Hi Alessandro,
I think you are facing this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6246
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Cloud-suggesters-Collection-Reload-Fail-tp4230478p4230591.html
Sent from the Solr - User mai
Hi Julien,
just one additional thing,
if you developed some plugins/filters, you will have to adapt and compile
them for the Solr 5 API.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/collection-API-timeout-tp4238150p4238511.html
Sent from the
Dear All,
we just finished the migration of a cluster from Solr 4.3.1 to Solr 4.6.1.
With solr 4.3.1 a node was not considered as active before the end of the
warming process.
Now, with solr 4.6.1 a replica is considered as active during the warming
process.
This means that if you restart a repli
In other words, is there a way for the LBHttpSolrServer to ignore replicas
which are currently "cold" ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replica-active-during-warming-tp4135274p4135542.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list a
Thank you Mark.
The issue : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6086
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replica-active-during-warming-tp4135274p4136038.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Erick,
I do not pass the LBHttpSolrServer to the c'tor of CloudSolrServer.
thx,
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replica-active-during-warming-tp4135274p4136828.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co
Hi,
this could be a network issue, like dns resolving.
To verify this you could update your host file with the ip address of your
nodes.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Inconsistent-query-times-tp4138956p4142098.html
Sent from
Hi Moshe,
If I understand correctly your needs, I think you want to use the
CollapsingQParser post filter:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40509582
I think that, basically, adding this filter to your query should solve your
problem:
fq={!collapse field=document_
Hi Lou,
The Solr query Parser creates fuzzy queries with a maximum of 50 term
expansions.
This is the default value and this is hard coded in the FuzzyQuery class.
I would say this is your problem.
I think you could create a new Query Parser which could create the fuzzy
query with a bigger value
You have to create your own parser which extends the current query parser.
You have to override the newFuzzyQuery protected function to call the
FuzzyQuery constructor with a configured maximum expansion value or
something like that.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in conte
Dear all,
we are currenty using Solr 4.3.1 in production (With SolrCloud).
We encounter quite the same problem described in this other old post:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-CloudSolrServer-Zookeeper-disconnects-and-re-connects-with-heavy-memory-usage-consumption-td4026421.html
Thanks a lot for your answer.
Is there a web page, on the wiki for instance, where we could find some JVM
settings or recommandations that we should used for Solr with some index
configurations?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.co
Dear all,
I would like to group my query results on two different fields (not at the
same time).
I also would like to get the exact group count.
And I'm working with a sharded index.
I know that to get the exact group count, all documents from a group must be
indexed in a unique shard.
Now, is t
Dear all,
let's say you have two multivalued fields with two different complex
analyzers in a quite complex schema.
I would like to match specific combinations of values in these fields.
For instance :
Field1 : Value1, Value2
Field2 : Value3, Value4
I would like to match this document with a q
Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote
> Are you saying you want to match 1st value with 1st value (like positional
> constraints?).
That's exactly what I would like to do. :)
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp41
Thx Alex.
We have main documents in the index. (more than 100 complex fields).
Each document can have events attached.
An event contains 4 fields with 3 different analyzers.
We need more than just filtering on them (highlighting on documents and
events at the same time for instance).
That means
Thx Alex for your answer.
1) This could be tricky, because the application users write very complex
combined queries with main document fields and event fields too. A custom
parser does the abstraction. I think that could be very tricky to extract
event part of a complex query in order to filter o
I 've just finished a first implementation of a CrossFieldSpanNearQuery and
it just works perfectly :D
I can now play with position increments and slops to get "exact" results
within two multi valued fields.
And for the 1st proposal, my user queries can be bigger than 10k with lots
of different b
That's excellent Mikhail !
Thanks so much.
I have to use it in my custom query parser now.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4160668.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archiv
How many different values do you have in your fields and do you know them ?
Faceting by query is not an option for you ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Combining-several-fields-for-facets-tp4160679p4160866.html
Sent from the So
Hi Giovanni,
we had this problem as well.
The cause was that the different nodes have slightly different idf values.
We solved this problem by doing an optimize operation which really remove
suppressed data.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n
Hello Suchi,
I'm using this Lucene function with Solr 4.6.1 in a specific Update
Processor and it's working well.
How do you test the update ?
I'm using a ValueSourceRangeFilter with a LongFieldSource parameter.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.4720
Hi Stephon,
do you see Zookeeper timeout errors in your log files ?
Could you please give us additional informations like :
How often is your index updated ? Which version of Solr do you use ? What is
the size of your index ?
Make sure you have this handler in your solr configuration file :
Hi Stephon,
nothing obvious to me. But it is early in the morning for a saturday :D
Did you comment out the old-style replication configuration since your first
message ?
Do you always see the same behavior ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066
Dear all,
I would like to get the new terms of fields since last update (once a week).
If I retrieve some terms which were already present, it's not a problem (but
terms which did not exist before must be retrieved).
Is there an easy way to do that ?
I'm currently investigating the possibility
The Apache Solr community is sooo great !
Interesting problem with 3 interesting answers in less than 2 hours !
Thank you all, really.
Erik,
I'm already saving the billion of terms each week. It's hard to diff 1
billion of terms.
I'm already rebuilding the whole dictionaries each week in a cust
I think payloads are per posting informations which means that it's not
trivial (to me at least ;)) to get terms for a given payload. And it's quite
intensive to scan all postings.
I will check for the bloom filter idea.
Thx
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http:
To me, it seems you are looking for faceting with the parameter
facet.mincount:
facet=true&facet.field=groupField&facet.mincount=yourMinimumValue.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-groups-which-has-the-number-of-elements-great
Andrei,
Pivot faceting is the Solr implementation for Hierarchical Facets. I don't
think this is what you need.
Could you please describe the original use case ? Just to eliminate XY
problem.
I don't know if this is acceptable for you in term of performance but you
could try to solve your proble
I don't know if this is possible for you but:
could you pre-process the group and create nested documents with
pre-computed document counts ?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Uploading+Data+with+Index+Handlers?focusedCommentId=48792150#UploadingDatawithIndexHandlers-NestedChildDoc
You could try to denormalize even more :
Create two collections:
- one with user groups in mind
- the second collection with user and groupSignature groups in mind.
For instance, with user groups in mind :
{
"id": "svsKQSFfzhu-SznsU8FUII",
"user": "admin",
"furniture_cou
Hi,
do you have warming queries with complex sorting/faceting clauses ?
Could you please share this part of your configuration ?
How many documents do you have in your index ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-restart-is-t
instanceDir=.
does that fit your needs ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/core-creation-and-instanceDir-parameter-tp3287124p3302496.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
it is possible to create a new similarity class which returns the term
occurrences.
You have to disable Idf (just return1), normalization and co.
then you have to declare it in your schema:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Similarity
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#Similarity
And to complete the answer of Erick,
in this search,
customer_name:"Joh*"
* is not considered as a wildcard, it is an exact search.
another thing, (it is not your problem...),
Words with wildcards are not analyzed,
so, if your analyzer contains a lower case filter,
in the index, these words
Hi Remy,
could you paste the analyzer part of the field merchant_name_t please ?
And when you say "it should return more than that", could you explain why
with examples ?
If I'm not wrong, the field collapsing function is based on indexed values,
so if your analyzer is complex (not "string"),
Ok, thanks for the schema.
the merchant "Cult Beauty Ltd" should be indexed like this:
cult
beauty
ltd
I think some other merchants contain at least one of these words.
you should try to group with a special field used for field collapsing:
I think you could even disable the stored value f
I just checked, you can disable the storing parameter and use this field:
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/FieldCollapsing-don-t-return-every-groups-tp3376036p3376316.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.c
excellent !
and yes, il fait très beau en France :)
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/FieldCollapsing-don-t-return-every-groups-tp3376036p3376362.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Jason,
you could add this filter to the end of your analyzer :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.PositionFilterFactory
That should solve your problem.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Phrase-sear
Hi,
I'm not sure to see what you mean, but perhaps synonyms could solve your
problem ?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/getting-solr-to-expand-A
I think this is what you are looking for :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.PositionFilterFactory
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Splitting-Words-but-retaining-offsets-tp3546104p3547977.html
Sent fr
Hi,
you have to use the 'expungeDeletes' additional parameter:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages
and depending on the version of Solr you are using, you perhaps have to use
a merge policy like the LogByteSizeMergePolicy.
See : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2725
Ludovic
Hello,
you can get the source code from the svn repository too :
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_5/
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Src-code-download-url-needed-for-SOLR-3-5-tp3671810p3673818.htm
Hi Michael,
it was late yesterday when I wrote my last message.
And it did not help that much.
Feel free to contact me directly. I can not share the code I wrote for legal
obligations.
But I can help you :)
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.
Dear all,
I would like to mark documents as hidden.
I could add a field "hidden" and pass the value to "true", but the whole
documents will be reindexed.
And External file fields are not searchable.
I could store the document keys in an external database and filter the
result with these ids. But
Excellent Erik ! It works perfectly.
"Normal" filter queries are cached. Is it the same for frange filter queries
like this one ? :
fq={!frange l=0 u=10}removed_revision
Thanks to both for your answers.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.na
One more question, is there already a way to update the external file (add
values) in Solr ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Mark-document-as-hidden-tp4045756p4045823.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.
Ok, thanks Erik.
Do you see any problem in modifying the Update handler in order to append
some values to this file ?
Ludovic
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Mark-document-as-hidden-tp4045756p4045839.html
Sent from the Solr - User maili
I could create an UpdateRequestProcessorFactory that could update this file,
it seems to be better ?
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Mark-document-as-hidden-tp4045756p4045842.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co
Hi Kamaci,
why don't you use the Nutch indexing functionality ?
The Nutch Crawling script already contains the Solr indexing step.
http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/bin/nutch%20solrindex
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-Integ
Ok, I have created a processor which manages to update the external file.
Basically,
until a commit request, the hidden document IDs are stored in a Set and when
a commit is requested, a new file is created by copying the last one, then
the additional IDs are appended to the external file.
Now
Hi Jack,
the external files involved in External File Fields are not stored in the
configuration directory and cannot be replicated this way, furthermore in
Solr Cloud, additional files are not replicated anymore.
There is something like that in the code:
/ if (confFileNameAlias.size() < 1 ||
Thanks Jack for your answers.
All files in the index directory are replicated ? I thought that only the
lucene index files were replicated.
If you are right, that's great, because I could create an ExternalFileField
type which could get its input file from the index directory and not from
the data
Oh, I see :) I did not catch well what you said.
Well, my index could contain 80 millions of elements and a big amount of
them could be hidden.
As you already said, I don't think that ZooKeeper is the right place to
store these files, they are too big.
Thank you again, that gave me some ideas I w
Thanks Jack.
I finally managed to replicate the external files with my own replication
handler.
But now, there's an issue with Solr in the Update Log replay process.
The default processor chain is not used, this means that my processor which
manage the external files is not used...
I have creat
Hi,
I was looking for something similar.
I tried this patch :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2112
it's working quite well (I've back-ported the code in Solr 3.5.0...).
Is it really different from what you are trying to achieve ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message
Hi David,
I think you should add this option : flatten=true
and the could you try to use this XPath :
/MedlineCitationSet/MedlineCitation/AuthorList/Author
see here for the description :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Configuration_in_data-config.xml-1
I don't think the that th
Hi David,
what do you want to do with the 'commonField' option ?
Is it possible to have the part of the schema for the author field please ?
Is the author field stored ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/correct-XPATH-syntax-tp3951
ok, not that easy :)
I did not test it myself but it seems that you could use an XSL
preprocessing with the 'xsl' option in your XPathEntityProcessor :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Configuration_in_data-config.xml-1
You could transform the author part as you wish and then import
Hi Bruno,
will you use facets and result sorting ?
What is the update frequency/volume ?
This could impact the amount of memory/server count.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/System-requirements-in-my-case-tp3985309p3985327.html
Hi Suajtha,
each webapps has its own solr home ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multicore-Issue-Server-Restart-tp3986516p3986602.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It is possible to use the "expungeDeletes" option in the commit, that could
solve your problem.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_attributes_for_.22commit.22
Sadly, there is currently a bug with the TieredMergePolicy :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2725 SOLR-272
Hi,
It seems that we have the same problem, how did you solve it ? Did you write
some pieces of code ?
thx,
Ludovic
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Full-text-hit-term-highlighting-tp2020402p2698440.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing l
You could develop your own tokenizer to extract the different forms of your
ids.
It is possible to extend the pattern tokenizer.
Ludovic.
Le 25 mars 2011 21:13, "David Yang [via Lucene]" <
ml-node+2732007-1439913827-383...@n3.nabble.com> a écrit :
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am having some really strang
The other way could be to extend the SolrQueryParser to read a per field
default operator in the solr config file. Then it should be possible to
override this functions :
setDefaultOperator
getDefaultOperator
and this two which are using the default operator :
getFieldQuery
addClause
The you ju
Tom,
to solve this kind of problem, if I understand it well, you could extend the
query parser to support something like meta-fields. I'm currently developing
a QueryParser Plugin to support a specific syntax. The support of
meta-fields to search on different fields (multiple languages) is one of
Do you want to tokenize subwords based on dictionaries ? A bit like
disagglutination of german words ?
If so, something like this could help : DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/CDRG_ch05_5.8.8
Ludovic
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org
So if i understand well, in these exemples :
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=*:*&fq={!q.op=AND%20df=common_names}"companion
mank"~10
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=*:*&fq={!q.op=AND%20df=common_names}"companion
manki"~10
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=*:*&fq={!q.op=AND%20df=co
'conditional' seems to be stemmed into the word 'condit' in the index.
So your results are normal.
As you said, mixing wildcards searching and stemmed fields is not
recommanded.
Ludovic.
2011/4/1 Melanie Drake [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2763787-65059921-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> I noticed an inconsi
And to be more helpfull, you can activate the debug (debugQuery=on in the
query) mode to see the transform query :
for instance 'field:contitional' :
field:conditional
field:conditional
field:condit
field:condit
for 'field:conditional*' :
field:conditional*
field:conditional*
field:conditional*
You could turn on the debug mode, there is a part which explain the scoring
of the query. It is a bit tricky but that could help.
Could you paste your query (full url), and the field definition in your
schema please ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.4
I managed to find both documents with your two input queries .
Add this filter in your analyzer query part :
=>
The main problem is that your query "microsoft" is transfor
Is there any Stemming configured in for this field in your schema
configuration file ?
Ludovic.
2011/4/5 Nemani, Raj [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2780463-48954297-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> All,
>
> I am using solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory to perform accent insensitive
> search. One of the words that g
Your analyzer contains these two filters :
before :
So two things :
The words you are testing are not english words (no ?), so the stemming will
have strange behavior.
If you really want to remove accents, try to put the
ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory before the two others.
Ludovic.
-
Jo
this analyzer seems to work :
I used Spanish stemming, put the ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory before the
stemming filter and added it in the que
You could use the replication to replicate the configuration files :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
What do you want to do with your different cores ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Shared-conf-tp2787771p2789447.htm
It seems that tokens are sorted by frequencies :
...
Collections.sort(profile, new TokenComparator());
...
and
private static class TokenComparator implements Comparator {
public int compare(Token t1, Token t2) {
return t2.cnt - t1.cnt;
}
and cnt is the token count.
Ludovic.
20
the original order comes from the way they are
> inserted in hashmap 'tokens' and not from the order the tokens appear on
> original text.
>
> Frederico
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lboutros [mailto:[hidden
> email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&no
Which version of solr are you using ?
NGrams could be an option but could you give us the field definition in your
schema ? The words count in this field index ?
Ludovic.
2011/4/10 Ueland [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2802561-121096623-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> Hi!
>
> I have been doing some testing wi
Did you configure synonyms for your field at query time ?
Ludovic.
2011/4/11 royr [via Lucene]
> Hello,
>
> I have some synonyms for city names. Sometimes there are multiple names for
> one city, example:.
>
> newyork, newyork city, big apple
>
> I search for "big apple" and get results with ne
You can add to your search handler the "shards" parameter :
host1/solr, host2/solr
Is is what you are looking for ?
Ludovic.
2011/4/11 Ran Peled [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2806331-346788257-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> In the Distributed Search page (
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearc
If you are using the Dismax query parser, perhaps could you take a look to
the minimum should match parameter 'mm' :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#mm_.28Minimum_.27Should.27_Match.29
Ludovic.
2011/4/13 Mark Mandel [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2815186-149863473-383...@n3.nabble.com>
did you try with the comlete xpath ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/all-searches-return-0-hits-what-have-I-done-wrong-tp2833706p2833798.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If a document contains multiple 'txt' fields, it should be marked as
'multiValued'.
But if I'm understanding well, you also tried this ? :
And for your search (MomsManual), could you give us your analyzer from the
schema.xml please ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in co
You could create a new Similarity class plugin that take in account every
parameters you need. :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins?highlight=%28similarity%29#Similarity
but, as Jan said, be carefull with the cost of the the similarity function.
Ludovic.
2011/4/19 Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
Perhaps this could help :
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Shared-conf-td2787771.html#a2789447
Ludovic.
2011/4/20 kun xiong [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2841801-1701787156-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> Hi all,
>
> Currently in my project , most of the core configurations are
> same(solrconfig.xml, dataim
There is a jar for the tests in solr.
I added this dependency in my pom.xml :
org.apache.solr
solr-core
3.1-SNAPSHOT
tests
test
jar
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://luce
What you want to do is something like a left outer join, isn't it ?
something like : select table2.OS06Y, f1,f2,f3,f4,f5 from table2 left outer
join table1 on table2.OS06Y = table1.OS06Y where ...
could you prepare a view in your RDBMS ? That could be another solution ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
Fra
coud you try to escape white spaces like this:
Hind\ claw
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Facing-problem-with-white-space-in-synonyms-tp2870193p2870552.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
you could use EdgeNGramFilterFactory :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory
And you should mix front and back ngram process in your analyzer :
is it better ?
Ludovic.
-Jouve
France.--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n
Do you want to search on the datas from the tables together or seperately ?
Is there a join between the two tables ?
Ludovic.
2011/5/2 Greg Georges [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2891256-222073995-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> Hello all,
>
> I have a system where I have a dataimporthandler defined for one tab
ok, so It seems you should create a new index and core as you said.
see here for the management :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
But it seems that is a problem for you. Is it ?
Ludovic.
2011/5/2 Greg Georges [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2891277-472183207-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> No, the data
Hi,
I think you have to use stemming on both side (index and query) if you
really want to use stemming.
Ludovic
2011/5/3 Dmitry Kan [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2893599-894006307-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> Dear list,
>
> In SOLR schema on the index side we use no stemming to support favor
> wildcard sea
Dmitry,
I don't know any way to keep both stemming and consistent wildcard support
in the same field.
To me, you have to create 2 different fields.
Ludovic.
2011/5/3 Dmitry Kan [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2893628-993677979-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> That's an option we had before we dec
In the ant script there is a target to generate maven's artifacts.
After that, you will be able to open the project as a standard maven
project.
Ludovic.
2011/5/4 Gabriele Kahlout [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2898068-621882422-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to modify Solr and I think d
oups,
sorry, this was not the target I used (this one should work too, but...),
the one I used is get-maven-poms. That will just create pom files and copy
them to their right target locations.
I'm using netbeans and I'm using the plugin "Automatic Projects" to do
everything inside the IDE.
Which
ok, this is part of my build.xml (from the svn repository) :
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-build-Solr-as-a-maven-project-tp2898068p2898339.html
Sent from
did you update this part in your solrconfig.xml ?
LUCENE_31
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Deprication-warnings-in-Solr-log-tp2898163p2898749.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I do not build this part, I don't need it.
The lib was present in the branch_3x branch, but is not there anymore.
You can download it here :
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/out?u=http%3A%2F%2Fdownloads.osafoundation.org%2Fdb%2Fdb-4.7.25.jar
You have to install it locally.
Ludovic.
2
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo