e a weightField as a combination of the 3
boosting fields?
Is this possible, or am I best off indexing with Ngrams like this:
http://www.andornot.com/blog/post/Advanced-autocomplete-with-Solr-Ngrams-and-Twitters-typeaheadjs.aspx
Thoughts most welcome.
Thanks
James
ield which is not a
DocValue, the log output is very similar. Can I increase verbosity? Will it
tell me more about the type of update then?
Thank you!
James
_version_ field should not change when
performing an atomic update operation?
Thanks
James
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Amrit Sarkar [mailto:sarkaramr...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2017 11:35
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Howto verify that update is &qu
enstag, 17. Oktober 2017 12:43
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Howto verify that update is "in-place"
James,
@Amrit: Are you saying that the _version_ field should not change when
> performing an atomic update operation?
It should change. a new version will be allotted to
Steps to reproduce:
Use Solr in SolrCloud mode.
Create collection with implicit routing and router.field set to some field,
e.g. "routerfield".
Index very small document. Stop time -> X
Index very large document. Stop time -> Y
Apply update to large document. Note that update command has at least
On my Solr 6.6 server I'd like to use BlendedTermQuery.
https://lucene.apache.org/core/6_6_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/BlendedTe
rmQuery.html
I know it is a Lucene class. Is there a Solr API available to access it? If
not, maybe some workaround?
Thanks!
I am build the solr index on the hadoop, and at reduce step I run the task that
merge the indexes, each part of index is about 1G, I have 10 indexes to merge
them together, I always get the java heap memory exhausted, the heap size is
about 2G also. I wonder which part use these so many memory.
at 01:29:39PM +0800, James wrote:
>> I am build the solr index on the hadoop, and at reduce step I run the task
>> that merge the indexes, each part of index is about 1G, I have 10 indexes to
>> merge them together, I always get the java heap memory exhausted, the heap
>> s
earch? And, do you
>> use filter queries- these are very powerful at limiting searches.
>>
>> 2012/2/7 James :
>> > Is there any practice to load index into RAM to accelerate solr
>> performance?
>> > The over all documents is about 100 million. The search tim
the phrase query. A document that says
*Foo* term1 term2 term3 term4 term5 term6 term7 term8 term9 *bar*
will not (because the search terms are within a group of 11 terms).
Note: If any search term is a MUST-NOT term, the phrase slop query will
never match.
"
Anybody willing to review and change to documentation?
Thanks,
James
Hi Evert,
I recently needed help with phrase highlighting and was pointed to the
FastVectorHighlighter which worked out great. I just made a change to the
configuration to add generateWordParts="0" and generateNumberParts="0" so that
searches for things like "1a" would get highlighted correctly
.pdf"
with the same result no highlight in the respond as below:
"highlighting": { "pdf1": {} }
=(
Really... do not know what to do...
Thanks for your time, if you have any more suggestion where I could be missing
something... please let me know.
Todd,
I have no idea if this will perform acceptable with so many multiple values. I
doubt the solr/patch code was really optimized for such a use case. In my
production environment, I have je-6.2.31.jar on the classpath. I don't think
I've tried it with other versions.
James D
ting on _that_ field. Try
> > adding "debug=query" to the URL and look at the "parsed_query" section
> > of the return and you'll see what field(s) is/are actually being
> > searched against.
> >
> > NOTE: The field you highlight on _must_ have st
Ryan,
The json response format changed for Solr 5.0. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3029 . Is the single-core solr
running a 4.x version with the cloud solr running 5.x ? If they are both on
the same major version, then we have a bug.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
But if you really need more than 2 edits, I think IndexBasedSpellChecker
supports it.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:29 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: How get around solr&#
See the old docs at
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#Configuration
In particular, you need this line in solrconfig.xml:
./spellchecker
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Solanki [mailto:nitinml...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 22
monitor what’s happening with the background
merges.
Thanks,
James
complete?).
Thanks,
James
> On 25 Jan 2016, at 21:39, Jack Krupansky wrote:
>
> What exacting are you merge policy settings in solrconfig? They control
> when the background merges will be performed. Sometimes they do need to be
> tweaked.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> O
be to add "spellcheck.collateParam.mm=100%" or
"spellcheck.collateParam.q.op=100%", so when testing collations against the
index, it will require all the terms to match something. See
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collateParam.XX for
more informati
elp with more information from you?
Can you provide a few document examples that have Bangla text, then the full
query request with a misspelled Bangla word (from the document examples you
provide), then the full spellcheck response, and the total # of documents
returned ?
James Dyer
Ingra
Talha,
Can you try putting your queried keyword in "spellcheck.q" ?
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: talha [mailto:talh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 10:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr spell check not s
to write a transformer to get what you want.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: coolmals [mailto:coolm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 12:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: exclude folder in dataimport handler.
I am importing files from my file
boost the term frequency).
Keep in mind that while this will work fine for regular word-by-word spell
suggestions, collations are not going to work well with these approaches.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Max Chadwick [mailto:mpchadw...@gmail.com]
Sent
ed at
and possibly we can come up with a way to handle these cases.
A way to work around these bugs is to strip your query down to raw terms,
separated by spaces, and use "spellcheck.q" with the raw terms only.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From:
Mark! For what it's worth - up
vote. Thanks!
Cheers!
-Teague James
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 6:12 PM, Koji Sekiguchi
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think I saw similar requirement recently in mailing list. The feature
> sounds reasonable to me.
>
> > If not, how
y well-documented on the old solr wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collate
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Arnon Yogev [mailto:arn...@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 2:33 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Spell
he query string you are trying.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Mark Fenbers [mailto:mark.fenb...@noaa.gov]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 2:38 PM
To: Solr User Group
Subject: File-based Spelling
Greetings!
I'm attempting to use a file-based spell checker.
isn't the most elegant solution but it
gets around the fact that DIH is single-threaded.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: nabil Kouici [mailto:koui...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:58 AM
To: Solr-user
Subject: DIH parallel processing
Hi All,
I
implement partial updates with DIH.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Todd Long [mailto:lon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 8:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: DIH Caching with Delta Import
It appears that DIH entity caching (e.g
r (4.6) with newer solr. I think there might have been an api
change or something that prevented the uncommitted caching code from working
with newer versions, but I honestly forget. This is probably a viable solution
if you don't want to write any code, but it might take some trial and err
Hi everyone!
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to URL encode URLs that I'm
importing from SQL using the DIH? The importer pulls in something like
"http://www.downloadsite.com/document that is being downloaded.doc" and then
the Tika parser can't download the document because it ends up trying
Hello everyone,
I am having difficulty enabling phrase highlighting and am hoping someone
here can offer some help. This is what I have currently:
Solr 4.9
solrconfig.xml (partial snip)
xml
explicit
10
tiguous=true ?
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Teague James
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am having difficulty enabling phrase highlighting and am hoping someone
>> here can offer some help. This is what I have currently:
the phrase
correct. It is the method of highlighting (I'm trying to get one set of tags
per phrase) and the occasional breaking of a single phrase into 2 hits.
Given that setup, what do you recommend? I'm not sure I understand the approach
you're describing. I appreciate the help!
Thanks everyone who replied! The FastVectorHighlighter did the trick. Here
is how I configured it:
In solrconfig.xml:
In the requestHandler I added:
on
text
true
100
In schema.xml:
I modified the text field:
I restarted Solr, re-indexed the documents and tested. All phrases are
correctly highli
roduces it. At
the very least, we should handle these problems better than throwing SIOOB like
this.
Long term, there is probably a better design we could come up with for how
terms are identified within queries and how collations are generated.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Me
Brian,
Be sure to have...
transformer="RegexTransformer"
...in your tag. It’s the RegexTransformer class that looks for
"splitBy".
See https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#RegexTransformer for more
information.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Origin
I am trying to build an edismax search handler that will allow a fuzzy search,
using the "query fields" property (qf).
I have two instances of SOLR 4.8.1, one of which has edismax "qf" configured
with no fuzzy search
...
ns_name^3.0 i_topic^3.0 i_object_type^3.0
...
And the other with a fuzzy
t returned for terms that *are* in your dictionary. You
can set them to the same value, unless you want fewer suggestions when the
terms is in the dictionary.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Solanki [mailto:nitinml...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February
uot;hope" in them
- The spellchecker will try to return you up to 10 suggestions for "hope", but
only up to 5 suggestions for "life"
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Solanki [mailto:nitinml...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 11:3
It will try to give you suggestions up to the number you specify, but if fewer
are available it will not give you any more.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Solanki [mailto:nitinml...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 11:40 PM
To: solr-user
k.collate=false". Also, I wouldn't set
"maxCollationTries" as high as 100, as it could (sometimes) potentially check
100 possibly collations against the index and that would be very slow.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Solanki [mailto:ni
Ashish,
I would not recommend using spellcheck against a phonetic-analyzed field.
Instead, you can use to create a separate field that is lightly
analyzed and use the copy for spelling.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Ashish Mukherjee
Sorry, I've been a bit unfocused from this list for a bit. When I was
working with the APTF code I rewrote a big chunk of it and didn't include
the inclusion of the original tokens as I didn't need it at the time. That
feature could easily be added back in. I will see if I can find a bit of
time fo
he same number as the last word in the matched series?
>
> BTW, i looked at your code re this. It is quite informative to a
> newbie. Thanks!
>
>
> On 3/19/2015 11:38 AM, James Strassburg [via Lucene] wrote:
>
> Sorry, I've been a bit unfocused from this
is is something I've personally wanted for a long
time.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: elisabeth benoit [mailto:elisaelisael...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 7:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: using DirectSpellChecker and FileBasedSp
possible using faceting, or does it seem like a workable
feature I could implement?
Cheers,
James Sewell,
PostgreSQL Team Lead / Solutions Architect
__
Level 2, 50 Queen St, Melbourne VIC 3000
*P *(+61) 3 8370 8000 *W* www.lisasoft.com *F *(+61) 3 8370 809
ot;:"true"}
at
org.apache.solr.common.cloud.HashBasedRouter.hashToSlice(HashBasedRouter.java:65)
at
org.apache.solr.common.cloud.HashBasedRouter.getTargetSlice(HashBasedRouter.java:39)
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.UpdateRequest.getRoutes(UpdateRequest.java:206)
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.directUpdate(CloudSolrClient.java:581)
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.sendRequest(CloudSolrClient.java:948)
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(CloudSolrClient.java:839)
... 6 more
All nodes are active in the solr admin, not sure where to go from here.
Thanks in advance!
James
I'm having a config issue, I'm posting the error from Solrj which also
includes the cluster state JSON:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: No active slice servicing hash code
2ee4d125 in DocCollection(rfp365)={
"shards":{"shard1":{
"range":"-",
"state":"active",
indexed term and will suggest "attorney".
You'll need to have the same synonyms set up against the query field, but you
have the option of making these query-time synonyms if you prefer.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Yacyshyn [mailto:ryan.
(), calling super(), then post-filtering out your stop
words from the response. You'll want to request a few more terms so you're
more likely to get results even if a term or two get filtered out. You can
specify your custom spell checker in solrconfig.xml.
James Dyer
Ingram Con
Dear Solr Community,
We would like to provide an in-house group of users access to our Solr database
in a way that meets the following specifications:
1. Use the Jetty web service that Solr 6.0 installs by default.
2. Provide an M2M (machine-to-machine) interface, so a user can setu
Correction: Item 1 is not an absolute requirement; we can use Apache or Tomcat
if that makes things any easier.
-Original Message-
From: Gregoric, James [mailto:james.grego...@childrens.harvard.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr M2M
Hello,
I am trying to install Solr 6.0.0 and have been successful with the default
installation, following the instructions provided on the Apache Solr
website. However, I do not want Solr running on port 8983, I want it to run
on port 80. I started a new Ubuntu 14.04 VM, installed open JDK 8, the
d
be appreciated. If this is a "feature" of the application, it'd be nice to see
that in the documentation.
Thanks Shawn!
-Teague
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 4:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Su
Hi
I think you'll need to do some unzipping of your zip files using an unzip
application before you post to Solr. If you do this via a OS level batch script
you can apply logic there to deal with nested zips. Then post your unzipped
files to Solr via Curl.
James
-Original Me
isplay/solr/Spell+Checking for more
information.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: kaveh minooie [mailto:ka...@plutoz.com]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 8:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: using spell check on phrases
Hi everyone
I am using solr 6 a
llChecking-Thespellcheck.maxCollationTriesParameter
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: SRINI SOLR [mailto:srini.s...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 12:05 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 4.3.1 - Spell-Checker with MULTI-WORD PHRASE
Hi all - please help me he
at this point. I
tried blowing it all away and restarting from scratch with no luck. Where
should I be looking for problems here? I am running this on a MacBook, OS X
10.9, latest JDK (1.8).
James
--
*James Pritchett*
Leader, Process Redesign and Analysis
don't really have anything to go on for
troubleshooting besides asking dumb questions.
James
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:24 AM, John Bickerstaff wrote:
> Please share the exact query syntax?
>
> Are you using a collection you built or one of the examples?
>
> On Fri, Sep
ot; type rather than one of the text based fieldTypes.
> "string" types are not tokenized, thus a field with
> "My dog has fleas" will fail to find "My". It'll even not match
> "my dog has fleas" (note capital "M").
>
> The admin UI
leas" (note capital "M").
That appears to be the issue. Searching for name:Foundation indeed returns
the expected result. I will now go find some better entry point to SOLR
than the tutorial, which has wasted enough of my time for one day. Any
suggestions would be welcome.
James
On
they can't imagine approaching from a blank slate.
Thanks for the suggestions. Had to chuckle, though: one of your links (
quora.com) is the one that I started with. Step 1: "Download Solr, actually
do the tutorial ..."
Best wishes,
James
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:41 PM, John Bic
restimated in a tutorial.
James
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I apologize if this is a really stupid question. I followed all
>
> It's not a stupid question, the tutorial is completley broken -- and for
> that matter, in my opinion, the data_driv
interface, which was just simpler than copying and pasting that
hairy-looking, multiline command into a terminal. If you used the films
example as the basis for a tutorial and wrote it up in pretty HTML, you
could include screenshots, etc. That would make it completely painless.
James
Can someone please help me troubleshoot my Solr 6.0 highlighting issue? I
have a production Solr 4.9.0 unit configured to highlight responses and it
has worked for a long time now without issues. I have recently been testing
Solr 6.0 and have been unable to get highlighting to work. I used my 4.9
c
) be accomplished following the
approach outlined here:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Mohan, Sowmya [mailto:sowmya.mo...@icf.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:07 AM
To: solr-user
Can someone please help me troubleshoot my Solr 6.0 highlighting issue? I
have a production Solr 4.9.0 unit configured to highlight responses and it
has worked for a long time now without issues. I have recently been testing
Solr 6.0 and have been unable to get highlighting to work. I used my 4.9
c
Hi - Thanks for the reply, I'll give that a try.
-Original Message-
From: jimtronic [mailto:jimtro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 3:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 6.0 Highlighting Not Working
Perhaps you need to wrap your inner "" and "" tags in t
I have a staging and a production solr cluster. I'd like to have them use
the same zookeeper cluster. It seems like it is possible if I can set a
different directory for the second cluster. I've looked through the
documentation though and I can't quite figure out where to set that up. As
a result m
.org/solr/guide/6_6/setting-up-an-external-zookeeper-ensemble.html#SettingUpanExternalZooKeeperEnsemble-PointSolrattheinstance
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:01 PM, James Keeney
> wrote:
>
> > I have a staging and a production solr cluster. I'd like to have them use
> >
I've setup the suggester and want to act on the full document when user
selects one of the suggestions.
Ideally it would be nice to be able to tell the suggester to return more
than just the field that the suggestion index is built from.
If that can't be done, then should I do the following:
esters are not intended to automatically do another search if
> that's what you're asking.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:49 AM, James Keeney
> wrote:
> > I've setup the suggester and want to act on the full document when user
> > select
Hello folks,
To start, we have a sharded solr cloud configuration running solr version 5.1.0
. During shard to shard communication there is a problem state where queries
are sent to a replica, and on that replica the storage is inaccessible. The
node is healthy so it’s still taking requests w
the moment. If you need any additional information, I'd
be glad to provide it.
Thanks for reading!
James
Hello,
Thanks for reading this, but it has been resolved. I honestly don't know
what was happening, but restarting my shell and running the exact same
commands today instead of yesterday seems to have fixed it.
Best,
James
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:07 PM, James Muerle wrote:
> Hello,
For NOT NULL, I had some success using:
WHERE field_name <> '' (greater or less than empty quotes)
Best regards,
Gethin.
From: Joel Bernstein
Sent: 05 January 2017 20:12:19
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Regarding /sql -- WHERE <> IS NULL and IS
rwise every combination will get reported
as returning results.
I hope this and other comments you've gotten helps demystify spellcheck
configuration. I do agree it is fairly complicated and frustrating to get it
just right.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From:
its abilities? Even in this case,
it'd be nice if it failed more gracefully than this.
Could you provide the query parameters you are sending and also how you have
spellcheck configured?
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Clemens Wyss DEV [mailto:cl
MS
Why does highlighting fail for "1a" type searches? Any help is appreciated!
Thanks!
-Teague James
pha-numeric two character value, such a n0, b1, 1z, etc.:
...
Where "8667" is the document ID of the record that had the hit, but no
highlight. Other searches, "ms" for example, return:
...
MS
Why does highlighting fail for "1a" type searches? Any help is appreciated!
Thanks!
-Teague James
mind you but possible.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Teague James wrote:
> Hello everyone! I'm still stuck on this issue and could really use
> some help. I have a Solr 6.0.0 instance that is storing documents
> peppered with text like "1a", "2e",
spellcheck.q is supposed to take a list of raw query terms, so what you're
trying to do in your example won't work. What you should do instead is
space-delimit the actual query terms that exist in "qq" and (nothing else) use
that for your value of spellcheck.q .
James
ed". Also, if you are specifying a
"queryAnalyzerFieldType", it should be the same as your unstemmed text field.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: HL [mailto:freemail.grha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 9:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene
Have you looked at "spellcheck.collate", which re-writes the entire query with
one or more corrected words? See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collate . There are
several options shown at this link that controls how the "collate" feature
works
Its "spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest".
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Jan Verweij - Reeleez [mailto:j...@reeleez.nl]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 2:12 AM
To:
continue I have to
create the node complained about and then execute the “rmr /overseer/queue”
again, until it stumbled upon another node that doesn’t exist, rinse, wash,
repeat…
This is w/ Solr 4.7.1 and ZooKeeper 3.4.6
--
James Hardwick
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Mark Miller
sspelling and combine or
break words in one shot. That is, it cannot detect that "mob lie" should
become "mobile".
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2014 4:21 PM
To: s
My Solr 4.8.0 index includes a field called 'dom_title'. The field is
displayed in the result set. I want to be able to highlight keywords from
this field in the displayed results. I have tried configuring solrconfig.xml
and I have tried adding parameters to the query "&hl=true&hl.fl=dom_title"
but
rare cases when
spellcheck is used in warming queries. I do not remember exactly what caused
this or if it was ever fixed.
Besides that, you might want to post a stack trace or describe what happens
when it doesn't restart. Perhaps someone here will know what the problem is.
James Dyer
I
angle" and "wrangler" might be stemmed to the same word. (by
the way, you shouldn't spellcheck against a stemmed or otherwise
heavily-analyzed field).
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
Sent
edCommentId=13096153&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13096153
for why.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Alistair [mailto:ali...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 3:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr
Vicky,
I resolved this by making sure that the field that is searched has
"stored=true". By default "text" is searched, which is the destination of
the copyFields and is not stored. If you change your copyField destination
to a field that is stored and use that field as the default search field
th
simply doesn't have) will take
longer to complete.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 4:49 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Spell checker - limit on number of misspe
between the "N" values from Endeca and key/value
pairs to translate something like N=4000 to "fq=Language:English". With solr,
there is more you need to do in your app that the backend doesn't manage for
you. In the end, though, it lets you sparate your concerns b
Hello all,
I am working with Solr 4.9.0 and am searching for phrases that contain words
like "of" or "to" that Solr seems to be ignoring at index time. Here's what
I tried:
curl http://localhost/solr/update?commit=true -H "Content-Type: text/xml"
--data-binary '100blah blah blah knowledge of scie
is the stopword.txt. You could either empty that file
out or change the field type for your field.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Teague James wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am working with Solr 4.9.0 and am searching for phrases that contain
> words like "of" or "to"
ing) by default uses
lang/stopwords_en.txt (which wouldn't be empty if you check).
What you're looking at is the stopword.txt. You could either empty that file
out or change the field type for your field.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Teague James
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
&
t.com/ and @solrstart Solr popularizers community:
https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Teague James wrote:
> Hi Anshum,
>
> Thanks for replying and suggesting this, but the field type I am using (a
> modified text_general) in my schema ha
1 - 100 of 881 matches
Mail list logo
