AW: Indexing in one collection affect index in another collection

References, sorry: [1] https://support.microsoft.com/en-ca/help/976618/you-experience-performance-issues-in-applications-and-services-when-th [2] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/rammap -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dodd, Paul Sutton (UB) Gesendet: Dienstag, 29.

AW: Indexing in one collection affect index in another collection

Hi If the reason for the difference in speed is that the index is being read from disk, I would expect that the first query would be slow, but subsequent queries on the same collection should speed up. A query on the other collection could then be slower. In this case I would say that this is n

AW: RegexReplaceProcessorFactory pattern to detect multiple \n

You don’t say what happens, just that it is not working. I assume nothing is replaced? Perhaps the pattern should be "(\n\s*){2,}" ?? Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo Gesendet: Donn

AW: RegexReplaceProcessorFactory pattern to detect multiple \n

To avoid the «\n+\s*» matching too many \n and then failing on the {2,} part you could try (\n\s*){2,} If you also want to match CRLF then (\r?\n\s*){2,} Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo

AW: RegexReplaceProcessorFactory pattern to detect multiple \n

Hi Edwin 1. Sorry, the pattern was wrong, the space should preceed the \n i.e. (\s*\n){2,} 2. Perhaps in the data you have other (non printing) characters than \n? Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo

AW: RegexReplaceProcessorFactory pattern to detect multiple \n

BTW, which Java Version are you using? Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2019 08:13 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff:

AW: RegexReplaceProcessorFactory pattern to detect multiple \n

If the second step is executed first, then you will get the unwanted 4 Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2019 09:29 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org

AW: %solr_logs_dir% does not like spaces

Looks like a bug in solr.cmd. You could try eliminating the spaces and/or opening an issue. Instead of ‘Program Files (x86)’ use ‘PROGRA~2’ And don’t have spaces in your subdirectory… NB: Depending on your Windows Version you may Have another alias for ‘Program Files (x86)’; use «dir /X» t

AW: %solr_logs_dir% does not like spaces

Perhaps the instances of %SOLR_LOGS_DIR% in the solr.cmd files should be quoted i.e. "%SOLR_LOGS_DIR%" ?? Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: Arturas Mazeika Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2019 15:10 An: solr-user@l

AW: RegexReplaceProcessorFactory pattern to detect multiple \n

Hi Edwin Try for the first pattern/replacement [ \t]*\r?\n
Now all line endings and preceding whitespace characters should be changed to ‘’. The second pattern replacement should replace 3 or more ‘’ sequences to 2 ‘’ sequences: (

){3,}

Hope this approach

AW: RegexReplaceProcessorFactory pattern to detect multiple \n

Hi Edwin You are correct re the 2nd pattern – my bad. Looking at the 4 , it’s actually the sequence « »? So perhaps the first match pattern could be [ \t\x0b\f]*\r?\n i.e. [space tab vertical-tab formfeed] Regards, Paul Gesendet von Mail

AW: RegexReplaceProcessorFactory pattern to detect multiple \n

Hi Edwin I can’t understand why the pattern is not working and where the spaces between the are coming from. It should be possible to allow for spaces between the in the second match pattern however i.e. 2nd pattern (
[ \t\x0b\f]]*){3,} /Paul Gesendet von Mail

AW: RegexReplaceProcessorFactory pattern to detect multiple \n

Hi Edwin, With \W you will also replace non-word characters such as punktuation. If that's OK fine. Otherwise you need to identify the white space characters that are causing the problem. Von: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. März 2019 03:25:39 An: sol