config file.
That way, I can ensure that my boost params are just on
ing
> them on commit sounds like a way to make for a very confusing application!
>
> But if you really need to re-read all this info on a running system,
> consider the core admin RELOAD command.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:43 PM, roz dev wrote:
eally, if using
> index-time synonyms. And if you're using search-time synonyms you have
> multi-word synonym issue described on the Wiki.
>
> Otis
> --
> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
> On Nov 6, 2012 11:02 PM, "roz dev" wrote:
>
> > Eri
35 matches
Mail list logo
