Re: Upgrade Solr3.5 to Solr4.1 - Index Reformat ?

esponse(even with waitFlush=true) - i am doubting if optimization really happened , but details on statistics page shows me correct number of segments. On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Shawn Heisey-4 [via Lucene] < ml-node+s472066n4046834...@n3.nabble.com> wrote: > On 3/12/2013 4:17 PM, f

Re: Upgrade Solr3.5 to Solr4.1 - Index Reformat ?

Hi Shawn, I tried optimizing using this command... curl 'http://localhost:/solr/update?optimize=true&maxSegments=10&waitFlush=true' And i got this response within secs... 0840 Is this a valid response that one should get ? I checked the statistics link from /solr/admin page and it show

Re: Upgrade Solr3.5 to Solr4.1 - Index Reformat ?

Also, Is it absolutely necessary to set the maxSegments=1 , if we need to reformat the whole index ? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-Solr3-5-to-Solr4-1-Index-Reformat-tp4046391p4052991.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Upgrade Solr3.5 to Solr4.1 - Index Reformat ?

Hello, We are planning to upgrade our solr servers from version 3.5 to 4.1. We have master slave configuration and the index size is quite big (i.e. around 14 GB ). 1. Do we really need to re-format the whole index , when we upgrade to 4.1 ? 2. What will be the consequences - if we do not re-forma

Re: Upgrade Solr3.5 to Solr4.1 - Index Reformat ?

Thanks Shawn. So if we have new segments in 4.1 format and all old files in 3.5 format at the same time, then will it cause any performance degradation on slaves while reading index files ( which will contain both 3.5 formatted and 4.1 formatted files)? -- View this message in context: http://

Re: Upgrade Solr3.5 to Solr4.1 - Index Reformat ?

Thanks Tomas! I see the latest available version is 4.1 - but you have suggested a 4.2 version, where can i grab 4.2 version from? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-Solr3-5-to-Solr4-1-Index-Reformat-tp4046391p4046471.html Sent from the Solr - User maili

Re: Upgrade Solr3.5 to Solr4.1 - Index Reformat ?

Thanks Tomas/Shawn! One more question related to backward compatibilty. Previously we had upgraded our solr master/slaves from 1.4 version to 3.5 version - We didn't reformat the whole index then. So i believe there will be some files with 1.4 format present in our index. Now when we upgrade from

Re: Upgrade Solr3.5 to Solr4.1 - Index Reformat ?

Hi Shawn, Do we really need to optimize in order to reformat ? If yes, What is the best way of optimizing index - Online or Offline ? Can we do it online ? If yes - 1. What is the http request which we can use to invoke optimization - How long it takes ? 2. What is the command line command to invo

Solr Index linear growth - Performance degradation.

We have 4 shards with 14GB index on each of them Each shard has a master and 3 slaves(each of them with 32GB RAM) We're expecting that the index size will grow to double or triple in near future. So we thought of merging our indexes to 28GB index so that each shard has 28GB index and also increase

Re: Solr Index linear growth - Performance degradation.

Here's few list of queries --- parallel zur xml beschreibungsdatei gibt es eine die verbindung zwischen beiden sei ten geschieht die owner klasse muss sich aus der benutzer ein oder mehrere lieblingsfarben ausw hlen kann found sample questions at http bjs ojp

Re: Solr Index linear growth - Performance degradation.

1. So we have 24.5GB assigned to jvm which is half of the total memory, which is 48GB RAM.(If that's what you meant, and if i am getting that right ?) 2. Size of *.fdt and *fdx is around 300m and 50m respectively.So that's definitely less that 5%. Do you see a problem there ? Is there a way that w

Re: Solr Index linear growth - Performance degradation.

It looks like reducing the jvm heap allocation did help in lowering the response time to some extent. Thanks for the pointer. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Index-linear-growth-Performance-degradation-tp4000934p4001056.html Sent from the Solr - User mai

Re: Solr Index linear growth - Performance degradation.

index hits == total number of documents found by search query. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Index-linear-growth-Performance-degradation-tp4000934p4001063.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr Index linear growth - Performance degradation.

Its 7.2Gig Hits. (GB was typo) This is the total number of index hits - calculated by summing each "numFound" attribute from solr query response. We have RHEL Tikanga version. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Index-linear-growth-Performance-degradation-tp

Re: Solr Index linear growth - Performance degradation.

Its 7,200,000 hits == number of documents found by all 10K queries. We have RHEL tikanga version. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Index-linear-growth-Performance-degradation-tp4000934p4001069.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.

Re: Solr Index linear growth - Performance degradation.

The queries were extracted from production log. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Index-linear-growth-Performance-degradation-tp4000934p4001182.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr Index linear growth - Performance degradation.

These are simple search queries and Its multithreaded . -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Index-linear-growth-Performance-degradation-tp4000934p4001184.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.