Hello. I am using the spellcheck component
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572). Since the spell checker
index is kept in RAM, it gets erased every time the Solr server gets
restarted. I was thinking of using either the firstSearcher or the
newSearcher to reload the index every time So
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:55 AM, oleg_gnatovskiy <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello. I am using the spellcheck component
>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572). Since the spell checker
>> index
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:07 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Is there any way to do it for an external (file-based) dictionary?
>>
>
> SpellCheckComponent always reload on the dictionary in the firstSearcher
> event. This works if y
Hello,
I tried to have the spellcheck component to write to a drive index. My
config is a s follows:
org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellChecker
external
spellings.txt
UTF-8
true
./spellIndex
org.apache.lucene.search.spell.JaroWinklerDistance
oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried to have the spellcheck component to write to a drive index. My
> config is a s follows:
>
>
>name="classname">org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellChecker
> external
>
Hello. I have an index built in Solr with several multi-value fields. When
the multi-value field has only one value for a document, the XML returned
looks like this:
5693
However, when there are multiple values for the field, the XMl looks like
this:
arr name="someIds">
11199
1722
Is there a
Hello. We have an index with 15 million documents working on a distributed
environment, with an index distribution setup. While an index on a slave
server is being updated, query response times become extremely slow (upwards
of 5 seconds). Is there any way to decrease the hit query response times
this.
Does this mean that it happens during warming?
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:31 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello. We have an index with 15 million documents working on a
>> distributed
>> environment, with an i
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:06 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The rsync seems to have nothing to do with slowness, because while the
>> rsync
>> is going on, there isn't any reload occurring, once the files
cache autowarming.
>>
>> We turned this off and staged separate queries that pre-warm our standard
>> queries. We are looking at pulling the query server out of the load
>> balancer
>> during this process; it is the most effective way to give fixed response
>> time.
&g
We are still having this problem. I am wondering if it can be fixed with
autowarm settings. Is there a reliable formula for determining the autowarm
settings?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Query-Performance-while-updating-the-index-tp20452835p20968516.html
Sent from the
Hey Otis,
Do you think our problem is slow warm time, or too few items that are being
copied?
Oleg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Query-Performance-while-updating-the-index-tp20452835p20980523.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Here’s what we have on one of the data slaves for the autowarming.
--
Dec 12, 2008 8:46:02 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm
INFO: autowarming searc...@3f32ca2b main from searc...@443ad545 main
filterCache{lookups=351993,hits=347055,hitratio=0.98,inserts=8332,eviction
may
> have to set that value in the hundreds, as opposed to tens of thousands.
>
> -Todd Feak
>
> -Original Message-
> From: oleg_gnatovskiy [mailto:oleg_gnatovs...@citysearch.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 10:08 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
I just verified this. The slowness occurs after auto warm is done.
Oleg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Query-Performance-while-updating-the-index-tp20452835p20982068.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
20,000 and see if it helps.
>
> Second look at your document cache. Document caches don't use autowarm.
> But you can add queries to your firstSeacher and newSearcher entries in
> your solrconfig to pre-populate the document cache during warming.
>
> -Todd Feak
>
>
Hello again. It seems that we are still having these problems. Queries take
as long as 20 minutes to get back to their average response time after a
large index update, so it doesn't seem like the problem is the 12 second
autowarm time. Are there any more suggestions for things we can try? Taking
I can verify that multithreaded loading using HTTP does work. That's probably
the way to go.
zayhen wrote:
>
> Your 3 instances are trying to acquire the physical lock to the index.
> If you want to use multi-threaded indexing, I would suggest http
> interface,
> as Solr will control the reque
ndex before the update? Do you *really* need to
> do that?
> How large is your update, what makes it big, and could you make it
> smaller?
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>>
My aplogies, this is likely the same issue as "Intermittent high response
times by hbi dev "
oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
>
> Hello. Our production servers are operating relatively smoothly most of
> the time running Solr with 19 million listings. However every once in a
>
which
holds true based on the tests we ran.
oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
>
> My aplogies, this is likely the same issue as "Intermittent high response
> times by hbi dev "
>
>
>
> oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
>>
>> Hello. Our production servers are operat
What are some things that could happen to force files out of the cache on a
Linux machine? I don't know what kinds of events to look for...
yonik wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:46 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy
> wrote:
>> Hello. Our production servers are operating relativ
large newly optimized index onto the
> server.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: oleg_gnatovskiy
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, January 22,
our index before the update? Do you *really* need to
> do that?
> How large is your update, what makes it big, and could you make it
> smaller?
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>>
hatever
> queries are in flight? Try jconsole.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: oleg_gnatovskiy
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009
Can you expand on this? Mirroring delay on what?
zayhen wrote:
>
> Use multiple boxes, with a mirroring delaay from one to another, like a
> pipeline.
>
> 2009/1/22 oleg_gnatovskiy
>
>>
>> Well this probably isn't the cause of our random slow queries,
Just to calrify - we do not optimize on the slaves at all. We only optimize
on the master.
hossman wrote:
>
>
> : We do optimize the index before updates but we get tehse performance
> issues
> : even when we pull an empty snapshot. Thus even when our update is tiny,
> the
> : performance issue
Just to calrify - we do not optimize on teh slaves at all. We only optimize
on the master.
hossman wrote:
>
>
> : We do optimize the index before updates but we get tehse performance
> issues
> : even when we pull an empty snapshot. Thus even when our update is tiny,
> the
> : performance issue
Just to clarify - we do not optimize on the slaves at all. We only optimize
on the master.
hossman wrote:
>
>
> : We do optimize the index before updates but we get tehse performance
> issues
> : even when we pull an empty snapshot. Thus even when our update is tiny,
> the
> : performance issue
t; thanks a lot,
>
>
> oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
>>
>> Can you expand on this? Mirroring delay on what?
>>
>>
>>
>> zayhen wrote:
>>>
>>> Use multiple boxes, with a mirroring delaay from one to another, like a
>>> pipeline.
&
AlexElba wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have problem which I am trying to solve using solr.
>
> I have search text (term) and I have index full of words which are mapped
> to ids.
>
> Is there any query that I can run to do this?
>
> Example:
>
> Term
> "3) A recommendation to use VAR=value in th
dsteiger wrote:
>
> I've got a couple search components for automatic spell correction that
> I've been working on.
>
> I've converted most of the SpellCheckerRequestHandler to a search
> component (hopefully will throw a
> patch out soon for this). Then another search component that will do
Hello everyone.
I've run into a weird problem with Solr's ranking engine. In a nutshell, the
problem involves certain results getting EXTREMELY high rank scores. Here is
an example:
locRvwText:"Pizza Pizza"^10 OR locName:"Pizza Pizza"^30
The way I understand it is that the locName part of th
Sorry about the previous message, I had some formatting issues. Below is the
actual message!
oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> I've run into a weird problem with Solr's ranking engine. In a nutshell,
> the problem involves certain results getting EXTREMELY
Clay Webster wrote:
>
> Hey Folks,
>
> Reminder: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers lists the sites using
> Solr. The listing is a bit thin. I know many people don't know about the
> list or don't have the time to add themselves to the list. I'd like to be
> able to promote open sour
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
> It's a little hard to read that message, but if I were you I'd go to the
> Solr admin page, analysis section, enter your query, and see what index
> and query time analyzers spit out. I think that should at least give you
> some hints.
>
> Otis
>
> --
> Sematext -
Hello. I just started using solrJ recently and ran into a problem. I execute
the following line after creating a SolrQuery: SolrDocumentList solrResults
= engine.query(solrQuery).getResults();. solrResults.size() is always 10,
while solrResults.getNumFound() varies based on the query. My question
> method that you can call before running the query?
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
> - Original Message
> From: oleg_gnatovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2
Hello. I was wondering if anyone knew a way to do query level boosting with
SolrJ. On the http client I could just do something like sku:123^2.3 which
would boost the sky query 2.3 points.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Query-Level-Boosting-tp15995005p15995005.html
Sent f
Hello, this is actually a repost of a question posed by Swarag. I don't think
he made the question quite clear, so let me give it a shot. It is known that
Solr has support for index replication, and it has support for index
segmentation. The question is, how would you use the replication tools wit
Hello. I was wondering what happens when an add command is done without a
commit command. Is there any way to roll back?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/solr-commit-command-questions-tp16467824p16467824.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
So, what is the point of the commit?
oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
>
> Hello. I was wondering what happens when an add command is done without a
> commit command. Is there any way to roll back?
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/solr-commit-comma
Hello everyone. I downloaded the latest nightly build from
http://people.apache.org/builds/lucene/solr/nightly/. When I tried to
compile it, I got the following errors:
[javac] Compiling 189 source files to
/home/csweb/apache-solr-nightly/build/core
[javac]
/home/csweb/apache-solr-nightly/src
We are using the Chain Collapse patch as well. Will that not work over a
distributed index?
swarag wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am trying to search through a distributed index and when I enter this
> link:
>
> http://wil1devsch1.cs.tmcs:8983/select?shards=wil1devsch1.cs.tmcs:8983,wil1devsch1.cs.tmcs:8080
hossman wrote:
>
> :
> : Hello everyone. I downloaded the latest nightly build from
> : http://people.apache.org/builds/lucene/solr/nightly/. When I tried to
> : compile it, I got the following errors:
> :
> : [javac] Compiling 189 source files to
> : /home/csweb/apache-solr-nightly/build/cor
:
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:00 AM, oleg_gnatovskiy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We are using the Chain Collapse patch as well. Will that not work over a
>> distributed index?
>
> Since there is no explicit distributed support for it, it would only
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:57 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do you have any suggestions as to how we would be able to implement
>> chain
>> collapse over the entire distributed index? Our collection is 27 GB, 15
&g
Hello. I am having a similar problem as the OP. I see that you recommended
setting 4GB for the index, and 2 for Solr. How do I allocate memory for the
index? I was under the impression that Solr did not support a RAMIndex.
Walter Underwood wrote:
>
> Do it. 32-bit OS's went out of style five ye
/sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
> - Original Message
> From: oleg_gnatovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:05:23 PM
> Subject: Re: too many queries?
>
>
> Hello. I am having a similar p
Hello. I was wondering if Solr has some kind of a multi-threaded document
loader? I've been using post.sh (curl) to post documents to my Solr server,
and it's pretty slow. I know it should be pretty easy to write one up, but I
was just wondering if one already existed.
--
View this message in con
Hello. I was wondering if there is a way to get solr to return fields with
the same value for a particular field together. For example I might want to
have all the documents with exactly the same name field all returned next to
each other. Is this possible? Thanks!
--
View this message in context
e top...
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:58 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello. I was wondering if there is a way to get solr to return fields
>> with
>> the same value for a particular field together. For example I might want
There is an XSLT example here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/XsltResponseWriter
, but it doesn't seem like that would work either... This example would only
do a group by for the current page. If I use Solr for pagination, this would
not work for me.
oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
>
> But I
e one for trunk needs
> some work before it can work...
>
> ryan
>
>
> On May 13, 2008, at 2:46 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
>>
>> There is an XSLT example here:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/XsltResponseWriter
>> , but it doesn't seem like that would
Hello. I am having some trouble getting spelling suggestions to work. I am
running the latest nightly build of Solr. The URL I am hitting is:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=pizzza&qt=spellchecker&cmd=rebuild
and the response I am getting is
0
14
rebuild
pizzza
spellc
ou asking the handler
> for spellchecking (q=pizzza) or are you asking it to rebuild the index
> (cmd=rebuild)? Asking for both at the same time might not be the best
> thing.
>
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
> -
56 matches
Mail list logo
