{SearchTerms.1=SearchTerms=[Kev],,
_wcf.dataLanguageIds.0=_wcf.dataLanguageIds=[-1],,
AssociationType.1=AssociationType=[2,3,1],
So,my query is where do I need to make the changes to fetch the actual
result for this.
Please suggest me.Any help is highly appriciated.
Thanks
Prasenjit
--
View this message
ll the search result empty for the above condition.
Can you please suggest me what changes I need to do?
Thanks
Prasenjit
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Unable-to-search-with-the-number-contains-in-Product-Part-number-and-the-string-sontains-the-name-oft-tp399095
ll the search result empty for the above condition.
Can you please suggest me what changes I need to do?
Thanks Prasenjit
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Unable-to-search-with-the-number-contains-in-Product-Part-number-and-the-string-sontains-the-name-oft-t
all slaves connected with a single backplane ). Is 1
minute pollInterval reasonable ?
3. Is NRT a better/viable option compared to SolrReplication ?
-Thanks,
Prasenjit
to its
> different architecture (not master-slave that in replicas but all
> peers replicating)
So it seems SolrReplication is out ( if my pollInteterval < 5 minute
), right ? Let me look into SolrCloud. Any suggestions which one is
more stable SolrCloud/NRT ?
-Thanks,
Prasenjit
deletes triggers compaction. Or with every
commits ( while adds ) ? How bad they will effect on search response
time.
-Thanks,
Prasenjit
deletes just mark the doc-ids (
essentially means that the index size will remain the same ) , but
wont actually do the compaction till someone calls optimize/commit, is
my assumption not true ?
-Thanks,
Prasenjit
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Hi Prasenjit,
>
commit
> is probably hurting you far more than any index size
> savings.
>
> I'd actually think carefully about whether you need even
> 10 second commits. If you can stretch that out to minutes,
> so much the better. But it all depends upon your problem
> space.
>
> Be
increases.
-Prasenjit
--
Sent from my mobile device
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:27 AM, prasenjit mukherjee
> wrote:
>> Is anybody aware of any effort regarding porting solr to a netty ( or
>> any other async-io based framework ) based framework.
>>
>> Even on medium load ( 10 parallel clients ) wi
"-(: *c*) AND
(: **)". Can you please help here. As running only not query
with /export should be a valid use case. I have also checked the solr logs and
found no errors when running the not query.The query is just not returning any
value and it
11 matches
Mail list logo